Tyrosine-kinase inhibitor combined with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity-matched study

被引:3
|
作者
Guo, Yongjian [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Jingqiang [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Licong [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Kangshun [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Jingwen [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Liteng [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Ye [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Bihui [1 ,2 ]
He, Mingji [1 ,2 ]
Lian, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Wensou [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Mingyue [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Dept Minimally Invas Intervent Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Med Univ, Radiol Ctr, Affiliated Hosp 2, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Therapeutic chemoembolization; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor; Brachytherapy; Combined modality therapy; SORAFENIB; RADIOTHERAPY; IMPLANTATION; LENVATINIB; SURVIVAL; TUMOR; ATEZOLIZUMAB; BEVACIZUMAB; PERFORMANCE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1186/s40644-023-00604-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the efficacy and safety of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy (TKI-I) versus TKI alone for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).Methods Data of patients with TACE-refractory HCC who received TKI (sorafenib or lenvatinib) or TKI-I from September 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to diminish potential bias. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Tumor responses and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also compared between the two groups.Results A total of 132 patients were included in this study. Under PSM, 48 paired patients were selected for comparison. The median OS was 23.2 (95% CI 20.9-25.1) months in the TKI-I group versus 13.9 (95% CI 11.1-16.7) months in the TKI group (P < 0.001). The median TTP was 12.8 (95% CI 10.1-15.5) months in the TKI-I group versus 5.8 (95% CI 5.0-6.6) months in the TKI group (P < 0.001). Patients in the TKI-I group had higher objective response rate (68.8% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.001) and disease control rate (89.6% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.007) than those in the TKI group. The incidence and severity of TRAEs in the TKI-I group were comparable to those in the TKI group (any grade, 89.7% vs. 92.2%, P = 0.620; =grade 3, 33.8% vs. 32.8%, P = 0.902).Conclusions TKI-I was safe and significantly improved survival over TKI alone in HCC patients with TACE refractoriness.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Circulating tumor cells are an indicator for the administration of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center, retrospective, propensity-matched study
    Wang, Peng-Xiang
    Sun, Yun-Fan
    Zhou, Kai-Qian
    Cheng, Jian-Wen
    Hu, Bo
    Guo, Wei
    Yin, Yue
    Huang, Jun-Feng
    Zhou, Jian
    Fan, Jia
    Cheung, Tan To
    Qu, Xu-Dong
    Yang, Xin-Rong
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [42] Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Combined with Sorafenib versus TACE Alone for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study
    Ren, Baosheng
    Wang, Wansheng
    Shen, Jian
    Li, Wanci
    Ni, Caifang
    Zhu, Xiaoli
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 10 (05): : 1189 - 1196
  • [43] Integrated I-125 Seed Implantation Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Main Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus
    Wang, Wansheng
    Wang, Chen
    Shen, Jian
    Ren, Baosheng
    Yin, Yu
    Yang, Jun
    Tang, Haohuan
    Zhu, Xiaoli
    Ni, Caifang
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (10) : 1570 - 1578
  • [44] Efficacy and safety of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus programmed death-1 inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization
    Lin, Long-Wang
    Ke, Kun
    Yan, Le-Ye
    Chen, Rong
    Huang, Jing-Yao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [45] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy vs. Transarterial Chemoembolization in Inoperable Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage a Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity-Matched Analysis
    Su, Ting-Shi
    Liang, Ping
    Zhou, Ying
    Huang, Yong
    Cheng, Tao
    Qu, Song
    Chen, Long
    Xiang, Bang-De
    Zhao, Chang
    Huang, De-Jia
    Liang, Shi-Xiong
    Li, Le-Qun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [46] Iodine-125 seed implantation combined with arterial chemoembolization therapy for pain palliation in metastatic bone cancer: a retrospective study
    Yang, Zeran
    Chen, Guang
    Cui, Ye
    Su, Tianhao
    Yu, Jianan
    Xiao, Guowen
    Han, Yanjing
    Jin, Long
    CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY, 2019, 20 (02) : 212 - 218
  • [47] Sunitinib combined with transarterial chemoembolization versus transarterial chemoembolization alone for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching study
    Chen, Jing
    Zhou, Chengya
    Long, Yu
    Yin, Xude
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (01) : 183 - 191
  • [48] Sorafenib Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone for Advanced-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study
    Hu, Hao
    Duan, Zhenhua
    Long, Xiaoran
    Hertzanu, Yancu
    Shi, Haibin
    Liu, Sheng
    Yang, Zhengqiang
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05):
  • [49] Safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and camrelizumab in the treatment of patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Li, Jinpeng
    Kong, Mingxin
    Yu, Guangji
    Wang, Song
    Shi, Zhaozhang
    Han, Huihui
    Lin, Yanyan
    Shi, Jutian
    Song, Jinlong
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [50] Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) combined with endovascular implantation of an iodine-125 seed strand for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombosis versus TACE alone: a two-arm, randomised clinical trial
    Yang, MinJie
    Fang, ZhuTing
    Yan, ZhiPing
    Luo, JianJun
    Liu, LingXiao
    Zhang, Wen
    Wu, LinLin
    Ma, JingQin
    Yang, QingHui
    Liu, QingXin
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 140 (02) : 211 - 219