Decision-making under ambiguity after frontal lobe resection for epilepsy

Purpose: Decision-making is crucial to daily life and can impact our society as well as economic condi-tions. Although the frontal lobes have been identified as important for decision-making, this capacity has only been studied to a limited extent in frontal lobe epilepsy and not at all after frontal lobe resection (FLR) for epilepsy. This study aimed to explore decision-making under ambiguity after FLR for epilepsy. Methods: Fourteen patients having undergone FLR for epilepsy completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) which is a widely used tool to measure decision-making under ambiguity. Iowa Gambling Task scores included in the analysis were: total net score, separate scores from five blocks across the test, and a change score (last block of IGT minus first block). A group of healthy controls (n = 30) was used as a com-parison. Associations between IGT and standardized neuropsychological methods for assessment of exec-utive functions, self-rating questionnaires of mental health, fatigue, and behavior linked to frontal lobe dysfunction were also investigated. Results: The patient group performed inferior to controls at the final block of the IGT (p =.001). A group difference in IGT change scores was found (p =.005), reflecting the absence of a positive change in perfor-mance over time for the FLR group compared to the control group. Correlations with tests of executive functions as well as self-rating scales were mainly statistically nonsignificant. Conclusions: This study shows that patients having undergone FLR for epilepsy have difficulties with decision-making under ambiguity. The performance illustrated a failure to learn throughout the task. Executive as well as emotional deficits may impact decision-making processes in this patient group and need to be considered in further studies. Prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.