Outcomes and Factors Associated with Insufficient Effectiveness of Acute Treatments of Migraine in Japan: Results of the ObserVational survey of the Epidemiology, tReatment, and Care Of MigrainE (OVERCOME [Japan]) Study

被引:8
作者
Hirata, Koichi [1 ]
Komori, Mika [2 ]
Ueda, Kaname [2 ]
Zagar, Anthony J. [3 ]
Kim, Yongin [3 ]
Jaffe, Dena H. [4 ]
Matsumori, Yasuhiko [5 ]
Takeshima, Takao [6 ]
机构
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Mibu, Japan
[2] Eli Lilly Japan KK, Japan Drug Dev & Med Affairs, 5-1-28 Isogamidori,Chuo Ku, Kobe 6510086, Japan
[3] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] Oracle Co, Cerner Enviza, Jerusalem, Israel
[5] Sendai Headache & Neurol Clin, Sendai, Japan
[6] Tominaga Hosp, Osaka, Japan
关键词
OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED-STATES; HEADACHE; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE; DISABILITY; VALIDITY; VERSION; BURDEN; MSQ;
D O I
10.1007/s40801-023-00368-0
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BackgroundKnowledge of patient outcomes and treatment effectiveness associated with acute migraine treatments in Japan is lacking.ObjectiveTo describe patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and treatment effectiveness in three acute treatment groups from OVERCOME (Japan): over-the-counter (OTC) only, prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/acetaminophen (Rx-NSAIDs/ACE) only, and triptans.MethodsOVERCOME (Japan) was an observational, cross-sectional, population-based web survey of people with migraine (July-September 2020). PROs, including the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ), Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Migraine (WPAI-M), were compared pairwise between treatment groups. Logistic regression was used to examine treatment effectiveness.ResultsThe analysis included 9075 survey respondents (OTC only: n = 5791; Rx-NSAIDs/ACE only: n = 751; triptans: n = 2533). Triptan users reported the lowest MSQ scores, most severe disability (MIDAS: 20.7% versus 6.3% and 11.6%) and severe interictal burden (MIBS-4: 50.1% versus 21.2% and 19.8%), and greatest work impairment (WPAI-M: 50.4% versus 32.2% and 30.8%) compared with the OTC and Rx-NSAIDs/ACE groups, respectively. Treatment effectiveness was very poor-to-poor for 60.9%, 43.1%, and 47.6% of the triptan, OTC, and Rx-NSAIDs/ACE groups, respectively. Severe interictal burden was significantly associated with insufficient treatment effectiveness (odds ratios, severe versus no burden: 0.47 [95% confidence interval: 0.40-0.54], 0.56 [0.35-0.89], and 0.41 [0.32-0.52], for the OTC, Rx-NSAIDs/ACE, and triptan groups, respectively).ConclusionPeople with high migraine burden used triptans for acute treatment, but many reported poor treatment effectiveness. Education may be required to promote better treatments, including earlier introduction of migraine-specific acute and preventive medications.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 428
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Clinical practice guideline for chronic headache 2013 [J].
Araki, Nobuo ;
Takeshima, Takao ;
Ando, Naoki ;
Iizuka, Takahiro ;
Igarash, Hisaka ;
Ikeda, Yukio ;
Ito, Yasuo ;
Inagaki, Mieko ;
Imamura, Keiko ;
Ohkuma, Hirohisa ;
Ogawa, Karin ;
Kato, Yuji ;
Kikui, Shoji ;
Kitamura, Takayuki ;
Kudo, Masako ;
Kuwabara, Kentaro ;
Gono, Yukari ;
Kowa, Hisanori ;
Saigoh, Kazumasa ;
Sato, Shinya ;
Shibata, Koichi ;
Shibata, Mamoru ;
Shimazu, Tomokazu ;
Shimizu, Toshihiko ;
Suzuki, Michiyasu ;
Takahashi, Yuji ;
Takekawa, Hidehiro ;
Doi, Hikaru ;
Nagata, Eiichiro ;
Nakano, Toshiya ;
Hashizume, Masahiro ;
Hashimoto, Shiori ;
Hamada, Junichi ;
Hirata, Koichi ;
Fujiki, Naoto ;
Fujita, Mitsue ;
Yamane, Kiyomi ;
Wajima, Koichi ;
Watanabe, Yuka .
NEUROLOGY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 7 (05) :231-259
[2]  
Buse DC, 2009, MAYO CLIN PROC, V84, P422, DOI 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60561-2
[3]  
Buse DC, 2007, NEUROLOGY, V68, pA89
[4]   Minimal important differences in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1 [J].
Cole, J. C. ;
Lin, P. ;
Rupnow, M. F. T. .
CEPHALALGIA, 2009, 29 (11) :1180-1187
[5]  
Diener H.-C., 2019, Clinical and Translational. Neuroscience, V3, DOI [10.1177/2514183X18823377, DOI 10.1177/2514183X18823377, 10.1177/2514183x18823377]
[6]   Preventive treatment in migraine and the new US guidelines [J].
Estemalik, E. ;
Tepper, S. .
NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2013, 9 :709-720
[7]  
Headache Clinical Practice Guideline Development Committee, 2021, Clinical Practice Guideline for Headache Disorders 2021
[8]   Comprehensive population-based survey of migraine in Japan: results of the ObserVational Survey of the Epidemiology, tReatment, and Care Of MigrainE (OVERCOME [Japan]) study [J].
Hirata, Koichi ;
Ueda, Kaname ;
Komori, Mika ;
Zagar, Anthony J. ;
Selzler, Katherine J. ;
Nelson, Ann Marie ;
Han, Yimei ;
Jaffe, Dena H. ;
Matsumori, Yasuhiko ;
Takeshima, Takao .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2021, 37 (11) :1945-1955
[9]   Unmet Needs in Japanese Patients Who Report Insufficient Efficacy with Triptans for Acute Treatment of Migraine: Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data [J].
Hirata, Koichi ;
Ueda, Kaname ;
Komori, Mika ;
Ye, Wenyu ;
Kim, Yongin ;
Cotton, Sarah ;
Jackson, James ;
Treuer, Tamas .
PAIN AND THERAPY, 2021, 10 (01) :415-432
[10]   Social burden of people with the migraine diagnosis in Japan: evidence from a population-based cross-sectional survey [J].
Igarashi, Hisaka ;
Ueda, Kaname ;
Jung, Sungeun ;
Cai, Zhihong ;
Chen, Yirong ;
Nakamura, Tomomi .
BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11)