Anonymizing Radiographs Using an Object Detection Deep Learning Algorithm

被引:9
作者
Khosravi, Bardia [1 ,2 ]
Mickley, John P. [1 ]
Rouzrokh, Pouria [1 ,2 ]
Taunton, Michael J. [1 ,3 ]
Larson, A. Noelle [1 ,3 ]
Erickson, Bradley J. [2 ]
Wyles, Cody C. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Orthoped Surg Artificial Intelligence Lab, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Radiol Informat Lab, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Anat Pathol, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Conventional Radiography; Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); Experimental In-vestigations; Skeletal-Axial; Supervised Learning; Thorax; Transfer Learning;
D O I
10.1148/ryai.230085
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Radiographic markers contain protected health information that must be removed before public release. This work presents a deep learning algorithm that localizes radiographic markers and selectively removes them to enable de-identified data sharing. The authors annotated 2000 hip and pelvic radiographs to train an object detection computer vision model. Data were split into training, validation, and test sets at the patient level. Extracted markers were then characterized using an image processing algorithm, and potentially useful markers (eg, "L" and "R") without identifying information were retained. The model achieved an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.96 on the internal test set. The de-identification accuracy was 100% (400 of 400), with a de-identification false-positive rate of 1% (eight of 632) and a retention accuracy of 93% (359 of 386) for laterality markers. The algorithm was further validated on an external dataset of chest radiographs, achieving a deidentification accuracy of 96% (221 of 231). After fine-tuning the model on 20 images from the external dataset to investigate the potential for improvement, a 99.6% (230 of 231, P = .04) de-identification accuracy and decreased false-positive rate of 5% (26 of 512) were achieved. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of a two-pass approach in image de-identification.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Free DICOM de-identification tools in clinical research: functioning and safety of patient privacy [J].
Aryanto, K. Y. E. ;
Oudkerk, M. ;
van Ooijen, P. M. A. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (12) :3685-3695
[2]   Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables [J].
Badgeley, Marcus A. ;
Zech, John R. ;
Oakden-Rayner, Luke ;
Glicksberg, Benjamin S. ;
Liu, Manway ;
Gale, William ;
McConnell, Michael, V ;
Percha, Bethany ;
Snyder, Thomas M. ;
Dudley, Joel T. .
NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2019, 2 (1)
[3]   A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging department [J].
Barry, Kate ;
Kumar, Saravana ;
Linke, Rebecca ;
Dawes, Emma .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2016, 63 (03) :148-154
[4]  
DeGrave Alex J., 2020, medRxiv
[5]  
Edwards Ashley, 2010, J Healthc Inf Manag, V24, P22
[6]  
Institute of Medicine Board on Health Care Services Board on Health Sciences Policy, 2009, Committee on Health Research and the PrivacyofHealth Information: The HIPAAPrivacyRule.Beyond the HIPAA Privacy Rule: Enhancing Privacy, Improving Health Through Research
[7]  
Irvin J, 2019, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, P590
[8]  
Jocher Glenn, 2022, Zenodo
[9]   Enhancing deep learning based classifiers with inpainting anatomical side markers (L/R markers) for multi-center trials [J].
Kim, Ki Duk ;
Cho, Kyungjin ;
Kim, Mingyu ;
Lee, Kyung Hwa ;
Lee, Seungjun ;
Lee, Sang Min ;
Lee, Kyung Hee ;
Kim, Namkug .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2022, 220
[10]   A De-Identification Pipeline for Ultrasound Medical Images in DICOM Format [J].
Monteiro, Eriksson ;
Costa, Carlos ;
Oliveira, Jose Luis .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2017, 41 (05)