On Magnetic Models in Wavefunction Ensembles

被引:0
|
作者
De Carlo, Leonardo [1 ,2 ]
Wick, William D.
机构
[1] Scuola Normale Super Pisa, Piazza Cavalieri 7, I-56126 Pisa, Italy
[2] Luiss Guido Carli, Dept Econ & Finance, Viale Romania 32, I-00197 Rome, Italy
关键词
quantum magnetism; wavefunction ensembles; large deviations; QUANTUM; ENTANGLEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/e25040564
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
In a wavefunction-only philosophy, thermodynamics must be recast in terms of an ensemble of wavefunctions. In this perspective we study how to construct Gibbs ensembles for magnetic quantum spin models. We show that with free boundary conditions and distinguishable "spins" there are no finite-temperature phase transitions because of high dimensionality of the phase space. Then we focus on the simplest case, namely the mean-field (Curie-Weiss) model, in order to discover whether phase transitions are even possible in this model class. This strategy at least diminishes the dimensionality of the problem. We found that, even assuming exchange symmetry in the wavefunctions, no finite-temperature phase transitions appear when the Hamiltonian is given by the usual energy expression of quantum mechanics (in this case the analytical argument is not totally satisfactory and we relied partly on a computer analysis). However, a variant model with additional "wavefunction energy" does have a phase transition to a magnetized state. (With respect to dynamics, which we do not consider here, wavefunction energy induces a non-linearity which nevertheless preserves norm and energy. This non-linearity becomes significant only at the macroscopic level.) The three results together suggest that magnetization in large wavefunction spin chains appears if and only if we consider indistinguishable particles and block macroscopic dispersion (i.e., macroscopic superpositions) by energy conservation. Our principle technique involves transforming the problem to one in probability theory, then applying results from large deviations, particularly the Gartner-Ellis Theorem. Finally, we discuss Gibbs vs. Boltzmann/Einstein entropy in the choice of the quantum thermodynamic ensemble, as well as open problems.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simulating causal wavefunction collapse models
    Dowker, F
    Herbauts, I
    CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2004, 21 (12) : 2963 - 2979
  • [2] Matrix models for beta ensembles
    Dumitriu, I
    Edelman, A
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 43 (11) : 5830 - 5847
  • [3] Matrix models for circular ensembles
    Killip, R
    Nenciu, I
    INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICS RESEARCH NOTICES, 2004, 2004 (50) : 2665 - 2701
  • [4] Transitions in eigenvalue and wavefunction structure in (1+2)-body random matrix ensembles with spin
    Vyas, Manan
    Kota, V. K. B.
    Chavda, N. D.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2010, 81 (03):
  • [5] Nonextensivity in magnetic nanoparticle ensembles
    Binek, Ch.
    Polisetty, S.
    He, Xi
    Mukherjee, T.
    Rajesh, R.
    Redepenning, J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2006, 74 (05):
  • [6] Dynamical wavefunction collapse models in quantum measure theory
    Dowker, Fay
    Ghazi-Tabatabai, Yousef
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL, 2008, 41 (20)
  • [7] A comparison between models of gravity induced decoherence of the wavefunction
    Bera, S.
    Donadi, S.
    Lochan, K.
    Singh, T. P.
    7TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP DICE2014 SPACETIME - MATTER - QUANTUM MECHANICS, 2015, 626
  • [8] Clustering ensembles of neural network models
    Bakker, B
    Heskes, T
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 2003, 16 (02) : 261 - 269
  • [9] Stochastic resonance in models of neuronal ensembles
    Chialvo, DR
    Longtin, A
    MullerGerking, J
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1997, 55 (02): : 1798 - 1808
  • [10] Equivalence of nonequilibrium ensembles in turbulence models
    Biferale, Luca
    Cencini, Massimo
    De Pietro, Massimo
    Gallavotti, Giovanni
    Lucarini, Valerio
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2018, 98 (01)