The journey of participatory budgeting: a systematic literature review and future research directions

被引:50
作者
Bartocci, Luca [1 ]
Grossi, Giuseppe [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Mauro, Sara Giovanna [5 ,6 ]
Ebdon, Carol [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Perugia, Perugia, Italy
[2] Kristianstad Univ, Accounting, Kristianstad, Sweden
[3] Nord Univ, Postbox 1490, NO-8049 Bodo, Norway
[4] Kozminski Univ, Warsaw, Poland
[5] Scuola Super StAnna, Pisa, Italy
[6] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
[7] Univ Nebraska, Sch Publ Adm, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
关键词
idea journey; literature review; longitudinal thematic analysis; participatory budgeting; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC-SECTOR;
D O I
10.1177/00208523221078938
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This systematic literature review analyses the body of knowledge on the budgeting practice known as participatory budgeting (PB). This review identifies and analyses a dataset of 139 English-language papers focused on PB in the public sector published over three decades (1989-2019) in academic journals of different disciplines. The findings shed new light on PB, by systematizing this body of knowledge and explaining the PB idea journey. A research agenda is also set by clarifying overlooked areas of research and practical interests. Points for practitioners The review provides a conceptual model to cope with specific issues in each phase of a PB journey, and it also sheds light on the role of political and managerial actors. Traditional and new themes to design a PB and implement participatory mechanisms are proposed. Practitioners can benefit from indications about the use of technological tools in mobilizing participation.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 774
页数:18
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Reconsidering public budgeting after the COVID-19 outbreak: key lessons and future challenges
    Anessi-Pessina, Eugenio
    Barbera, Carmela
    Langella, Cecilia
    Manes-Rossi, Francesca
    Sancino, Alessandro
    Sicilia, Mariafrancesca
    Steccolini, Ileana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC BUDGETING ACCOUNTING & FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 32 (05) : 957 - 965
  • [2] Broadbent J., 2008, Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal, V21, P129, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570810854383
  • [3] Revisiting the democratic promise of participatory budgeting in light of competing political, good governance and technocratic logics
    Cabannes, Yves
    Lipietz, Barbara
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 2018, 30 (01) : 67 - 84
  • [4] Understanding public-sector reforms: global trends and diverse agendas
    Cheung, ABL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 1997, 63 (04) : 435 - 457
  • [5] Davidson M., 2018, City, V22, P551
  • [6] INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA
    De Vries, Hanna
    Bekkers, Victor
    Tummers, Lars
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 94 (01) : 146 - 166
  • [7] Denyer D., 2006, Management Decision, V44, P213, DOI [DOI 10.1108/00251740610650201, 10.1108/00251740610650201]
  • [8] Ebdon C., 2018, ABFM C 2018 DENV CO, P1
  • [9] Citizen participation in budgeting theory
    Ebdon, Carol
    Franklin, Aimee L.
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 (03) : 437 - 447
  • [10] Ganuza E., 2012, J. Deliberative Democracy, V8, P1