Comparison of Research Spending on New Drug Approvals by the National Institutes of Health vs the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2010-2019

被引:33
作者
Cleary, Ekaterina Galkina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jackson, Matthew J. [1 ,4 ]
Zhou, Edward W. [1 ,4 ]
Ledley, Fred D. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Bentley Univ, Ctr Integrat Sci & Ind, Waltham, MA USA
[2] Exponent Inc, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[3] Bentley Univ, Dept Math Sci, Waltham, MA USA
[4] Bentley Univ, Dept Nat & Appl Sci, Waltham, MA USA
[5] Bentley Univ, Dept Management, Waltham, MA USA
来源
JAMA HEALTH FORUM | 2023年 / 4卷 / 04期
关键词
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION; COMPLEMENT; DISCOVERY; ECONOMICS; PATENTS; RATES; RISK;
D O I
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0511
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Government and the pharmaceutical industry make substantive contributions to pharmaceutical innovation. This study compared the investments by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and industry and estimated the cost basis for assessing the balance of social and private returns. OBJECTIVES To compare NIH and industry investments in recent drug approvals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study of NIH funding associated with drugs approved by the FDA from 2010 to 2019 was conducted from May 2020 to July 2022 and accounted for basic and applied research, failed clinical candidates, and discount rates for government spending compared with analogous estimates of industry investment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Costs from the NIH for research associated with drug approvals. RESULTS Funding from the NIHwas contributed to 354 of 356 drugs (99.4%) approved from 2010 to 2019 totaling $187 billion, with a mean (SD) $1344.6 ($1433.1) million per target for basic research on drug targets and $51.8 ($96.8) million per drug for applied research on products. Including costs for failed clinical candidates, mean (SD) NIH costswere $1441.5 ($1372.0) million per approval or $1730.3 ($1657.6) million per approval, estimated with a 3% discount rate. The mean (SD) NIH spending was $2956.0 ($3106.3) million per approval with a 10.5% cost of capital, which estimates the cost savings to industry from NIH spending. Spending and approval by NIH for 81 first-to-target drugswas greater than reported industry spending on 63 drugs approved from 2010 to 2019 (difference, -$1998.4 million; 95% CI, -$3302.1 million to -$694.6 million; P =.003). Spending from the NIHwas not less than industry spending considering clinical failures, a 3% discount rate for NIH spending, and a 10.5% cost of capital for the industry (difference, -$1435.3 million; 95% CI, -$3114.6 million to $244.0 million; P =.09) or when industry spending included prehuman research (difference, -$1394.8 million; 95% CI, -$3774.8 million to $985.2 million; P =.25). Accounting for spillovers of NIH-funded basic research on drug targets to multiple products, NIH costswere $711.3 million with a 3% discount rate, whichwas less than the range of reported industry costs with 10.5% cost of capital. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of this cross-sectional study found that NIH investment in drugs approved from 2010 to 2019 was not less than investment by the pharmaceutical industry, with comparable accounting for basic and applied research, failed clinical trials, and cost of capital or discount rates. The relative scale of NIH and industry investment may provide a cost basis for calibrating the balance of social and private returns from investments in pharmaceutical innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], New Drugs at FDA: CDERs New Molecular Entities and New Therapeutic Biological Products
[2]   Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules [J].
Azoulay, Pierre ;
Zivin, Joshua S. Graff ;
Li, Danielle ;
Sampat, Bhaven N. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 86 (01) :117-152
[3]   Allocation of National Institutes of Health Funding by Disease Category in 2008 and 2019 [J].
Ballreich, Jeromie M. ;
Gross, Cary P. ;
Powe, Neil R. ;
Anderson, Gerard F. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (01)
[4]   Drug development risk and the cost of capital [J].
Baras, Aris I. ;
Baras, Alex S. ;
Schulman, Kevin A. .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2012, 11 (05) :347-348
[5]   Landscape of Innovation for Cardiovascular Pharmaceuticals: From Basic Science to New Molecular Entities [J].
Beierlein, Jennifer M. ;
McNamee, Laura M. ;
Walsh, Michaell J. ;
Kaitin, Kenneth I. ;
DiMasi, Joseph A. ;
Ledley, Fred D. .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 39 (07) :1409-1425
[6]  
Block F., 2015, State of Innovation: The US Governments Role in Technology Development, P9
[7]   Metrics associated with NIH funding: a high-level view [J].
Boyack, Kevin W. ;
Jordan, Paul .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2011, 18 (04) :423-431
[8]   Public- and Private-Sector Contributions to the Research and Development of the Most Transformational Drugs in the Past 25 Years: From Theory to Therapy [J].
Chakravarthy, Ranjana ;
Cotter, Kristina ;
DiMasi, Joseph ;
Milne, Christopher-Paul ;
Wendel, Nils .
THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2016, 50 (06) :759-768
[9]   The Opportunity Cost of Capital: Development of New Pharmaceuticals [J].
Chit, Ayman ;
Chit, Ahmad ;
Papadimitropoulos, Manny ;
Krahn, Murray ;
Parker, Jayson ;
Grootendorst, Paul .
INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2015, 52
[10]  
Cleary E.G., 2021, Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series, DOI DOI 10.36687/INETWP133