Assessment of Response Bias in Personality Disorder Research

被引:14
作者
Burchett, Danielle [1 ]
Sellbom, Martin [2 ]
Bagby, R. Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol, Dunedin, New Zealand
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat & Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
personality disorders; response bias; inconsistency; underreporting; overreporting; research design; FEIGNED MENTAL-DISORDERS; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; INFORMANT REPORTS; ASSESSMENT INVENTORY; SELF-REPORTS; IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT; CRITERION VALIDITY; DSM-5; PID-5; MMPI-2-RF; SCALES;
D O I
10.1037/per0000608
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Most research on personality disorders (PDs) relies upon self-reported information, commonly collected via standardized self-report inventories or structured interviews. Such data might, for instance, be culled from archival records from applied evaluative contexts or collected as part of dedicated anonymized research studies. Many factors-such as disengagement, distractibility, or motivation to appear in a certain manner-may influence whether self-reported information accurately reflects an examinee's genuine personality characteristics. Despite resultant risks to the validity of collected data, very few measures used in PD research include embedded indicators of response validity. In this article, we review the need for validity measures and strategies that exist to identify invalid self-report data, and we offer several suggestions for PD researchers to consider in order to detect invalid self-reported information and improve the quality of their data.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 104
页数:12
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]   Quality control questions on Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk): A randomized trial of impact on the USAUDIT, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 [J].
Agley, Jon ;
Xiao, Yunyu ;
Nolan, Rachael ;
Golzarri-Arroyo, Lilian .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2022, 54 (02) :885-897
[2]   MTurk Research: Review and Recommendations [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Villamor, Isabel ;
Ramani, Ravi S. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2021, 47 (04) :823-837
[3]   A Psychometric Review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current Status and Future Directions [J].
Al-Dajani, Nadia ;
Gralnick, Tara M. ;
Bagby, R. Michael .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 98 (01) :62-81
[4]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2022, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR)
[5]   Assessing ICD-11 personality trait domain qualifiers with the MMPI-2-RF [J].
Anderson, Jaime L. ;
Sellbom, Martin .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 77 (04) :1090-1105
[6]   Examining the Necessity for and Utility of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI- R) Validity Scales [J].
Anderson, Jaime L. ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Wygant, Dustin B. ;
Edens, John F. .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 37 (05) :312-320
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, International classification of diseases and related health problems, V11th
[8]   The Validity and Clinical Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Response Inconsistency Scale [J].
Bagby, R. Michael ;
Sellbom, Martin .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 100 (04) :398-405
[9]   SOCIAL DESIRABILITY RESPONSE BIAS AND THE MARLOWE-CROWNE SOCIAL DESIRABILITY SCALE [J].
BALLARD, R ;
CRINO, MD ;
RUBENFELD, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1988, 63 (01) :227-237
[10]   Effects of positive impression management on the NEO personality inventory - Revised in a clinical population [J].
Ballenger, JF ;
Caldwell-Andrews, A ;
Baer, RA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2001, 13 (02) :254-260