Fukushima study for Engaging people with type 2 Diabetes in Behaviour Associated Change (FEEDBACK): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

被引:1
作者
Rouyard, Thomas [1 ]
Endo, Mei [2 ]
Nakamura, Ryota [1 ,3 ]
Moriyama, Michiko [4 ]
Stanyon, Maham [2 ]
Kanke, Satoshi [2 ]
Nakamura, Koki [2 ]
Chen, Cynthia [5 ]
Hara, Yasushi [3 ,6 ]
Ii, Masako [3 ]
Kassai, Ryuki [2 ]
机构
[1] Hitotsubashi Univ, Res Ctr Hlth Policy & Econ, 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi, Tokyo 1868601, Japan
[2] Fukushima Med Univ, Dept Community & Family Med, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 9601247, Japan
[3] Hitotsubashi Univ, Grad Sch Econ, 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi, Tokyo 1868601, Japan
[4] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed & Hlth Sci, Div Nursing Sci, 1-2-3 Kasumi,Minami Ku, Hiroshima, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, 12 Sci Dr 2,10-01, Singapore 117549, Singapore
[6] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Business Adm, 2-1 Rokkodaicho, Kobe, Hyogo 6570013, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Type; 2; diabetes; Self-management; Behavioural intervention; Risk communication; Heart age; Doctor-patient relationship; Doctor-patient communication; Behavioural contract; Primary care; Cluster randomised trial; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; SELF-MANAGEMENT; MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS; BODY-MASS; METAANALYSIS; RISK; INTERVENTIONS; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07345-6
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe growing burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the rising cost of healthcare worldwide make it imperative to identify interventions that can promote sustained self-management behaviour in T2DM populations while minimising costs for healthcare systems. The present FEEDBACK study (Fukushima study for Engaging people with type 2 Diabetes in Behaviour Associated Change) aims to evaluate the effects of a novel behaviour change intervention designed to be easily implemented and scaled across a wide range of primary care settings.MethodsA cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a 6-month follow-up will be conducted to evaluate the effects of the FEEDBACK intervention. FEEDBACK is a personalised, multi-component intervention intended to be delivered by general practitioners during a routine diabetes consultation. It consists of five steps aimed at enhancing doctor-patient partnership to motivate self-management behaviour: (1) communication of cardiovascular risks using a 'heart age' tool, (2) goal setting, (3) action planning, (4) behavioural contracting, and (5) feedback on behaviour. We aim to recruit 264 adults with T2DM and suboptimal glycaemic control from 20 primary care practices in Japan (cluster units) that will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. The primary outcome measure will be the change in HbA1c levels at 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures include the change in cardiovascular risk score, the probability to achieve the recommended glycaemic target (HbA1c <7.0% [53mmol/mol]) at 6-month follow-up, and a range of behavioural and psychosocial variables. The planned primary analyses will be carried out at the individual level, according to the intention-to-treat principle. Between-group comparisons for the primary outcome will be analysed using mixed-effects models. This study protocol received ethical approval from the research ethics committee of Kashima Hospital, Fukushima, Japan (reference number: 2022002).DiscussionThis article describes the design of a cluster RCT that will evaluate the effects of FEEDBACK, a personalised, multicomponent intervention aimed at enhancing doctor-patient partnership to engage adults with T2DM more effectively in self-management behaviour.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Effects of lifestyle education program for type 2 diabetes patients in clinics: a cluster randomized controlled trial
    Adachi, Misa
    Yamaoka, Kazue
    Watanabe, Mariko
    Nishikawa, Masako
    Kobayashi, Itsuro
    Hida, Eisuke
    Tango, Toshiro
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [2] Barriers to self-management of diabetes
    Ahola, A. J.
    Groop, P. -H.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2013, 30 (04) : 413 - 420
  • [3] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [4] Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020
    不详
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2020, 43 : S66 - S76
  • [5] Diet or diet plus physical activity versus usual care in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: the Early ACTID randomised controlled trial
    Andrews, R. C.
    Cooper, A. R.
    Montgomery, A. A.
    Norcross, A. J.
    Peters, T. J.
    Sharp, D. J.
    Jackson, N.
    Fitzsimons, K.
    Bright, J.
    Coulman, K.
    England, C. Y.
    Gorton, J.
    McLenaghan, A.
    Paxton, E.
    Polet, A.
    Thompson, C.
    Dayan, C. M.
    [J]. LANCET, 2011, 378 (9786) : 129 - 139
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1998, LANCET, V352, P837, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6]
  • [7] Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes 2019
    Araki, Eiichi
    Goto, Atsushi
    Kondo, Tatsuya
    Noda, Mitsuhiko
    Noto, Hiroshi
    Origasa, Hideki
    Osawa, Haruhiko
    Taguchi, Akihiko
    Tanizawa, Yukio
    Tobe, Kazuyuki
    Yoshioka, Narihito
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2020, 11 (04) : 1020 - 1076
  • [8] Successful behavioural strategies to increase physical activity and improve glucose control in adults with Type2 diabetes
    Avery, L.
    Flynn, D.
    Dombrowski, S. U.
    van Wersch, A.
    Sniehotta, F. F.
    Trenell, M. I.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2015, 32 (08) : 1058 - 1062
  • [9] Baseline testing in cluster randomised controlled trials: should this be done?
    Bolzern, Jaime E.
    Mitchell, Alex
    Torgerson, David J.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [10] Is the "Heart Age" Concept Helpful or Harmful Compared to Absolute Cardiovascular Disease Risk? An Experimental Study
    Bonner, Carissa
    Jansen, Jesse
    Newell, Ben R.
    Irwig, Les
    Teixeira-Pinto, Armando
    Glasziou, Paul
    Doust, Jenny
    McKinn, Shannon
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (08) : 967 - 978