Prostate cancer incidence in men with prostate-specific antigen below 3 ng/mL: The Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer

被引:3
作者
Ola, Idris Olasunmbo [1 ]
Talala, Kirsi [2 ]
Tammela, Teuvo [3 ,4 ]
Taari, Kimmo [5 ,6 ]
Murtola, Teemu [3 ,4 ]
Kujala, Paula [7 ]
Raitanen, Jani [8 ,9 ]
Auvinen, Anssi [8 ]
机构
[1] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Med, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Finnish Canc Registry, Helsinki, Finland
[3] TAYS Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Tampere, Finland
[4] Tampere Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Technol, Tampere, Finland
[5] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, Med Fac, Helsinki, Finland
[7] Fimlab Labs, Dept Pathol, Tampere, Finland
[8] Tampere Univ, Fac Social Sci, Tampere, Finland
[9] UKK Inst Hlth Promot Res, Tampere, Finland
关键词
cancer screening; prostate cancer incidence; prostate-specific antigen; randomized controlled trials; rescreening intervals; TEST SENSITIVITY; MORTALITY; TRIAL; ERSPC; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.34274
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) can reduce PCa mortality, but also involves overdetection of low-risk disease with potential adverse effects. We evaluated PCa incidence among men with PSA below 3 ng/mL and no PCa diagnosis at the first screening round of the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for PCa. Follow-up started at the first screening attendance and ended at PCa diagnosis, emigration, death or the common closing date (December 2016), whichever came first. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios and their confidence intervals (CI). Among men with PSA <3 ng/mL, cumulative PCa incidence was 9.1% after 17.6 years median follow-up. Cumulative incidence was 3.6% among men with baseline PSA 0 to 0.99 ng/mL, 11.5% in those with PSA 1.0 to 1.99 ng/mL and 25.7% among men with PSA 2 to 2.99 ng/mL (hazard ratio 9.0, 95% CI: 7.9-10.2 for the latter). The differences by PSA level were most striking for low-risk disease based on Gleason score and EAU risk group. PSA values <1 ng/mL indicate a very low 20-year risk, while at PSA 2 to 2.99 ng/mL risks are materially higher, with 4- to 5-fold risk for aggressive disease. Using risk-stratification and appropriate rescreening intervals will reduce screening intensity and overdetection. Using cumulative incidence of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) as the criterion, rescreening intervals could range from approximately 3 years for men with initial PSA 2 to 2.99 ng/mL, 6 years for men with PSA 1 to 1.99 ng/mL to 10 years for men with PSA <1 ng/mL.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 678
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Relationship between initial prostate specific antigen level and subsequent prostate cancer detection in a longitudinal screening study [J].
Antenor, JAV ;
Han, M ;
Roehl, KA ;
Nadler, RB ;
Catalona, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (01) :90-93
[2]   Test sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen in the Finnish randomised prostate cancer screening trial [J].
Auvinen, A ;
Määttänen, L ;
Finne, P ;
Stenman, UH ;
Aro, J ;
Juusela, H ;
Rannikko, S ;
Tammela, TLJ ;
Hakama, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 111 (06) :940-943
[3]   A randomized trial of early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (ProScreen): study design and rationale [J].
Auvinen, Anssi ;
Rannikko, Antti ;
Taari, Kimmo ;
Kujala, Paula ;
Mirtti, Tuomas ;
Kenttamies, Anu ;
Rinta-Kiikka, Irina ;
Lehtimaki, Terho ;
Oksala, Niku ;
Pettersson, Kim ;
Tammela, Teuvo L. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 32 (06) :521-527
[4]   Test Sensitivity in the European Prostate Cancer Screening Trial: Results from Finland, Sweden, and the Netherlands [J].
Auvinen, Anssi ;
Raitanen, Jani ;
Moss, Sue ;
de Koning, Harry J. ;
Hugosson, Jonas ;
Tammela, Teuvo ;
Roobol, Monique ;
Lilja, Hans ;
Hakama, Matti .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2009, 18 (07) :2000-2005
[5]   Prostate Cancer Incidence and Disease-Specific Survival of Men with Initial Prostate-Specific Antigen Less Than 3.0 ng/ml Who Are Participating in ERSPC Rotterdam [J].
Bul, Meelan ;
van Leeuwen, Pim J. ;
Zhu, Xiaoye ;
Schroder, Fritz H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (04) :498-505
[6]   Prostate cancer incidence across stage, NCCN risk groups, and age before and after USPSTF Grade D recommendations against prostate-specific antigen screening in 2012 [J].
Butler, Santino S. ;
Muralidhar, Vinayak ;
Zhao, Shuang G. ;
Sanford, Nina N. ;
Franco, Idalid ;
Fullerton, Zoe H. ;
Chavez, Janice ;
D'Amico, Anthony, V ;
Feng, Felix Y. ;
Rebbeck, Timothy R. ;
Nguyen, Paul L. ;
Mahal, Brandon A. .
CANCER, 2020, 126 (04) :717-724
[7]   The efficacy of prostate-specific antigen screening: Impact of key components in the ERSPC and PLCO trials [J].
de Koning, Harry J. ;
Gulati, Roman ;
Moss, Sue M. ;
Hugosson, Jonas ;
Pinsky, Paul F. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Auvinen, Anssi ;
Andriole, Gerald L. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Crawford, E. David ;
Nelen, Vera ;
Kwiatkowski, Maciej ;
Zappa, Marco ;
Lujan, Marcos ;
Villers, Arnauld ;
de Carvalho, Tiago M. ;
Feuer, Eric J. ;
Tsodikov, Alex ;
Mariotto, Angela B. ;
Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M. ;
Etzioni, Ruth .
CANCER, 2018, 124 (06) :1197-1206
[8]   Prostate cancer risk assessment in men with an initial PSA below 3 ng/mL: results from the Goteborg randomized population-based prostate cancer screening trial [J].
Franlund, Maria ;
Godtman, Rebecka Arnsrud ;
Carlsson, Sigrid, V ;
Lilja, Hans ;
Mansson, Marianne ;
Stranne, Johan ;
Hugosson, Jonas .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 52 (04) :256-262
[9]   Urinary biomarkers of prostate cancer [J].
Fujita, Kazutoshi ;
Nonomura, Norio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 (09) :770-779
[10]   Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing for Prostate Cancer Screening-Is the Message Getting Through? [J].
Hamdy, Freddie C. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8 (01) :47-49