Towards Patient-centered Decision-making in Breast Cancer Surgery Machine Learning to Predict Individual Patient-reported Outcomes at 1-year Follow-up

被引:53
作者
Pfob, Andre [1 ]
Mehrara, Babak J. [2 ]
Nelson, Jonas A. [2 ]
Wilkins, Edwin G. [3 ]
Pusic, Andrea L. [1 ]
Sidey-Gibbons, Chris [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Patient Reported Outcomes Value & Experience PROVE, Boston, MA USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Symptom Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
breast cancer surgery; breast reconstruction; individualized treatment; machine learning; shared decision-making; INFORMED DECISION; RECONSTRUCTION; HEALTH; BIAS;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000004862
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:We developed, tested, and validated machine learning algorithms to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up to facilitate individualized, patient-centered decision-making for women with breast cancer. Summary of Background Data:Satisfaction with breasts is a key outcome for women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and reconstruction. Current decision-making relies on group-level evidence which may lead to suboptimal treatment recommendations for individuals. Methods:We trained, tested, and validated 3 machine learning algorithms using data from 1921 women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and reconstruction conducted at eleven study sites in North America from 2011 to 2016. Data from 1921 women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and reconstruction were collected before surgery and at 1-year follow-up. Data from 10 of the 11 sites were randomly split into training and test samples (2:1 ratio) to develop and test 3 algorithms (logistic regression with elastic net penalty, extreme gradient boosting tree, and neural network) which were further validated using the additional site's data.AUC to predict clinically-significant changes in satisfaction with breasts at 1-year follow-up using the validated BREAST-Q were the outcome measures. Results:The 3 algorithms performed equally well when predicting both improved or decreased satisfaction with breasts in both testing and validation datasets: For the testing dataset median accuracy = 0.81 (range 0.73-0.83), median AUC = 0.84 (range 0.78-0.85). For the validation dataset median accuracy = 0.83 (range 0.81-0.84), median AUC = 0.86 (range 0.83-0.89). Conclusion:Individual patient-reported outcomes can be accurately predicted using machine learning algorithms, which may facilitate individualized, patient-centered decision-making for women undergoing breast cancer treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:E144 / E152
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, A comprehensive foundation, DOI [DOI 10.1142/S0129065794000372, 10.1142/S0129065794000372]
[2]   Feasibility and Efficacy of Decision Aids to Improve Decision Making for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Berlin, Nicholas L. ;
Tandon, Vickram J. ;
Hawley, Sarah T. ;
Hamill, Jennifer B. ;
MacEachern, Mark P. ;
Lee, Clara N. ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 39 (01) :5-20
[3]   The BREAST-Q: Further Validation in Independent Clinical Samples [J].
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Klassen, Anne F. ;
Scott, Amie M. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (02) :293-302
[4]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[5]   STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration [J].
Cohen, Jeremie F. ;
Korevaar, Daniel A. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Bruns, David E. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine A. ;
Hooft, Lotty ;
Irwig, Les ;
Levine, Deborah ;
Reitsma, Johannes B. ;
de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (11)
[6]  
Demsar J, 2006, J MACH LEARN RES, V7, P1
[7]   An informed decision? Breast cancer patients and their knowledge about treatment [J].
Fagerlin, Angela ;
Lakhani, Indu ;
Lantz, Paula M. ;
Janz, Nancy K. ;
Morrow, Monica ;
Schwartz, Kendra ;
Deapen, Dennis ;
Salem, Barbara ;
Liu, Lihua ;
Katz, Steven J. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 64 (1-3) :303-312
[8]   Evidence for Health Decision Making - Beyond Randomized, Controlled Trials [J].
Frieden, Thomas R. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (05) :465-475
[9]   Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent [J].
Friedman, Jerome ;
Hastie, Trevor ;
Tibshirani, Rob .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2010, 33 (01) :1-22
[10]   Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine [J].
Friedman, JH .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2001, 29 (05) :1189-1232