Critique of the article, 'Theoretical foundations of phenomenography: a critical review'

被引:14
作者
Akerlind, Gerlese S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Emeritus Fac, Bldg 1c,24 Balmain Crescent, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
Phenomenography; object of study; structure of outcome space; role of researcher; misinterpretations;
D O I
10.1080/07294360.2022.2142535
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This is a critique of the paper, Theoretical Foundations of Phenomenography: A Critical Review (Hajar, 2021. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(7), 1421-1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1833844). This critique highlights misrepresentations of phenomenography within the paper, in particular that the example of phenomenographic research outcomes presented in the paper misrepresents both the object of study and the structure of the outcome space in phenomenographic research. Issues raised by Hajar with respect to the role of the researcher in phenomenographic research, the relative functions of bracketing and interpretive awareness during phenomenographic analysis, and the use of sociocultural perspectives and the notion of individual lifeworlds in phenomenography are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1308
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条