Do Your Homework! A Rights-Based Zetetic Account of Alleged Cases of Doxastic Wronging

被引:2
作者
Atkins, J. Spencer [1 ]
机构
[1] Binghamton Univ, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
关键词
Doxastic wronging; Rights; Epistemic inquiry; Moral encroachment; MORAL ENCROACHMENT; EPISTEMIC PARTIALITY; JUSTIFICATION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10677-023-10426-9
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This paper offers an alternate explanation of cases from the doxastic wronging literature. These cases violate what I call the degree of inquiry right-a novel account of zetetic obligations to inquire when interests are at stake. The degree of inquiry right is a moral right against other epistemic agents to inquire to a certain threshold when a belief undermines one's interests. Thus, the agents are sometimes obligated to leave inquiry open. I argue that we have relevant interests in reputation, relationships, and the well-being of our social groups. These interests generate obligations against others to "do their homework" before closing inquiry. This alternate account makes better sense of puzzles that accounts of doxastic wronging fall prey to.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 292
页数:28
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Alston WilliamP., 1988, EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICAT, P115, DOI [10.2307/2214077, DOI 10.2307/2214077]
[2]   CONCEPTS OF EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATION [J].
ALSTON, WP .
MONIST, 1985, 68 (01) :57-89
[3]  
ANNIS DB, 1978, AM PHILOS QUART, V15, P213
[4]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS TOP
[5]   Moral Encroachment, Wokeness, and the Epistemology of Holding [J].
Atkins, J. Spencer .
EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2023, 20 (01) :86-100
[6]   Defining Wokeness [J].
Atkins, J. Spencer .
SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2023, 37 (03) :321-338
[7]  
Atkins S., 2021, LOGOEPISTEME, V12, P289, DOI [10.5840/logos-episteme202112322, DOI 10.5840/LOGOS-EPISTEME202112322]
[8]  
Atkins S ms, ENCROACHMENT M UNPUB
[9]   KNOWLEDGE, JUSTIFICATION, AND THE NORMATIVITY OF EPISTEMOLOGY [J].
Audi, Robert .
RES PHILOSOPHICA, 2013, 90 (02) :127-145
[10]   Doxastic Harm [J].
Baril, Anne .
MIDWEST STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY, 2022, 46 :281-306