Ensemble Prediction Model for Dust Collection Efficiency of Wet Electrostatic Precipitator

被引:5
作者
Choi, Sugi [1 ]
Kim, Sunghwan [2 ]
Jung, Haiyoung [1 ]
机构
[1] Semyung Univ, Dept Fire & Disaster Prevent, 65 Semyung Ro, Jecheon Si 27136, South Korea
[2] Inha Univ, Dept Elect Engn, 100 Inha Ro, Incheon 22212, South Korea
关键词
ensemble model; artificial neural network; dust collection; wet electrostatic precipitator; PARTICLE COLLECTION; FINE PARTICLES; PERFORMANCE; REMOVAL; EMISSION; CAPTURE; PM2.5;
D O I
10.3390/electronics12122579
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
WESPs (Wet Electrostatic precipitators) are mainly installed in industries and factories where PM (particulate matter) is primarily generated. Such a wet type WESPs exhibits very excellent performance by showing a PM collection efficiency of 97 to 99%, but the PM collection efficiency may decrease rapidly due to a situation in which the dust collector and the discharge electrode is corroded by water. Thus, developing technology to predict efficient PM collection in the design and operation of WESPs is critical. Previous studies have mainly developed machine learning-based models to predict atmospheric PM concentrations using data measured by meteorological agencies. However, the analysis of models for predicting the dust collection efficiency of WESPs installed in factories and industrial facilities is insufficient. In this study, a WESPs was installed, and PM collection experiments were conducted. Nonlinear data such as operating conditions and PM measurements were collected, and ensemble PM collection efficiency prediction models were developed. According to the research results, the random forest model yielded excellent performance, with the best results achieved when the target was PM 7: R2, MAE, and MSE scores of 0.956, 0.747, and 1.748, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Aldrich C., 2010, IFAC P, V43, P79, DOI DOI 10.3182/20100802-3-ZA-2014.00020
  • [2] Spatial prediction of PM10 concentration using machine learning algorithms in Ankara, Turkey
    Bozdag, Asli
    Dokuz, Yesim
    Gokcek, Oznur Begum
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2020, 263 (263)
  • [3] Wet electrostatic scrubbers for the abatement of submicronic particulate
    Carotenuto, Claudia
    Di Natale, Francesco
    Lancia, Amedeo
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2010, 165 (01) : 35 - 45
  • [4] Choi J., 2022, INT J FIRE SCI ENG, V36, P1, DOI [10.7731/KIFSE.75841f94, DOI 10.7731/KIFSE.75841F94]
  • [5] Comparison of Bayesian, k-Nearest Neighbor and Gaussian process regression methods for quantifying uncertainty of suspended sediment concentration prediction
    Fathabadi, Aboalhasan
    Seyedian, Seyed Morteza
    Malekian, Arash
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 818
  • [6] Hybrid modeling scheme for PM concentration prediction of electrostatic precipitators
    Guo, Yishan
    Zheng, Chenghang
    Xu, Zhewei
    Yang, Zhengda
    Weng, Weiguo
    Wang, Yi
    Lu, Jiangang
    Gao, Xiang
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 340 : 163 - 172
  • [7] Hackeling G., 2017, Mastering machine learning with scikit-learn, V2nd
  • [8] Air Quality Prediction in Smart Cities Using Machine Learning Technologies Based on Sensor Data: A Review
    Iskandaryan, Ditsuhi
    Ramos, Francisco
    Trilles, Sergio
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (07):
  • [9] Hybrid electrostatic filtration systems for fly ash particles emission control. A review
    Jaworek, A.
    Sobczyk, A. T.
    Krupa, A.
    Marchewicz, A.
    Czech, T.
    Sliwinski, L.
    [J]. SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 213 : 283 - 302
  • [10] Adversarial Regressive Domain Adaptation Approach for Infrared Thermography-Based Unsupervised Remaining Useful Life Prediction
    Jiang, Yimin
    Xia, Tangbin
    Wang, Dong
    Fang, Xiaolei
    Xi, Lifeng
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 18 (10) : 7219 - 7229