Accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach in dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study

被引:3
|
作者
Pei, Xiyan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Weng, Jinlong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sun, Feng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ma, Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Iao, Siniong [5 ]
Liu, Xiaoqiang [2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Clin Div 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Ctr Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral Biomat & Digital Med Device, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Dept Periodontol, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, 22 Zhongguancun Ave South, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Implant surgery; Dynamic navigation; Accuracy; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.06.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Computer-assisted dynamic navigation surgery could provide accurate implant placement. However, its low efficiency was always criticized by dental surgeons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach with reflective wafers in dynamic navigation for implant placement. Materials and methods: Eighty implants were placed in the standardized polyurethane mandibular models under dynamic navigation and divided into 2 groups according to the calibration methods (n = 40). The U-shaped tube (UT) group used a prefabricated U-shaped tube embedded with radiopaque markers. The reflective wafers (RW) group used a fixation with 3 round reflective wafers as markers. Postoperative cone beam computed tomography images were obtained for implants deviation analyses. The calibration time was used to evaluate the efficiency of the 2 methods. Results: Significant differences were found in the trueness and efficiency between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). The 3D deviations at the implant platform and apex were smaller in UT group (0.89 +/- 0.28 and 0.79 +/- 0.30 mm, respectively) than in the RW group (0.99 +/- 0.28 and 0.98 +/- 0.30 mm, respectively). The angular deviation was larger in the UT group (2.16 +/- 1.12 degrees) than in the RW group (1.53 +/- 0.88 degrees). The calibration approach of RW group was more efficient than the UT group (2.05 +/- 0.55 and 7.50 +/- 0.71 min, respectively). Conclusion: The calibration method of RW improved the efficiency significantly and achieved equivalent trueness with UT for dynamic navigation during implant placement. (c) 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accuracy of Implant Placement Guided with Surgical Template: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study
    Zhou, Miao
    Zhou, Hui
    Li, Shu-Yi
    Yang, Xiao-Bin
    Geng, Yuan-Ming
    Che, Yue-Juan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 41 (02) : E55 - E62
  • [42] Accuracy of intentionally tilted implant placement in the maxilla using dynamic navigation: a retrospective clinical analysis
    Meng, T.
    Zhang, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 51 (04) : 552 - 557
  • [43] Accuracy of a Novel Robot-Assisted System and Dynamic Navigation System for Dental Implant Placement: A Clinical Retrospective Study
    Chen, Jianping
    Ding, Yude
    Cao, Ruijue
    Zheng, Yuchen
    Shen, Liheng
    Wang, Linhong
    Yang, Fan
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [44] Implant Placement Is More Accurate Using Dynamic Navigation
    Block, Michael S.
    Emery, Robert W.
    Cullum, Daniel R.
    Sheikh, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 75 (07) : 1377 - 1386
  • [45] Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study
    Shusterman, Ariel
    Nashef, Rizan
    Tecco, Simona
    Mangano, Carlo
    Lerner, Henriette
    Mangano, Francesco Guido
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 146
  • [46] The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study
    Wang, Xiao-yu
    Liu, Lin
    Guan, Miao-sheng
    Liu, Qian
    Zhao, Tong
    Li, Hong-bo
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 124
  • [47] The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study
    Wang, Xiao-Yu
    Liu, Lin
    Guan, Miao-Sheng
    Liu, Qian
    Zhao, Tong
    Li, Hong-Bo
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 124
  • [48] Comparison of the accuracy of dental implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted systems: an in vitro study
    Zhou, Miao
    Zhou, Hui
    Li, Shu-Yi
    Zhu, Yi-Bo
    Geng, Yuan-Ming
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 122 (04) : 343 - 348
  • [49] Accuracy of dental implant placement with or without the use of a dynamic navigation assisted system: A randomized clinical trial
    Jorba-Garcia, Adria
    Bara-Casaus, Jose Javier
    Camps-Font, Octavi
    Sanchez-Garces, Maria angeles
    Figueiredo, Rui
    Valmaseda-Castellon, Eduard
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (05) : 438 - 449
  • [50] Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a CAD/CAM Surgical Guide: An In Vitro Study
    Nokar, Saeid
    Moslehifard, Elnaz
    Bahman, Tootiaii
    Bayanzadeh, Masoud
    Nasirpouri, Farzad
    Nokar, Arash
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2011, 26 (03) : 520 - 526