Accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach in dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study

被引:3
|
作者
Pei, Xiyan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Weng, Jinlong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sun, Feng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ma, Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Iao, Siniong [5 ]
Liu, Xiaoqiang [2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Clin Div 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Ctr Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral Biomat & Digital Med Device, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Dept Periodontol, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, 22 Zhongguancun Ave South, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Implant surgery; Dynamic navigation; Accuracy; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.06.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Computer-assisted dynamic navigation surgery could provide accurate implant placement. However, its low efficiency was always criticized by dental surgeons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach with reflective wafers in dynamic navigation for implant placement. Materials and methods: Eighty implants were placed in the standardized polyurethane mandibular models under dynamic navigation and divided into 2 groups according to the calibration methods (n = 40). The U-shaped tube (UT) group used a prefabricated U-shaped tube embedded with radiopaque markers. The reflective wafers (RW) group used a fixation with 3 round reflective wafers as markers. Postoperative cone beam computed tomography images were obtained for implants deviation analyses. The calibration time was used to evaluate the efficiency of the 2 methods. Results: Significant differences were found in the trueness and efficiency between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). The 3D deviations at the implant platform and apex were smaller in UT group (0.89 +/- 0.28 and 0.79 +/- 0.30 mm, respectively) than in the RW group (0.99 +/- 0.28 and 0.98 +/- 0.30 mm, respectively). The angular deviation was larger in the UT group (2.16 +/- 1.12 degrees) than in the RW group (1.53 +/- 0.88 degrees). The calibration approach of RW group was more efficient than the UT group (2.05 +/- 0.55 and 7.50 +/- 0.71 min, respectively). Conclusion: The calibration method of RW improved the efficiency significantly and achieved equivalent trueness with UT for dynamic navigation during implant placement. (c) 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accuracy of freehand versus dynamic computer-assisted zygomatic implant placement: An in-vitro study
    Traboulsi-Garet, Bassel
    Jorba-Garcia, Adria
    Bara-Casaus, Javier
    Camps-Font, Octavi
    Valmaseda-Castellon, Eduard
    Figueiredo, Rui
    Sanchez-Garces, M. Angeles
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2025, 155
  • [42] Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice
    Stefanelli, Luigi, V
    DeGroot, Bradley S.
    Lipton, David, I
    Mandelaris, George A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (01) : 205 - 213
  • [43] Learning Curve and Comparison of Dynamic Implant Placement Accuracy Using a Navigation System in Young Professionals
    Spille, Johannes
    Helmstetter, Eva
    Kuebel, Paul
    Weitkamp, Jan-Tobias
    Wagner, Juliane
    Wieker, Henning
    Naujokat, Hendrik
    Floerke, Christian
    Wiltfang, Joerg
    Guelses, Aydin
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [44] Accuracy of intentionally tilted implant placement in the maxilla using dynamic navigation: a retrospective clinical analysis
    Meng, T.
    Zhang, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 51 (04) : 552 - 557
  • [45] Evaluation of a dynamic navigation system for training students in dental implant placement
    Zhan, Yalin
    Wang, Miaozhen
    Cheng, Xueyuan
    Li, Yi
    Shi, Xiaorui
    Liu, Feng
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2021, 85 (02) : 120 - 127
  • [46] Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation and Free Hand Methods During Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Penmetsa, Gautami S.
    Shah, Rahul Manhar
    Raju, M. A. K. V.
    Gadde, Praveen
    Venkata, Ramaraju Alluri
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2024, 50 (05) : 468 - 473
  • [47] Dynamic Navigation System for Immediate Implant Placement in the Maxillary Aesthetic Region
    Battista, Eric
    Gasparro, Roberta
    Cacciola, Maria
    Sammartino, Gilberto
    Marenzi, Gaetano
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [48] Comparison of the accuracy of immediate implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant system in the esthetic zone of the maxilla: a prospective study
    Feng, Yuzhang
    Su, Zhenya
    Mo, Anchun
    Yang, Xingmei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [49] Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study
    Shusterman, Ariel
    Nashef, Rizan
    Tecco, Simona
    Mangano, Carlo
    Lerner, Henriette
    Mangano, Francesco Guido
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 146
  • [50] Dynamic navigation for dental implant placement in single-tooth gaps: A preclinical pilot investigation
    Bose, Mats Wernfried Heinrich
    Beuer, Florian
    Schwitalla, Andreas
    Bruhnke, Maria
    Herklotz, Insa
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 125