Accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach in dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study

被引:3
|
作者
Pei, Xiyan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Weng, Jinlong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sun, Feng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ma, Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Iao, Siniong [5 ]
Liu, Xiaoqiang [2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Clin Div 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Ctr Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral Biomat & Digital Med Device, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Dept Periodontol, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, 22 Zhongguancun Ave South, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Implant surgery; Dynamic navigation; Accuracy; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.06.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Computer-assisted dynamic navigation surgery could provide accurate implant placement. However, its low efficiency was always criticized by dental surgeons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach with reflective wafers in dynamic navigation for implant placement. Materials and methods: Eighty implants were placed in the standardized polyurethane mandibular models under dynamic navigation and divided into 2 groups according to the calibration methods (n = 40). The U-shaped tube (UT) group used a prefabricated U-shaped tube embedded with radiopaque markers. The reflective wafers (RW) group used a fixation with 3 round reflective wafers as markers. Postoperative cone beam computed tomography images were obtained for implants deviation analyses. The calibration time was used to evaluate the efficiency of the 2 methods. Results: Significant differences were found in the trueness and efficiency between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). The 3D deviations at the implant platform and apex were smaller in UT group (0.89 +/- 0.28 and 0.79 +/- 0.30 mm, respectively) than in the RW group (0.99 +/- 0.28 and 0.98 +/- 0.30 mm, respectively). The angular deviation was larger in the UT group (2.16 +/- 1.12 degrees) than in the RW group (1.53 +/- 0.88 degrees). The calibration approach of RW group was more efficient than the UT group (2.05 +/- 0.55 and 7.50 +/- 0.71 min, respectively). Conclusion: The calibration method of RW improved the efficiency significantly and achieved equivalent trueness with UT for dynamic navigation during implant placement. (c) 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison the accuracy of a novel implant robot surgery and dynamic navigation system in dental implant surgery: an in vitro pilot study
    Jianping Chen
    Xiaolei Bai
    Yude Ding
    Liheng Shen
    Xin Sun
    Ruijue Cao
    Fan Yang
    Linhong Wang
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [32] Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study
    Otaghsara, Seyedeh Sahar Taheri
    Joda, Tim
    Thieringer, Florian Markus
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 132
  • [33] Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study
    Ma, Feifei
    Sun, Feng
    Wei, Tai
    Ma, Yu
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (03) : 352 - 360
  • [34] A retrospective study of dynamic navigation system-assisted implant placement
    Lijuan Ma
    Mingjun Ye
    Mingle Wu
    Xiaolei Chen
    Shan Shen
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [35] A retrospective study of dynamic navigation system-assisted implant placement
    Ma, Lijuan
    Ye, Mingjun
    Wu, Mingle
    Chen, Xiaolei
    Shen, Shan
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [36] Accuracy of a Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation System in the Placement of Zygomatic Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study
    Gonzalez Rueda, Juan Ramon
    Garcia Avila, Irene
    de Paz Hermoso, Victor Manuel
    Riad Deglow, Elena
    Zubizarreta-Macho, Alvaro
    Pato Mourelo, Jesus
    Montero Martin, Javier
    Hernandez Montero, Sofia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [37] Dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: A randomized clinical study comparing the flapless versus the conventional approach
    Bhalerao, Ashwini
    Marimuthu, Madhulaxmi
    Wahab, Abdul
    Ayoub, Ashraf
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 130
  • [38] Accuracy of freehand versus dynamic computer-assisted zygomatic implant placement: An in-vitro study
    Traboulsi-Garet, Bassel
    Jorba-Garcia, Adria
    Bara-Casaus, Javier
    Camps-Font, Octavi
    Valmaseda-Castellon, Eduard
    Figueiredo, Rui
    Sanchez-Garces, M. Angeles
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2025, 155
  • [39] Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study
    Lee, Heeje
    Ercoli, Carlo
    Funkenbusch, Paul D.
    Feng, Changyong
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2008, 99 (02): : 107 - 113
  • [40] Learning Curve and Comparison of Dynamic Implant Placement Accuracy Using a Navigation System in Young Professionals
    Spille, Johannes
    Helmstetter, Eva
    Kuebel, Paul
    Weitkamp, Jan-Tobias
    Wagner, Juliane
    Wieker, Henning
    Naujokat, Hendrik
    Floerke, Christian
    Wiltfang, Joerg
    Guelses, Aydin
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2022, 10 (10)