Accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach in dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study

被引:3
|
作者
Pei, Xiyan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Weng, Jinlong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sun, Feng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ma, Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Iao, Siniong [5 ]
Liu, Xiaoqiang [2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Clin Div 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Ctr Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral Biomat & Digital Med Device, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Dept Periodontol, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, 22 Zhongguancun Ave South, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Implant surgery; Dynamic navigation; Accuracy; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.06.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Computer-assisted dynamic navigation surgery could provide accurate implant placement. However, its low efficiency was always criticized by dental surgeons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach with reflective wafers in dynamic navigation for implant placement. Materials and methods: Eighty implants were placed in the standardized polyurethane mandibular models under dynamic navigation and divided into 2 groups according to the calibration methods (n = 40). The U-shaped tube (UT) group used a prefabricated U-shaped tube embedded with radiopaque markers. The reflective wafers (RW) group used a fixation with 3 round reflective wafers as markers. Postoperative cone beam computed tomography images were obtained for implants deviation analyses. The calibration time was used to evaluate the efficiency of the 2 methods. Results: Significant differences were found in the trueness and efficiency between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). The 3D deviations at the implant platform and apex were smaller in UT group (0.89 +/- 0.28 and 0.79 +/- 0.30 mm, respectively) than in the RW group (0.99 +/- 0.28 and 0.98 +/- 0.30 mm, respectively). The angular deviation was larger in the UT group (2.16 +/- 1.12 degrees) than in the RW group (1.53 +/- 0.88 degrees). The calibration approach of RW group was more efficient than the UT group (2.05 +/- 0.55 and 7.50 +/- 0.71 min, respectively). Conclusion: The calibration method of RW improved the efficiency significantly and achieved equivalent trueness with UT for dynamic navigation during implant placement. (c) 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement
    Pinter, Gabor Tamas
    Decker, Roland
    Szenasi, Gabor
    Barabas, Peter
    Huszar, Tamas
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2022, (187):
  • [22] Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement
    Wu, Dong
    Zhou, Lin
    Yang, Jin
    Zhang, Bao
    Lin, Yanjun
    Chen, Jiang
    Huang, Wenxiu
    Chen, Yonghui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [23] Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement
    Dong Wu
    Lin Zhou
    Jin Yang
    Bao Zhang
    Yanjun Lin
    Jiang Chen
    Wenxiu Huang
    Yonghui Chen
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 6
  • [24] Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement-Model-Based Evaluation
    Emery, Robert W.
    Merritt, Scott A.
    Lank, Kathryn
    Gibbs, Jason D.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2016, 42 (05) : 399 - 405
  • [25] Impact of Surgeons' Experience on Implant Placement Accuracy Using a Dynamic Navigation System: A Cadaver Pilot Study
    Pera, Francesco
    Vocaturo, Camillo
    Crupi, Armando
    Longhi, Beatrice
    Campagna, Alessandro
    Fiorino, Antonino
    Gibello, Umberto
    Roccuzzo, Andrea
    PROSTHESIS, 2025, 7 (01):
  • [26] Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation in Implant Placement with a Fully Digital Approach: A Prospective Clinical Trial
    Edelmann, Cornelia
    Wetzel, Martin
    Knipper, Anne
    Luthardt, Ralph G.
    Schnutenhaus, Sigmar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (09)
  • [27] Accuracy of implant placement via dynamic navigation and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery methods: A retrospective study
    Zhang, Sihui
    Cai, Qin
    Chen, Weiyi
    Lin, Yuxuan
    Gao, Yan
    Wu, Dong
    Chen, Jiang
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (02) : 220 - 229
  • [28] The safety of maxillary sinus floor elevation and the accuracy of implant placement using dynamic navigation
    Yang, Miaomiao
    Ma, Yongqing
    Han, Wenli
    Qu, Zhe
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [29] Accuracy of immediate dental implant placement with task-autonomous robotic system and navigation system: An in vitro study
    Chen, Jinyan
    Zhuang, Minjie
    Tao, Baoxin
    Wu, Yiqun
    Ye, Lijuan
    Wang, Feng
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (08) : 973 - 983
  • [30] Comparison the accuracy of a novel implant robot surgery and dynamic navigation system in dental implant surgery: an in vitro pilot study
    Chen, Jianping
    Bai, Xiaolei
    Ding, Yude
    Shen, Liheng
    Sun, Xin
    Cao, Ruijue
    Yang, Fan
    Wang, Linhong
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)