Accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach in dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study

被引:3
|
作者
Pei, Xiyan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Weng, Jinlong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sun, Feng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ma, Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Iao, Siniong [5 ]
Liu, Xiaoqiang [2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Clin Div 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Ctr Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral Biomat & Digital Med Device, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Dept Periodontol, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, 22 Zhongguancun Ave South, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Implant surgery; Dynamic navigation; Accuracy; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.06.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Computer-assisted dynamic navigation surgery could provide accurate implant placement. However, its low efficiency was always criticized by dental surgeons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach with reflective wafers in dynamic navigation for implant placement. Materials and methods: Eighty implants were placed in the standardized polyurethane mandibular models under dynamic navigation and divided into 2 groups according to the calibration methods (n = 40). The U-shaped tube (UT) group used a prefabricated U-shaped tube embedded with radiopaque markers. The reflective wafers (RW) group used a fixation with 3 round reflective wafers as markers. Postoperative cone beam computed tomography images were obtained for implants deviation analyses. The calibration time was used to evaluate the efficiency of the 2 methods. Results: Significant differences were found in the trueness and efficiency between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). The 3D deviations at the implant platform and apex were smaller in UT group (0.89 +/- 0.28 and 0.79 +/- 0.30 mm, respectively) than in the RW group (0.99 +/- 0.28 and 0.98 +/- 0.30 mm, respectively). The angular deviation was larger in the UT group (2.16 +/- 1.12 degrees) than in the RW group (1.53 +/- 0.88 degrees). The calibration approach of RW group was more efficient than the UT group (2.05 +/- 0.55 and 7.50 +/- 0.71 min, respectively). Conclusion: The calibration method of RW improved the efficiency significantly and achieved equivalent trueness with UT for dynamic navigation during implant placement. (c) 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of 3 calibration methods of computer-assisted dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study
    Pei, Xiyan
    Liu, Xiaoqiang
    Iao, Siniong
    Ma, Feifei
    Li, Hong
    Sun, Feng
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 131 (04): : 668 - 674
  • [2] Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation
    Block, Michael S.
    Emery, Robert W.
    Lank, Kathryn
    Ryan, James
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [3] Accuracy of dental implant placement using different dynamic navigation and robotic systems: an in vitro study
    Xu, Zonghe
    Zhou, Lin
    Han, Bin
    Wu, Shuang
    Xiao, Yanjun
    Zhang, Sihui
    Chen, Jiang
    Guo, Jianbin
    Wu, Dong
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [4] Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study
    Feng, Yuzhang
    Yao, Yufei
    Yang, Xingmei
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 130 (05): : 731 - 737
  • [5] Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Using Task-Autonomous Robotic System or Dynamic Navigation: An In Vitro Study
    Chen, Jinyan
    Tao, Baoxin
    Yu, Xinbo
    Wu, Yiqun
    Wang, Feng
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025, 36 (02) : 178 - 190
  • [6] In Vitro Comparison of Time and Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Trephine and Conventional Drilling Techniques Under Dynamic Navigation
    Deeb, Janina Golob
    Frantar, Anja
    Deeb, George R.
    Carrico, Caroline K.
    Rener-Sitar, Ksenija
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 47 (03) : 199 - 204
  • [7] Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement
    Wu, Dong
    Zhou, Lin
    Yang, Jin
    Zhang, Bao
    Lin, Yanjun
    Chen, Jiang
    Huang, Wenxiu
    Chen, Yonghui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [8] Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study
    Guo, Houzuo
    Jiang, Xi
    Lin, Ye
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 150
  • [9] Effect of Clinical Experience on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Dynamic Navigation and Static Guidance: An In Vitro Study
    Fang, Qiao
    Lozada, Jaime
    Kan, Joseph
    Al-Ardah, Aladdin
    Li, Yiming
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2024, 50 (06) : 626 - 635
  • [10] Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement
    Wu, Yiqun
    Tao, Baoxin
    Lan, Kengliang
    Shen, Yihan
    Huang, Wei
    Wang, Feng
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (04) : 362 - 376