Comparative Evaluation of Custom-Made Components and Standard Implants for Acetabular Reconstruction in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:1
作者
Murylev, Valery Yu. [1 ,2 ]
Kukovenko, Grigory A. [1 ,2 ]
Elizarov, Pavel M. [1 ,2 ]
Rukin, Yaroslav A. [2 ]
Muzychenkov, Aleksey V. [1 ,2 ]
Rudnev, Alexander I. [1 ,2 ]
Zhuchkov, Aleksandr G. [1 ]
Alekseev, Semen S. [1 ]
Bobrov, Dmitry S. [1 ,2 ]
Germanov, Valery G. [2 ]
机构
[1] SP Botkin Moscow City Clin Hosp, 8 2,Trubetskaya Str, Moscow 119991, Russia
[2] IM Sechenov First Moscow State Med Univ, Sechenov Univ, 8 2,Trubetskaya Str, Moscow 119991, Russia
来源
TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII | 2023年 / 29卷 / 03期
关键词
revision total hip arthroplasty; acetabular defects; disruption of pelvic ring integrity; custom-made acetabular components; 3D printing; DEFECTS; CLASSIFICATIONS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; THA;
D O I
10.17816/2311-2905-2553
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The use of custom-made acetabular components is one of the promising methods for reconstruction of the acetabulum in cases of significant defects, including those associated with pelvic bone dissociation. It allows achieving stable fixation and restoring the biomechanics of the hip joint. Aim of the study - to compare the results of using individually designed components, supportive antiprotrusion rings, augments, and hemispherical components in revision total hip arthroplasty for type IIIB bone defects according to Paprosky classification. Methods. The study analyzed the treatment outcomes of 90 patients with type IIIB bone defects who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty between 2017 and 2022. Patients were divided into three groups: the first group received individually designed acetabular components, the second group received augments with hemispheres, and the third group had antiprotrusion cages implanted. The analysis included the reasons for revision surgery, operation duration, blood loss volume, and type of revision procedure. Pain and functional outcomes were assessed with WOMAC, Harris Hip Score, and VAS scales. Results. 3D-printed constructs were more frequently implanted in patients with pelvic bone dissociation. The first group showed a significantly positive dynamic in functional outcomes. Complications were diagnosed in 27 ( 30%) cases: joint instability (dislocation) in 10 (11.1%) patients, periprosthetic infection in 8 (8.8%), aseptic loosening in 4 (4.4%), and sciatic nerve neuropathy in 5 (5.5%) patients. The number of these complications was higher in the second and third groups of patients. Conclusion. Custom-made implants using 3D technologies are a preferable option for revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with type IIIB defects according to Paprosky classification, especially in cases of pelvic bone dissociation.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 30
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Management of Paprosky type three B acetabular defects by custom-made components: early results
    Aprato, Alessandro
    Giachino, Matteo
    Bedino, Paolo
    Mellano, Danilo
    Piana, Raimondo
    Masse, Alessandro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 43 (01) : 117 - 122
  • [2] Are Custom Triflange Acetabular Components Effective for Reconstruction of Catastrophic Bone Loss?
    Berasi, Carl C.
    Berend, Keith R.
    Adams, Joanne B.
    Ruh, Erin L.
    Lombardi, Adolph V., Jr.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 473 (02) : 528 - 535
  • [3] Berend ME, 2018, BONE JOINT J, V100B, P50, DOI [10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0362.R1, 10.1302/0301-620X.10061.BJJ-2017-0362.R1]
  • [4] Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    Kamath, Atul F.
    Ong, Kevin
    Lau, Edmund
    Kurtz, Steve
    Chan, Vanessa
    Vail, Thomas P.
    Rubash, Harry
    Berry, Daniel J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 473 (06) : 2131 - 2138
  • [5] Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup
    Buttaro, Martin A.
    Comba, Fernando
    Pusso, Rodolfo
    Piccaluga, Francisco
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 466 (10) : 2482 - 2490
  • [6] Preliminary results of a 3D-printed acetabular component in the management of extensive defects
    Citak, Mustafa
    Kochsiek, Lilly
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    Haasper, Carl
    Suero, Eduardo M.
    Mau, Hans
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 28 (03) : 266 - 271
  • [7] Comparative analysis of current 3D printed acetabular titanium implants
    Dall'Ava, Lorenzo
    Hothi, Harry
    Henckel, Johann
    Di Laura, Anna
    Shearing, Paul
    Hart, Alister
    [J]. 3D PRINTING IN MEDICINE, 2019, 5 (01)
  • [8] Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity
    DeBoer, David K.
    Christie, Michael J.
    Brinson, Martha F.
    Morrison, J. Craig
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (04) : 835 - 840
  • [9] DELEE JG, 1976, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P20
  • [10] Can custom 3D printed implants successfully reconstruct massive acetabular defects? A 3D-CT assessment
    Durand-Hill, Matthieu
    Henckel, Johann
    Di Laura, Anna
    Hart, Alister J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2020, 38 (12) : 2640 - 2648