Social anxiety and emotion regulation flexibility: a daily diary approach

被引:1
作者
Tng, Germaine Y. Q. [1 ]
Yang, Hwajin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Management Univ Singapore, Sch Social Sci, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Singapore Management Univ, Sch Social Sci, 10 Canning Rise, Singapore 179873, Singapore
关键词
Emotion regulation flexibility; social anxiety; emotional intensity; experiential avoidance; daily diary; REGULATION STRATEGIES; DISTRESS TOLERANCE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; POSITIVE AFFECT; DEPRESSION; NEUROTICISM; EXPERIENCE; AVOIDANCE; RUMINATION; LIFE;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2023.2279176
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research suggests that social anxiety symptoms are maintained and intensified by inflexible emotion regulation (ER). Therefore, we examined whether trait-level social anxiety moderates ER flexibility operationalised at both between-person (covariation between variability in emotional intensity and variability in strategy use across occasions) and within-person (associations between emotional intensity and strategy use on a given day) levels. In a sample of healthy college-aged adults (N = 185, Mage = 21.89), we examined overall and emotion-specific intensities (shame, guilt, anxiety, anger, sadness) and regulatory strategies (i.e. experiential avoidance, expressive suppression, and rumination) in response to each day's most emotionally intense event over 6 days. During the study period, we found a positive association between variability in emotional intensity and variability of experiential avoidance in individuals with lower, rather than higher, levels of trait social anxiety after controlling for key covariates (i.e. gender, personality traits, and stress exposure). However, we did not find evidence for the moderating role of trait social anxiety in ER flexibility assessed at within-person levels. Our findings highlight the need to delineate dynamic ER flexibility across everyday events.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 216
页数:18
相关论文
共 91 条
[31]  
Goodman FR., 2021, Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, V6, P100210, DOI [10.1016/J.JADR.2021.100210, DOI 10.1016/J.JADR.2021.100210]
[32]   Emotion Regulation Flexibility: Gender Differences in Context Sensitivity and Repertoire [J].
Goubet, K. Elise ;
Chrysikou, Evangelia G. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
[33]  
Gross J, 2013, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, P16
[34]   Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being [J].
Gross, JJ ;
John, OP .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (02) :348-362
[35]  
Hair J.F., 1998, Multivariate data analysis, VFifth
[36]   Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model [J].
Hayes, SC ;
Strosahl, K ;
Wilson, KG ;
Bissett, RT ;
Pistorello, J ;
Toarmino, D ;
Polusny, MA ;
Dykstra, TA ;
Batten, SV ;
Bergan, J ;
Stewart, SH ;
Zvolensky, MJ ;
Eifert, GH ;
Bond, FW ;
Forsyth, JP ;
Karekla, M ;
McCurry, SM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2004, 54 (04) :553-578
[37]  
Heimberg RG, 2014, SOCIAL ANXIETY: CLINICAL, DEVELOPMENTAL, AND SOCIAL PERSPECTIVES, 3RD EDITION, P705, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-394427-6.00024-8
[38]   Back to Basics: A Naturalistic Assessment of the Experience and Regulation of Emotion [J].
Heiy, Jane E. ;
Cheavens, Jennifer S. .
EMOTION, 2014, 14 (05) :878-891
[39]   EMOTION DYSREGULATION MODEL OF MOOD AND ANXIETY DISORDERS [J].
Hofmann, Stefan G. ;
Sawyer, Alice T. ;
Fang, Angela ;
Asnaani, Anu .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2012, 29 (05) :409-416
[40]  
John O.P., 1999, HDB PERSONALITY THEO, V2nd, P102, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1469-8986.1995.TB03308.X