Validation of the Factor Structure of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire on the Croatian Students Sample

被引:2
作者
Taksic, Iva [1 ]
Maglica, Barbara Kalebic [2 ]
机构
[1] Zdravstveno veleuciliste, Mlinarska cesta 38, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Sveuciliste Rijeci, Filozofski Fak, Odsjek psihologiju, Rijeka, Croatia
来源
PSIHOLOGIJSKE TEME | 2023年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
moral foundations; construct and criterion validity; confirmatory factor analysis; MFQ reliability; INTUITIVE ETHICS; ORIENTATION; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.31820/pt.32.3.11
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Over the past two decades, Moral foundations theory (Haidt & Joseph, 2004) has increasingly become a leading theory in the field of moral psychology. According to this theory, there are five basic moral foundations: care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and sanctity. In addition, there are also higher-level foundations: individualizing foundations (including care and fairness) and binding foundations (including authority, loyalty, and sanctity). To examine individuals' acceptance of different types of moral foundations, the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (Graham et al., 2011) was developed and originally validated in the U.S. population and later in other samples around the world. Results show that in some samples, the appropriate five-factor structure consists of basic moral foundations, while in others, the appropriate two-factor structure consists of higher-order foundations. Considering the cross-cultural sensitivity of measuring moral dimensions, the main objective of this study is to investigate the appropriateness of the two factor structures of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire on a Croatian sample (two-factor and five-factor structure). The study included 433 participants with a mean age of 21.72 (SD = 4.1) years. In addition to demographic data, political orientation, and level of religiosity, participants completed the Moral Foundations Questionnaire and the Attitudes Toward Homosexuality Scale to examine criterion validity. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to determine the most appropriate model of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire for the Croatian population. The results show that the originally proposed five-factor structure (care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and sanctity) is not suitable, while the two-factor structure (individualizing and binding) with high reliability coefficients for both dimensions proved to be more suitable for use in the Croatian sample. The results suggest that the Moral Foundations Questionnaire should be considered as a two-factor structure and is suitable for future measurements of moral foundations in the Croatian sample.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 633
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Does an Abstract Mind-Set Increase the Internal Consistency of Moral Attitudes and Strengthen Individualizing Foundations?
    Alper, Sinan
    Yilmaz, Onurcan
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2020, 11 (03) : 326 - 335
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, Drustvena istrazivanja: Casopis za opca drustvena pitanja, DOI DOI 10.5559/DI.25.3.06
  • [3] Brown T.A., 2015, Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research
  • [4] Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of 'morality-as-cooperation' with a new questionnaire
    Curry, Oliver Scott
    Chesters, Matthew Jones
    Van Lissa, Caspar J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2019, 78 : 106 - 124
  • [5] Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire Independent Scale Validation in a New Zealand Sample
    Davies, Caitlin L.
    Sibley, Chris G.
    Liu, James H.
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 45 (06) : 431 - 436
  • [6] Validation of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire with three Chinese ethnic groups
    Du, Jun
    [J]. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2019, 47 (08):
  • [7] Field A., 2013, DISCOVERING STAT USI, V4th ed
  • [8] Using Moral Foundations to Predict Voting Behavior: Regression Models from the 2012 US Presidential Election
    Franks, Andrew S.
    Scherr, Kyle C.
    [J]. ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 15 (01) : 213 - 232
  • [9] Gilligan C., 1982, In a different voice
  • [10] Mapping the Moral Domain
    Graham, Jesse
    Nosek, Brian A.
    Haidt, Jonathan
    Iyer, Ravi
    Koleva, Spassena
    Ditto, Peter H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (02) : 366 - 385