The Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition

被引:0
|
作者
Rogers, Miranda J. [1 ]
Ou, Zhining [2 ]
Clawson, Jordan W. [1 ]
Presson, Angela P. [2 ]
Stockburger, Christopher L. [3 ]
Kazmers, Nikolas H. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Utah, Div Epidemiol, Dept Internal Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Orthopaed & Spine Ctr Rockies, Ft Collins, CO USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Orthopaed, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME | 2023年 / 48卷 / 12期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Improvement; ligament reconstruction tendon interposition; LRTI; mid-term out-comes; PROMIS UE CAT; QuickDASH/QDASH; satisfaction; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; BASAL JOINT ARTHRITIS; PREOPERATIVE EXPECTATIONS; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; THUMB; CARE; HAND; OSTEOARTHRITIS; TRAPEZIECTOMY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.08.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on an outcomes instrument and reporting satisfaction with surgical outcomes are not equivalent. We hypothesized that improvement exceeding the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT MCID is associated with a greater likelihood of reporting satisfaction with ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) treatment. Our secondary hypothesis was that a subset of patients failing to meet MCID would still be satisfied.Methods Patients >= 1 year after LRTI at one academic tertiary institution were included. QuickDASH and UE CAT v1.2 scores were obtained before and after surgery. Postoperative satisfaction and levels of improvement in pain and function were also obtained.Results A total of 93 patients completed the QuickDASH, and of those, 90 also completed the UE CAT. At a mean of 2.6 +/- 1.0 years after surgery, QuickDASH and UE CAT score improvement exceeded the previously published MCID estimates of 8.8 and 4.8. Although 90% (84/93) of the patients reported satisfaction, only 85% (72/93) and 72% (59/90) achieved MCID on the QuickDASH and UE CAT, respectively. Using the MCID estimate of 8.8, 96% (72/75) of the patients meeting the MCID were satisfied with their treatment. Those failing to achieve MCID reported significantly less physical function and pain improvement; however, most were satisfied nonetheless (68% [13/19] for QuickDASH, 77% [23/30] for UE CAT).Conclusions Achieving published MCID thresholds on the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 was predictive of patients reporting general satisfaction with their LRTI outcome >1 year after surgery. Most patients failing to achieve MCID still reported satisfaction with their LRTI. Achieving MCID thresholds alone should not be used as a surrogate for patient satisfaction with their treatment. Patient satisfaction is a complicated construct that is potentially very different from that of high-quality care.
引用
收藏
页码:1218 / 1228
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes do not vary by BMI class in total hip arthroplasty
    Nickelas Huffman
    Ignacio Pasqualini
    Roberta E. Redfern
    Trevor G. Murray
    Matthew E. Deren
    Craig L. Israelite
    Charles L. Nelson
    Dave Van Andel
    Jason M. Cholewa
    Mike B. Anderson
    Alison K. Klika
    John P. McLaughlin
    Nicolas S. Piuzzi
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2024, 34 : 1979 - 1985
  • [42] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Elective Cranial Neurosurgery
    Reponen, Elina
    Tuominen, Hanna
    Hernesniemi, Juha
    Korja, Miikka
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (06) : 1845 - 1851
  • [43] Is Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty Predictable Using Patient Characteristics and Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes?
    Pronk, Yvette
    Peters, Maud C. W. M.
    Brinkman, Justus-Martijn
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (07): : 2458 - 2465
  • [44] Association between patient choice of provider and patient-reported experience
    Kim, Do Hee
    Kim, Bomgyeol
    Jang, Suk-Yong
    Lee, Sang Gyu
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 35 (04)
  • [45] Functional outcome of ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition after failed first carpometacarpal joint prosthesis
    Anthonissen, Lyne
    Van Eynde, Elke
    Van Nuffel, Maarten
    De Smet, Luc
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2021, 87 (01): : 137 - 142
  • [46] Patient-reported outcomes after Silastic replacement of the trapezium for osteoarthritis
    Burke, N. G.
    Walsh, J.
    Moran, C. J.
    Cousins, G.
    Molony, D.
    Kelly, E. P.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2012, 37E (03) : 263 - 268
  • [47] Systematic Comparison of Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition and Suture-Button Suspensionplasty for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis
    Wininger, Austin E.
    Orozco, Erin I.
    Han, Alex
    Burn, Matthew B.
    Liberman, Shari R.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2023, 18 (07): : 1069 - 1079
  • [48] Patient-reported and patient-weighted outcomes in ophthalmology
    Scheibler, F.
    Finger, R. P.
    Grosselfinger, R.
    Dintsios, C. -M.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2010, 107 (03): : 235 - 240
  • [49] A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Mobilization Protocols Following Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition
    Hutchinson, Douglas T.
    Sueoka, Stephanie
    Wang, Angela A.
    Tyser, Andrew R.
    Papi-Baker, Kathleen
    Kazmers, Nikolas H.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 100 (15): : 1275 - 1280
  • [50] Surgical Outcomes of Suspension Arthroplasty with Dermal Allograft Interposition after Trapeziectomy: Comparison with Ligament Reconstruction and Interposition Using the Flexor Carpi Radialis Tendon
    Choi, Shin Woo
    Bae, Joo-Yul
    Lee, Hyun June
    Park, Ha Sung
    Kim, Yun Jae
    Kim, Jae Kwang
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2025, 17 (02) : 317 - 323