Understanding privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics using a systematic review

被引:10
作者
Liu, Qinyi [1 ,2 ]
Khalil, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Ctr Sci Learning & Technol SLATE, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Ctr Sci Learning & Technol SLATE, Christiesgate 12, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
关键词
data protection; learning analytics; privacy; systematic review; trustworthy; BIG DATA; PRINCIPLES;
D O I
10.1111/bjet.13388
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The field of learning analytics has advanced from infancy stages into a more practical domain, where tangible solutions are being implemented. Nevertheless, the field has encountered numerous privacy and data protection issues that have garnered significant and growing attention. In this systematic review, four databases were searched concerning privacy and data protection issues of learning analytics. A final corpus of 47 papers published in top educational technology journals was selected after running an eligibility check. An analysis of the final corpus was carried out to answer the following three research questions: (1) What are the privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics? (2) What are the similarities and differences between the views of stakeholders from different backgrounds on privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics? (3) How have previous approaches attempted to address privacy and data protection issues? The results of the systematic review show that there are eight distinct, intertwined privacy and data protection issues that cut across the learning analytics cycle. There are both cross-regional similarities and three sets of differences in stakeholder perceptions towards privacy and data protection in learning analytics. With regard to previous attempts to approach privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics, there is a notable dearth of applied evidence, which impedes the assessment of their effectiveness. The findings of our paper suggest that privacy and data protection issues should not be relaxed at any point in the implementation of learning analytics, as these issues persist throughout the learning analytics development cycle. One key implication of this review suggests that solutions to privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics should be more evidence-based, thereby increasing the trustworthiness of learning analytics and its usefulness.Practitioner notesWhat is already known about this topicResearch on privacy and data protection in learning analytics has become a recognised challenge that hinders the further expansion of learning analytics.Proposals to counter the privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics are blurry; there is a lack of a summary of previously proposed solutions.What this study contributesEstablishment of what privacy and data protection issues exist at different phases of the learning analytics cycle.Identification of how different stakeholders view privacy, similarities and differences, and what factors influence their views.Evaluation and comparison of previously proposed solutions that attempt to address privacy and data protection in learning analytics.Implications for practice and/or policyPrivacy and data protection issues need to be viewed in the context of the entire cycle of learning analytics.Stakeholder views on privacy and data protection in learning analytics have commonalities across contexts and differences that can arise within the same context. Before implementing learning analytics, targeted research should be conducted with stakeholders.Solutions that attempt to address privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics should be put into practice as far as possible to better test their usefulness.
引用
收藏
页码:1715 / 1747
页数:33
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] Co-Designing for Privacy, Transparency, and Trust in K-12 Learning Analytics
    Ahn, June
    Campos, Fabio
    Nguyen, Ha
    Hays, Maria
    Morrison, Jan
    [J]. LAK21 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE, 2021, : 55 - 65
  • [2] Student Perceptions of Their Privacy in Leaning Analytics Applications
    Arnold, Kimberly E.
    Sclater, Niall
    [J]. SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE CONFERENCE (LAK'17), 2017, : 66 - 69
  • [3] Bennett CJ, 2008, PRIVACY ADVOCATES: RESISTING THE SPREAD OF SURVEILLANCE, P1
  • [4] Botnevik S., 2021, Student perceptions of privacy in learning analytics: A quantitative study of Norwegian students
  • [5] Carrera-Rivera Angela, 2022, MethodsX, V9, P101895, DOI 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101895
  • [6] Clarke Jane, 2011, Evid Based Nurs, V14, P64, DOI 10.1136/ebn.2011.0049
  • [7] Cook David A, 2006, Am J Med, V119
  • [8] Cormack A. N., 2022, J LEARN ANAL, V9, DOI [10.18608/jla.2022.7533, DOI 10.18608/JLA.2022.7533]
  • [9] Crowther K., 2022, CYBERSECURITY MARATH
  • [10] Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems
    Darvishi, Ali
    Khosravi, Hassan
    Sadiq, Shazia
    Gasevic, Dragan
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 53 (04) : 844 - 875