The effects of psychosocial and behavioral interventions on depressive and anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
作者
He, Jiali [1 ]
Lin, Jingxia [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Wen [1 ]
Cheung, Teris [2 ,4 ]
Cao, Yuan [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Eugene [1 ]
Chan, Sunny H. W. [3 ]
Tsang, Hector W. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Rehabil Sci, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Mental Hlth Res Ctr, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ West England, Sch Hlth & Social Wellbeing, Bristol, England
[4] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Nursing, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
MENTAL-HEALTH; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; GENERAL-POPULATION; SOMATIC DISORDERS; THERAPY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; EMOTION; BIAS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-45839-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Psychosocial and behavioral interventions have been shown to significantly reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms in different populations. Recent evidence suggests that the mental health of the general population has deteriorated significantly since the start of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the therapeutic effects of psychosocial and behavioral interventions on depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. We systematically searched six electronic databases between December 2019 and February 2022 including PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang Data. We included randomized clinical trials of psychosocial and behavioral interventions in individuals with depressive or anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 outbreak compared to various control conditions. A total of 35 eligible studies with 5457 participants were included. The meta-analysis results showed that psychosocial and behavioral interventions had statistically significant moderate effects on depression [SMD = - 0.73, 95% CI (- 1.01, - 0.45), I2 = 90%] and large effects on anxiety [SMD = - 0.90, 95% CI (- 1.19, - 0.60), I2 = 92%], especially in the general population and COVID-19 survivors. Exercise and cognitive behavioral therapy were found to be the most effective treatments with moderate-to-large effect size for depression and anxiety during the outbreak of COVID-19. We also found the internet-based approach could also achieve almost equally significant effects on depression and anxiety compared with face-to-face traditional approach. Our findings suggest that cognitive behavioral therapy and physical exercise intervention are significantly effective for depression and anxiety related to the COVID-19 pandemic regardless of the delivery modes, and gender differences should be taken into consideration for better implementation of interventions in clinical and community practice.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews
    Amir-Behghadami, Mehrdad
    Janati, Ali
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2020, 37 (06) : 387 - 387
  • [2] Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Andersson, Gerhard
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Carlbring, Per
    Riper, Heleen
    Hedman, Erik
    [J]. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 13 (03) : 288 - 295
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, Prevention of mental disorders: Effective interventions and policy options: A summary report
  • [4] A Mobile Phone-Based Intervention to Reduce Mental Health Problems in Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic (PsyCovidApp): Randomized Controlled Trial
    Antonia Fiol-DeRoque, Maria
    Jesus Serrano-Ripoll, Maria
    Jimenez, Rafael
    Zamanillo-Campos, Rocio
    Maria Yanez-Juan, Aina
    Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
    Leiva, Alfonso
    Gervilla, Elena
    Esther Garcia-Buades, M.
    Garcia-Toro, Mauro
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe
    Ruiz-Perez, Isabel
    Sitges, Carolina
    Garcia-Campayo, Javier
    Llobera-Canaves, Joan
    Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2021, 9 (05):
  • [5] Prevalence of mental disorders based on general population surveys
    Baumeister, Harald
    Haerter, Martin
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 42 (07) : 537 - 546
  • [6] Online-Delivered Group and Personal Exercise Programs to Support Low Active Older Adults' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Beauchamp, Mark R.
    Hulteen, Ryan M.
    Ruissen, Geralyn R.
    Liu, Yan
    Rhodes, Ryan E.
    Wierts, Colin M.
    Waldhauser, Katrina J.
    Harden, Samantha H.
    Puterman, Eli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (07)
  • [7] OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS
    BEGG, CB
    MAZUMDAR, M
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) : 1088 - 1101
  • [8] A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
    Borenstein, Michael
    Hedges, Larry V.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Rothstein, Hannah R.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (02) : 97 - 111
  • [9] Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-Intensity Training on Stress, Depression, Anxiety, and Resilience in Healthy Adults During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Confinement: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Borrega-Mouquinho, Yolanda
    Sanchez-Gomez, Jesus
    Pedro Fuentes-Garcia, Juan
    Collado-Mateo, Daniel
    Villafaina, Santos
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [10] The Combined Effect of Exercise and Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bourbeau, Kelsey
    Moriarty, Terence
    Ayanniyi, Akeisha
    Zuhl, Micah
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (07)