Usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome system linked to an electronic chemotherapy prescribing and patient management system for patients with cancer

被引:4
作者
McMullan, Christel [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Hughes, Sarah E. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Calvert, Melanie [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Ctr Patient Reported Outcomes Res, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Surg Reconstruct & Microbiol Res Ctr, Birmingham, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Birmingham Biomed Res Ctr, Birmingham, England
[5] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Birmingham Oxford Blood & Transplant Res Unit, Birmingham, England
[6] Care Res NIHR Appl Res Collaborat West Midlands, Natl Inst Hlth, Birmingham, England
[7] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Hlth Partners Ctr Regulatory Sci & Inno, Birmingham, England
关键词
Usability study; Electronic patient reported outcomes; Cancer; Think aloud; COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA; ADVERSE EVENTS; SYMPTOM; COMPUTER; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16453
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: People affected by cancer experience a wide range of symptoms which have a major impact on their functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). One way to measure the impact of cancer symptoms is through the use of patient-reported outcomes.Methods: An electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) application (ChemoPRO & REG;) was designed to be used by cancer patients to report their symptoms and communicate with their clinical team. Usability testing sessions were conducted with people with lived experience of cancer to understand how real users interact with the ChemoPRO & REG; system. One-to-one testing sessions were conducted to assess use of the system and identify areas for further refinement. User satisfaction was assessed using a brief satisfaction questionnaire previously used by Aiyegbusi et al. (date). Results: Ten people with lived experience of cancer took part in the usability study. Symptoms and HRQoL measures, including the Euroqol EQ5D5L and the PRO-CTCAETM were included in the ePRO system.Participants: had a mean age of 62.3 years. Three critical errors and 21 non-critical errors were reported. All participants were enthusiastic about the app. Participants liked the simplicity and responsiveness of the patient-facing app and highlighted the potential for communicating with their clinical team. The overall usability and satisfaction score was 4.5 (sd = 0.09).Conclusion: This usability study suggests that people with lived experience of cancer found the ChemoPRO & REG; app acceptable and easy to use. One of the key features of this particular ePRO system that should be developed further is system functionality to facilitate communication between patients and clinicians. Future testing should include testing in a clinical setting and testing with people from ethnic minorities.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection [J].
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee ;
Roydhouse, Jessica ;
Rivera, Samantha Cruz ;
Kamudoni, Paul ;
Schache, Peter ;
Wilson, Roger ;
Stephens, Richard ;
Calvert, Melanie .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
[2]   Key methodological considerations for usability testing of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems [J].
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (02) :325-333
[3]   Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease [J].
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee ;
Kyte, Derek ;
Cockwell, Paul ;
Marshall, Tom ;
Dutton, Mary ;
Walmsley-Allen, Natalie ;
Auti, Ram ;
Calvert, Melanie .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 101 :120-127
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, USABILITY ENG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts (BS EN ISO 9241-11:2018)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DETERMINING CORRECT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2023, WHY YOU ONLY NEED TE
[8]   Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: results of a questionnaire-based study [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Iasonos, Alexia ;
McDonough, Tiffani ;
Barz, Allison ;
Culkin, Ann ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Scher, Howard I. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2006, 7 (11) :903-909
[9]   Clinical Utility and User Perceptions of a Digital System for Electronic Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Care: Findings From the PRO-TECT Trial [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Stover, Angela M. ;
Schrag, Deborah ;
Chung, Arlene ;
Jansen, Jennifer ;
Henson, Sydney ;
Carr, Philip ;
Ginos, Brenda ;
Deal, Allison ;
Spears, Patricia A. ;
Jonsson, Mattias ;
Bennett, Antonia V. ;
Mody, Gita ;
Thanarajasingam, Gita ;
Rogak, Lauren J. ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Snyder, Claire ;
Kottschade, Lisa A. ;
Charlot, Marjory ;
Weiss, Anna ;
Bruner, Deborah ;
Dueck, Amylou C. .
JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2020, 4 :947-957
[10]   Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Deal, Allison M. ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Scher, Howard I. ;
Hudis, Clifford A. ;
Sabbatini, Paul ;
Rogak, Lauren ;
Bennett, Antonia V. ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Atkinson, Thomas M. ;
Chou, Joanne F. ;
Dulko, Dorothy ;
Sit, Laura ;
Barz, Allison ;
Novotny, Paul ;
Fruscione, Michael ;
Sloan, Jeff A. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (06) :557-+