Development and validation of the ICAP Technology Scale to measure how teachers integrate technology into learning activities

被引:48
作者
Antonietti, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Schmitz, Maria -Luisa [1 ]
Consoli, Tessa [1 ]
Cattaneo, Alberto [2 ]
Gonon, Philipp [1 ]
Petko, Dominik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich UZH, Inst Educ, Freiestr 36, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Univ Vocat Educ & Training SFUVET, Via Besso 84, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
technology use; ICAP; Learning activities; Cognitive engagement; MODEL; METAANALYSIS; ACCEPTANCE; FRAMEWORK; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104648
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Previous research investigating the use of technology in school has focused mainly on the fre-quency of use of digital tools during lessons rather than investigating how technology is inte-grated with respect to different kinds of learning activities.Since the impact of technology use on learning depends on how it is used and on what activities supported by technology are implemented in lessons, a measurement instrument assessing how technology is integrated into learning activities is necessary to investigate its impact on teaching and learning processes. According to the interactive, constructive, active, and passive (ICAP) framework, which distinguishes four different learning activities based on the level of students' cognitive engagement, we developed the 12-item ICAP Technology Scale (ICAP-TS) that accounts for all four dimensions of technology integration in lessons. We used confirmatory factor analysis to validate the four-factor structure of the ICAP-TS with a sample of 1050 upper-secondary school teachers from Switzerland. We also examined reliability using classical test theory and Rasch model analysis to assess the scale's psychometric characteristics. We then analyzed the associa-tions between the ICAP-TS and a general use frequency measure of 12 educational technologies to test the criterion validity. The results confirmed the four-factor structure of the ICAP-TS and revealed good instrument accuracy. The most difficult items to endorse are those describing the integration of technology into interactive learning activities. Furthermore, all 12 items signifi-cantly correlated with the frequency of use of 12 educational technologies. We recommend the ICAP-TS as a short and reliable measurement scale for assessing how technology is integrated into lessons, considering different learning activities based on the ICAP theoretical model.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Adams R. J., 2006, RELIABILITY ITEM RES
[2]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[3]  
Andrich D., 2019, A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory: Measuring in the Educational, Social and Health Sciences
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, INEQUALITIES DIGITAL, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264239555-8-EN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
[6]   Variability of teachers' technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility! [J].
Backfisch, Iris ;
Lachner, Andreas ;
Stuermer, Kathleen ;
Scheiter, Katharina .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2021, 166
[7]   Professional knowledge or motivation? Investigating the role of teachers' expertise on the quality of technology-enhanced lesson plans [J].
Backfisch, Iris ;
Lachner, Andreas ;
Hische, Christoff ;
Loose, Frank ;
Scheiter, Katharina .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2020, 66
[8]  
Baghaei P., 2008, RASCH MEASUREMENT T, V21, P1105
[9]  
Bond T., 2001, Applying Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences
[10]  
Bond T. G., 2015, APPL RASCH MODEL FUN, DOI [10.4324/9781315814698, DOI 10.4324/9781315814698]