Endogenous Long-Term Productivity Performance in Advanced Countries: A Novel Two-Dimensional Fuzzy-Monte Carlo Approach

被引:1
作者
Antunes, Jorge [1 ]
Aye, Goodness C. [2 ]
Gupta, Rangan [2 ]
Wanke, Peter [1 ]
Tan, Yong [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, COPPEAD Grad Business Sch, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Pretoria, Dept Econ, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Univ Bradford, Sch Management, Bradford BD7 1DP, West Yorkshire, England
关键词
Productivity and competitiveness; endogeneity; type-2 fuzzy sets; 2DFMC; stochastic performance; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; GROWTH; FRONTIER; BANKING; TOPSIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1142/S021848852450003X
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Better performance at a country level will provide benefits to the whole population. This issue has been studied from various perspectives using empirical methods. However, little effort has as yet been made to address the issue of endogeneity in the interrelationships between productive performance and its determinants. We address this issue by proposing a Two-Dimensional Fuzzy-Monte Carlo Analysis (2DFMC) approach. The joint use of stochastic and fuzzy approaches - within the ambit of 2DFMCA - offers methodological tools to mitigate epistemic uncertainty while increasing research validity and reproducibility: (i) preliminary performance assessment by fuzzy ideal solutions; and (ii) robust stochastic regression of the performance scores into the epistemic sources of uncertainty related to the levels of physical and human capitals measured in distinct countries at different epochs. By applying the proposed method to a sample of 23 countries for 1890-2018, our results show that the best and worst-performing countries were Norway and Portugal, respectively. We further found that the intensity of human capital and the age of equipment (capital stock) have different impacts on productive performance - it has been established that capital intensity and total factor productivity are influenced by productivity performance, which, in turn, has a negative impact on labor productivity and GDP per capita. Our analysis provides insights to enable government policies to coordinate productive performance and other macroeconomic indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 83
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Amendola M., 2005, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, V16, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2003.07.001
[2]   Bank efficiency estimation in China: DEA-RENNA approach [J].
Antunes, Jorge ;
Hadi-Vencheh, Abdollah ;
Jamshidi, Ali ;
Tan, Yong ;
Wanke, Peter .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 315 (02) :1373-1398
[3]   Nonlinearities in productivity growth: A semi-parametric panel analysis [J].
Azomahou, Theophile T. ;
Diene, Bity ;
Diene, Mbaye .
STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2013, 24 :45-75
[4]   A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Otaghsara, S. Khanmohammadi ;
Yazdani, Morteza ;
Ignatius, Joshua .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (17) :13051-13069
[5]  
Bergeaud A., 2017, International Productivity Monitor
[6]   Productivity Trends in Advanced Countries between 1890 and 2012 [J].
Bergeaud, Antonin ;
Cette, Gilbert ;
Lecat, Remy .
REVIEW OF INCOME AND WEALTH, 2016, 62 (03) :420-444
[7]  
Blanchard O., 2017, Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief PB, P17
[8]   Do competitively acquired funds induce universities to increase productivity? [J].
Bolli, Thomas ;
Somogyi, Frank .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (01) :136-147
[9]  
Broadberry S., 2005, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, V16, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2004.11.003
[10]   Productivity growth and structural change in China (1995-2009): A subsystems analysis [J].
Brondino, Gabriel .
STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2019, 49 :183-191