An Item Response Theory Model for Incorporating Response Times in Forced-Choice Measures

被引:3
|
作者
Guo, Zhichen [1 ]
Wang, Daxun [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Yan [1 ]
Tu, Dongbo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Nanchang, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, 99 Ziyang Ave, Nanchang 330022, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
forced-choice; response time; Thurstonian item response theory model; information entropy; log-linear model; Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm; PAIRWISE-PREFERENCE; VALIDITY; IRT; LATENCIES; SELF; SELECTION; FAKERS; TRANSFORMATION; INVENTORY; FAKING;
D O I
10.1177/00131644231171193
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Forced-choice (FC) measures have been widely used in many personality or attitude tests as an alternative to rating scales, which employ comparative rather than absolute judgments. Several response biases, such as social desirability, response styles, and acquiescence bias, can be reduced effectively. Another type of data linked with comparative judgments is response time (RT), which contains potential information concerning respondents' decision-making process. It would be challenging but exciting to combine RT into FC measures better to reveal respondents' behaviors or preferences in personality measurement. Given this situation, this study aims to propose a new item response theory (IRT) model that incorporates RT into FC measures to improve personality assessment. Simulation studies show that the proposed model can effectively improve the estimation accuracy of personality traits with the ancillary information contained in RT. Also, an application on a real data set reveals that the proposed model estimates similar but different parameter values compared with the conventional Thurstonian IRT model. The RT information can explain these differences.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 480
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Model Choice and Sample Size in Item Response Theory Analysis of Aphasia Tests
    Hula, William D.
    Fergadiotis, Gerasimos
    Martin, Nadine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2012, 21 (02) : S38 - S50
  • [32] Traditional scores versus IRT estimates on forced-choice tests based on a dominance model
    Hontangas, Pedro M.
    Leenen, Iwin
    de la Torre, Jimmy
    Ponsoda, Vicente
    Morillo, Daniel
    Abad, Francisco J.
    PSICOTHEMA, 2016, 28 (01) : 76 - 82
  • [33] The roles of stimulus and response uncertainty in forced-choice performance: an amendment to Hick/Hyman Law
    Tim Wifall
    Eliot Hazeltine
    J. Toby Mordkoff
    Psychological Research, 2016, 80 : 555 - 565
  • [34] Can Forced-Choice Response Format Reduce Faking of Socially Aversive Personality Traits?
    Valone, Amanda L. Y.
    Meade, Adam W.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2024, 106 (06) : 819 - 831
  • [35] Contributions to Constructing Forced-Choice Questionnaires Using the Thurstonian IRT Model
    Sun, Luning
    Qin, Zijie
    Wang, Shan
    Tian, Xuetao
    Luo, Fang
    MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2024, 59 (02) : 229 - 250
  • [36] Modeling Faking in the Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format: The Faking Mixture Model
    Frick, Susanne
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2022, 87 (02) : 773 - 794
  • [37] A Latent Space Diffusion Item Response Theory Model to Explore Conditional Dependence between Responses and Response Times
    Inhan Kang
    Minjeong Jeon
    Ivailo Partchev
    Psychometrika, 2023, 88 : 830 - 864
  • [38] A Latent Space Diffusion Item Response Theory Model to Explore Conditional Dependence between Responses and Response Times
    Kang, Inhan
    Jeon, Minjeong
    Partchev, Ivailo
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2023, 88 (03) : 830 - 864
  • [39] Item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing for forced-choice items using Thurstonian IRT model
    Wang, Qin
    Zheng, Yi
    Liu, Kai
    Cai, Yan
    Peng, Siwei
    Tu, Dongbo
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2024, 56 (02) : 600 - 614
  • [40] An Investigation of Emotional Intelligence Measures Using Item Response Theory
    Cho, Seonghee
    Drasgow, Fritz
    Cao, Mengyang
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2015, 27 (04) : 1241 - 1252