A fast emergency department triage score based on mobility, mental status and oxygen saturation compared with the emergency severity index: a prospective cohort study

被引:9
作者
Riedel, H. B. [1 ]
Espejo, T. [1 ]
Bingisser, R. [1 ]
Kellett, J. [2 ]
Nickel, C. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Basel, Emergency Dept, Petersgraben 2, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, JB Winslows Vej 4, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
关键词
REDUCE; SCALE;
D O I
10.1093/qjmed/hcad160
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Waiting for triage in overburdened emergency departments (ED) has become an increasing problem, which endangers patients. A fast triage system to rapidly identify low-acuity patients should divert care and resources to more urgent cases. Aim The objective of this study was to compare the performance of the Kitovu Hospital fast triage (KFT) score with the Emergency Severity Index (ESI), using mortality and hospital admission as proxies for the patients' acuity. Design This is a prospective observational study of consecutive patients presenting to a Swiss academic ED. Methods Patients were prospectively triaged into one of five ESI strata and retrospectively assessed by the KFT score, which awards one point each for altered mental status, impaired mobility and oxygen saturation Results The KFT score had a lower discrimination than the ESI for hospital admission, but a higher discrimination for mortality from 24 h to 1 year after ED presentation. A total of 5544 (67%) patients were assigned to the lowest acuity by the KFT score compared with 2374 (28.7%) by the ESI; there was no significant difference in the 24-h mortality of patients who were deemed low acuity by either score. Conclusion Compared to the ESI, the KFT score identifies more than twice as many patients at low risk of early death. Therefore, this score might help to identify patients who could be managed through alternative pathways. This may be particularly helpful in situations of ED crowding and access block.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 780
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Ann Emerg Med, V81, pe9, DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.11.006
[2]   Systematically assessed symptoms as outcome predictors in emergency patients [J].
Bingisser, R. ;
Dietrich, M. ;
Ortega, R. Nieves ;
Malinovska, A. ;
Bosia, T. ;
Nickel, C. H. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 45 :8-12
[3]   Physicians' Disease Severity Ratings are Non-Inferior to the Emergency Severity Index [J].
Bingisser, Roland ;
Baerlocher, Severin Manuel ;
Kuster, Tobias ;
Ortega, Ricardo Nieves ;
Nickel, Christian H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (03)
[4]   Predicting inhospital admission at the emergency department: a systematic review [J].
Brink, Anniek ;
Alsma, Jelmer ;
van Attekum, Lodewijk A. A. M. ;
Bramer, Wichor M. ;
Zietse, Robert ;
Lingsma, Hester ;
Schuit, Stephanie C. E. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2022, 39 (03) :191-198
[5]   How accurate is the AVPU scale in detecting neurological impairment when used by general ward nurses? An evaluation study using simulation and a questionnaire [J].
Brunker, Chris ;
Harris, Ruth .
INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2015, 31 (02) :69-75
[6]  
Busch Jeannette-Marie, 2022, Int J Clin Pract, V2022, P7281693, DOI 10.1155/2022/7281693
[7]   Can a reverse triage clinical decision support tool create sufficient surge capacity and reduce emergency department crowding? [J].
De Bondt, Frieda ;
Pollaris, Gwen ;
Sabbe, Marc B. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 29 (01) :16-17
[8]  
Gilboy N, 2012, Emergency Severity Index, Version 4: Implementation Handbook
[9]   Comment on the Validity of Emergency Department Triage Tools [J].
Grossmann, F. F. ;
Bingisser, R. ;
Nickel, C. H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (09) :1376-1376
[10]   Transporting Clinical Tools to New Settings: Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Emergency Severity Index in German [J].
Grossmann, Florian F. ;
Nickel, Christian H. ;
Christ, Michael ;
Schneider, Kristian ;
Spirig, Rebecca ;
Bingisser, Roland .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 57 (03) :257-264