Influence of obesity on osseointegration of implants with different surface treatments: A preclinical study

被引:2
|
作者
Silva, Bruno Luis Graciliano [1 ]
Sanchez-Puetate, Julio Cesar [1 ]
Pinotti, Felipe Eduardo [1 ]
Marcantonio, Camila Chierici [1 ]
Pedroso, Gabriel Gimenez [1 ]
Marcantonio Junior, Elcio [1 ]
Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chierici [1 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Sch Dent Araraquara, Dept Diag & Surg, Araraquara, Brazil
关键词
bone; dental implants; obesity; osseointegration; surface properties; BONE APPOSITION; SLA; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13234
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of obesity on the osseointegration of implants with hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. Materials and MethodsSixty-four male rats were distributed among four experimental groups: H-HB (Healthy/Hydrophobic): healthy animals with hydrophobic implants; H-HL (Healthy/Hydrophilic): healthy animals with hydrophilic implants; O-HB (Obese/Hydrophobic): animals with induced obesity and hydrophobic implants; O-HL (Obese/Hydrophilic): animals with induced obesity and hydrophilic implants. One hundred and twenty-eight implants were installed in the tibiae of the animals bilaterally (64 on the left tibiae and 64 on the right one) after 75 days of a specific diet (standard or high-fat diet) and euthanasia was performed in the experimental periods of 15 and 45 days after implant placement. Bone formation was assessed by biomechanical analysis (on the left tibiae of each animal), and microtomographic and histomorphometric analyses (on the right tibiae of each animal). Statistical analysis was performed using the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality and ANOVA followed by Tukey test to observe whether there was a significant difference between groups (p < 0.05); the t-test was used to compare the animals' body weight. ResultsThe biomechanical analysis showed an increase in the removal torque value of animals after 45 days in comparison to after 15 days, with the exception of O-HB groups. The microtomographic analysis demonstrated no significant differences in the mineralized bone tissue volume between the groups. In the histomorphometric analysis, the H-HL/45 day group/period demonstrated higher bone-implant contact, in comparison to H-HL/15 days and the O-HL/45 day group/period showed an increase in bone area between the implant threads, in comparison to O-HL/15 days. ConclusionIn conclusion, obesity does not interfere with the osseointegration of hydrophobic and hydrophilic implants.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 928
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration
    Le Guehennec, L.
    Soueidan, A.
    Layrolle, P.
    Amouriq, Y.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2007, 23 (07) : 844 - 854
  • [2] Influence of chitosan and Cissus quandrangularis coating on osseointegration in titanium implants in rabbits: A preclinical in vivo study
    Roy, Treasa Richa
    Nelogi, Santosh
    Chowdhary, Ramesh
    Naik, Veena V.
    Peter, Meekha
    Santhosh, Varkey Nadakkavukaran
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 125 (03)
  • [3] The effect of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implants with different surface treatments: A study in sheep
    Lahens, Bradley
    Lopez, Christopher D.
    Neiva, Rodrigo F.
    Bowers, Michelle M.
    Jimbo, Ryo
    Bonfante, Estevam A.
    Morcos, Jonathan
    Witek, Lukasz
    Tovar, Nick
    Coelho, Paulo G.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2019, 107 (03) : 615 - 623
  • [4] The Influence of Surface Treatment on Osseointegration of Endosteal Implants Presenting Decompressing Vertical Chambers: An In Vivo Study in Sheep
    Parra, Marcelo
    Benalcazar Jalkh, Ernesto B.
    Tovar, Nick
    Torroni, Andrea
    Badalov, Rafael M.
    Bonfante, Estevam A.
    Nayak, Vasudev
    Castellano, Arthur
    Coelho, Paulo G.
    Witek, Lukasz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2022, 37 (05) : 929 - 936
  • [5] Analysis of osseointegration of implants with hydrophilic surfaces in grafted areas: A Preclinical study
    Pinotti, Felipe E.
    Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira, Guilherme Jose
    Aroni, Mauricio A. T.
    Marcantonio, Rosemary A. C.
    Marcantonio, Elcio
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (10) : 963 - 972
  • [6] Osseointegration of Zirconia Implants with Different Surface Characteristics: An Evaluation in Rabbits
    Hoffmann, Oliver
    Angelov, Nikola
    Zafiropoulos, Gregory-George
    Andreana, Sebastiano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2012, 27 (02) : 352 - 358
  • [7] Early osseointegration driven by the surface chemistry and wettability of dental implants
    Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina
    Neves Novellino Alves, Adriana Terezinha
    Britto Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo
    Calasans-Maia, Jose
    Granjeiro, Jose Mauro
    Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2015, 23 (03) : 279 - 287
  • [8] The influence of high-dose systemic zoledronate administration on osseointegration of implants with different surface topography
    Hou, Michaela
    Lee, Ryan S. B.
    Du, Zhibin
    Hamlet, Stephen M.
    Vaquette, Cedryck
    Ivanovski, Saso
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 54 (06) : 633 - 643
  • [9] Comparison of Osseointegration of Five Different Surfaced Titanium Implants
    Dundar, Serkan
    Yaman, Ferhan
    Bozoglan, Alihan
    Yildirim, Tuba Talo
    Kirtay, Mustafa
    Ozupek, Muhammet Fatih
    Artas, Gokhan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (07) : 1991 - 1995
  • [10] The osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis
    Hao, Chun-Ping
    Cao, Nan-Jue
    Zhu, Yu-He
    Wang, Wei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)