Using Design Thinking to Promote Goals of Care Conversations With Seriously Ill Patients

被引:4
作者
Casarett, David [1 ,6 ]
Lakis, Kristen [2 ]
Ma, Jessica E. [3 ]
Fischer, Jonathan [4 ,5 ]
Ibrahim, Salam [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Duke Hlth, Sch Med, Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Hlth, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Durham VA Hlth Syst,Duke Hlth,Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Duke Hlth, Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth & Family Med, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Populat Hlth Management Off, Durham, NC USA
[6] Duke Univ, Duke Hlth, Sch Med, Dept Med, 40 Med Circle, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
Communication; decision-making; goals of care; ethicstactics; PALLIATIVE CARE; DECISION-MAKING; COMMUNICATION; HEALTH; END; DISCUSSIONS; UNIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.04.010
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Goals of care (GOC) conversations can improve serious illness outcomes such as pain and symptom manage-ment and patient satisfaction.Problem. However, we recognized that very few Duke Health patients who died had a GOC conversation documented in the designated electronic health record (EHR) tab. Therefore, in 2020, we set a target that all Duke Health patients who died should have had a GOC conversation documented in a designated EHR tab in the last 6 months of life.Intervention. In developing a strategy to promote GOC conversations, we used two interwoven approaches. The first was RE -AIM, a model for designing, reporting and evaluating health behavior research. The second was less of a model than a way of approaching problems, known as "design thinking."Outcomes. We employed both of these approaches in a system-wide effort that achieved a 50% prevalence of GOC conversa-tions in the last 6 months of life.Key message. In combination, simple interventions can have a significant impact on behavior change in an academic health system. Lessons learned. We found that design thinking techniques offered a useful bridge between RE-AIM strategy and clinical J Pain Symptom Manage 2023;66:e275-e281.& COPY; 2023 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 281
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Promoting timely goals of care conversations between gynecologic cancer patients at high-risk of death and their providers
    Davidson, Brittany A.
    Puechl, Allison M.
    Watson, Catherine H.
    Lim, Stephanie
    Gatta, Luke
    Monuszko, Karen
    Drury, Kerry
    Ryan, Emma S.
    Rice, Shelley
    Truong, Tracy
    Ma, Jessica
    Power, Steve
    Jordan, Weston
    Kurtovic, Kelli
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 164 (02) : 288 - 294
  • [42] A bioethical framework to guide the decision-making process in the care of seriously ill patients
    Daniel Neves Forte
    Fernando Kawai
    Cláudio Cohen
    BMC Medical Ethics, 19
  • [43] Surgery Residents' Experiences With Seriously-Ill and Dying Patients: An Opportunity to Improve Palliative and End-of-Life Care
    Suwanabol, Pasithorn A.
    Vitous, C. Ann
    Perumalswami, Chithra R.
    Li, Sylvia H.
    Raja, Nicholas
    Dillon, Brendan R.
    Lee, Christina W.
    Forman, Jane
    Silveira, Maria J.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 77 (03) : 582 - 597
  • [44] Interdisciplinary spiritual care for seriously ill and dying patients: A collaborative model
    Puchalski, Christina M.
    Lunsford, Beverly
    Harris, Mary H.
    Miller, Rabbi Tamara
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (05) : 398 - 416
  • [45] Ethical, legal, and communication challenges in managing goals-of-care discussions in chronically critically ill patients
    Siddiqui, Shahla
    Zhang, Wei Wei
    Platzbecker, Katharina
    Douglas, Molly J.
    Rock, Laura K.
    Eikermann, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 63 : 231 - 237
  • [46] Vagueness in Goals-of-Care Conferences for Critically Ill Patients: Types of Hedge Language Used by Physicians
    Mittal, Vaishali
    Hakes, Nicholas A.
    Magnus, David
    Batten, Jason N.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (11) : 1538 - 1546
  • [47] Supportive interventions for family members of very seriously ill patients in inpatient care: A systematic review
    Soikkeli-Jalonen, Anu
    Mishina, Kaisa
    Virtanen, Heli
    Charalambous, Andreas
    Haavisto, Elina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2021, 30 (15-16) : 2179 - 2201
  • [48] Using Electronic Health Records for Quality Measurement and Accountability in Care of the Seriously Ill: Opportunities and Challenges
    Curtis, J. Randall
    Sathitratanacheewin, Seelwan
    Starks, Helene
    Lee, Robert Y.
    Kross, Erin K.
    Downey, Lois
    Sibley, James
    Lober, William
    Loggers, Elizabeth T.
    Fausto, James A.
    Lindvall, Charlotta
    Engelberg, Ruth A.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 21 : S52 - S60
  • [49] Goals-of-care Discussions for Seriously I l l Hospitalized Patients
    King, Kellin
    Song, Soon-IL
    Quill, Timothy
    HOSPITAL MEDICINE CLINICS, 2013, 2 (04) : E574 - E586
  • [50] How doctors manage conflicts with families of critically ill patients during conversations about end-of-life decisions in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care
    Spijkers, Amber S.
    Akkermans, Aranka
    Smets, Ellen M. A.
    Schultz, Marcus J.
    Cherpanath, Thomas G. V.
    van Woensel, Job B. M.
    van Heerde, Marc
    van Kaam, Anton H.
    van de Loo, Moniek
    Willems, Dick L.
    de Vos, Mirjam A.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 48 (07) : 910 - 922