Developing a comprehensive model of the optimal exploitation of dam reservoir by combining a fuzzy-logic based decision-making approach and the young's bilateral bargaining model

被引:1
作者
Shirangi, M. J. [1 ]
Babazadeh, H. [1 ]
Shirangi, E. [2 ]
Saremi, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Water Sci & Engn, Sci & Res Branch, Tehran, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran
来源
MEMBRANE AND WATER TREATMENT | 2023年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
bargaining model; fuzzy decision making; reservoir exploitation; water quality; CONFLICT-RESOLUTION MODEL; WATER-QUALITY ISSUES; OPERATION; MANAGEMENT; TOPSIS; RESOURCES; VIKOR;
D O I
10.12989/mwt.2023.14.2.065
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Given the limited water resources and the presence of multiple decision makers with different and usually conflicting objectives in the exploitation of water resources systems, especially dam's reservoirs; therefore, the decision to determine the optimal allocation of reservoir water among decision-makers and stakeholders is a difficult task. In this study, by combining a fuzzy VIKOR technique or fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (FMCDM) and the Young's bilateral bargaining model, a new method was developed to determine the optimal quantitative and qualitative water allocation of dam's reservoir water with the aim of increasing the utility of decision makers and stakeholders and reducing the conflicts among them. In this study, by identifying the stakeholders involved in the exploitation of the dam reservoir and determining their utility, the optimal points on trade-off curve with quantitative and qualitative objectives presented by Mojarabi et al. (2019) were ranked based on the quantitative and qualitative criteria, and economic, social and environmental factors using the fuzzy VIKOR technique. In the proposed method, the weights of the criteria were determined by each decision maker using the entropy method. The results of a fuzzy decision-making method demonstrated that the Young's bilateral bargaining model was developed to determine the point agreed between the decisions makers on the trade-off curve. In the proposed method, (a) the opinions of decision makers and stakeholders were considered according to different criteria in the exploitation of the dam reservoir, (b) because the decision makers considered the different factors in addition to quantitative and qualitative criteria, they were willing to participate in bargaining and reconsider their ideals, (c) due to the use of a fuzzy-logic based decision-making approach and considering different criteria, the utility of all decision makers was close to each other and the scope of bargaining became smaller, leading to an increase in the possibility of reaching an agreement in a shorter time period using game theory and (d) all qualitative judgments without considering explicitness of the decision makers were applied to the model using the fuzzy logic. The results of using the proposed method for the optimal exploitation of Iran's 15-Khordad dam reservoir over a 30-year period (1968-1997) showed the possibility of the agreement on the water allocation of the monthly total dissolved solids (TDS)=1,490 mg forward slash L considering the different factors based on the opinions of decision makers and reducing conflicts among them.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 76
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [21] Optimal reservoir operation considering the water quality issues: A stochastic conflict resolution approach
    Kerachian, Reza
    Karamouz, Mohammad
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2006, 42 (12)
  • [22] Wave propagation and vibration responses in porous smart nanocomposite sandwich beam resting on Kerr foundation considering structural damping
    Keshtegar, Behrooz
    Motezaker, Mohsen
    Kolahchi, Reza
    Nguyen-Thoi Trung
    [J]. THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2020, 154
  • [23] Dynamic stability response of truncated nanocomposite conical shell with magnetostrictive face sheets utilizing higher order theory of sandwich panels
    Keshtegar, Behrooz
    Farrokhian, Ahmad
    Kolahchi, Reza
    Nguyen-Thoi Trung
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS A-SOLIDS, 2020, 82
  • [24] Multi-Objective Firefly Integration with the K-Nearest Neighbor to Reduce Simulation Model Calls to Accelerate the Optimal Operation of Multi-Objective Reservoirs
    Khorsandi, Mahboubeh
    Ashofteh, Parisa-Sadat
    Azadi, Firoozeh
    Chu, Xuefeng
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (09) : 3283 - 3304
  • [25] A numerical method for magneto-hygro-thermal dynamic stability analysis of defective quadrilateral graphene sheets using higher order nonlocal strain gradient theory with different movable boundary conditions
    Kolahchi, Reza
    Kolahdouzan, Farzad
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2021, 91 : 458 - 475
  • [26] Dynamic buckling optimization of laminated aircraft conical shells with hybrid nanocomposite martial
    Kolahchi, Reza
    Zhu, Shun-Peng
    Keshtegar, Behrooz
    Nguyen-Thoi Trung
    [J]. AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 98
  • [27] Ranking solutions of multi-objective reservoir operation optimization models using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Malekmohammadi, Bahram
    Zahraie, Banafsheh
    Kerachian, Reza
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (06) : 7851 - 7863
  • [28] Modeling of decision-makers negotiations in reservoir operation with respect to water quality and environmental issues
    Mojarabi-Kermani, A. R.
    Shirangi, Ehsan
    Bordbar, Amin
    Bedast, A. A. Kaman
    Masjedi, A. R.
    [J]. MEMBRANE AND WATER TREATMENT, 2018, 9 (06): : 421 - 434
  • [29] Stochastic Optimal Reservoir Operation Management, Applying Group Conflict Resolution Model
    Mojarabi-Kermani, Alireza
    Shirangi, Ehsan
    Bordbar, Amin
    Bedast, Amir Abbas Kaman
    Masjedi, Alireza
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2019, 33 (08) : 2847 - 2865
  • [30] Uncertainty analysis in the application of multi-criteria decision-making methods in Australian strategic environmental decisions
    Mosadeghi, Razieh
    Warnken, Jan
    Tomlinson, Rodger
    Mirfenderesk, Hamid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 56 (08) : 1097 - 1124