Does agricultural water-saving policy improve food security? Evidence from the Yellow River Basin in China

被引:8
作者
Yang, Rui [1 ]
Xu, Hang [2 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Humanities & Dev Studies, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
关键词
Agricultural water-saving policy; China; Difference-in-Differences; Food security; Grain production; CLIMATE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2166/wp.2023.217
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
For our empirical research, the 2012 implementation of China's National Agricultural Water-Saving Outline serves as a quasi-experiment. In addition, one of the main regions in China for grain production is the Yellow River Basin. Based on this, we utilize a Difference-in-Difference (DID) empirical technique to assess the impact of the agricultural water-saving policy on food security using data from prefectures in China's Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2020. According to the estimated results, grain production has greatly increased as a result of the agricultural water-saving policy. This conclusion still holds when other water-related policies are considered. The agricultural water-saving policy may enhance other input factors in grain production by assuring water demand, which is one possible mechanism of the influence. The empirical results show that the policy indeed increases the water productivity in agricultural production, which will ensure the effective water utilization in agricultural production, and the grain sown area, which is the most important production factor in agriculture. In heterogeneity analysis, the impact of the policy on food security is the largest in the lower reach, followed by the middle reach and the smallest in the upper reach in the Yellow River Basin.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 268
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Culture and food security [J].
Alonso, Elena Briones ;
Cockx, Lara ;
Swinnen, Johan .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 17 :113-127
[2]   COVID-19 and food security: Panel data evidence from Nigeria [J].
Amare, Mulubrhan ;
Abay, Kibrom A. ;
Tiberti, Luca ;
Chamberlin, Jordan .
FOOD POLICY, 2021, 101
[3]   Food price volatility and household food security: Evidence from Nigeria [J].
Amolegbe, Khadijat B. ;
Upton, Joanna ;
Bageant, Elizabeth ;
Blom, Sylvia .
FOOD POLICY, 2021, 102
[4]   Climate risk management strategies and food security: Evidence from Cambodian rice farmers [J].
Bairagi, Subir ;
Mishra, Ashok K. ;
Durand-Morat, Alvaro .
FOOD POLICY, 2020, 95
[5]   Impact of climate smart agriculture on food security: An agent-based analysis [J].
Bazzana, Davide ;
Foltz, Jeremy ;
Zhang, Ying .
FOOD POLICY, 2022, 111
[6]   How can agricultural interventions enhance contribution to food security and SDG 2.1? [J].
Bizikova, Livia ;
Jungcurt, Stefan ;
McDougal, Kieran ;
Tyler, Stephen .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 26
[7]   Climate - Food security under climate change [J].
Brown, Molly E. ;
Funk, Christopher C. .
SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (5863) :580-581
[8]   EU policies and global food security [J].
Bureau, Jean-Christophe ;
Swinnen, Johan .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 16 :106-115
[9]   Reducing risks to food security from climate change [J].
Campbell, Bruce M. ;
Vermeulen, Sonja J. ;
Aggarwal, Pramod K. ;
Corner-Dolloff, Caitlin ;
Girvetz, Evan ;
Loboguerrero, Ana Maria ;
Ramirez-Villegas, Julian ;
Rosenstock, Todd ;
Sebastian, Leocadio ;
Thornton, Philip K. ;
Wollenberg, Eva .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 11 :34-43
[10]   The science of food security [J].
Cole, Martin Barry ;
Augustin, Mary Ann ;
Robertson, Michael John ;
Manners, John Michael .
NPJ SCIENCE OF FOOD, 2018, 2 (01)