Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT in recurrent adenocarcinoma gallbladder and its impact on post-recurrence survival

被引:4
作者
Bedmutha, Akshay S. [1 ]
Agrawal, Archi [1 ]
Rangarajan, Venkatesh [1 ]
Goel, Mahesh [2 ]
Patkar, Shraddha [2 ]
Puranik, Ameya D. [1 ]
Ramadwar, Mukta [3 ]
Purandare, Nilendu C. [1 ]
Shah, Sneha [1 ]
Choudhury, Sayak [1 ]
机构
[1] Tata Mem Hosp, Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Dept Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, E Borges Rd, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
[2] Tata Mem Hosp, Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Dept Surg, Gastrointestinal & Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg Se, E Borges Rd, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
[3] Tata Mem Hosp, Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Dept Pathol, E Borges Rd, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Gallbladder carcinoma; Recurrence; FDG PET/CT; CANCER; RESECTION; PATTERNS; CARCINOMA; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s11604-022-01340-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To analyze diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT in recurrent adenocarcinoma gallbladder (GBC) and to establish its possible impact on post-recurrence survival. Method FDG PET/CT studies of suspected recurrent GBC were retrospectively analyzed alongside tumor markers serum CEA and CA 19-9. Abnormal FDG-avid lesions and abnormal morphological lesions were considered positive for recurrence, and were categorized as isolated abdominal wall recurrence, loco-regional recurrence, and distant metastatic disease. Histopathology, definite progression on imaging and positive response to treatment was considered as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were used as diagnostic performance parameters. Post-recurrence survival was calculated whenever appropriate follow-up was available, based on the abovementioned categories of sites of recurrence using survival curves and log-rank test. Results Out of 117 PET/CT studies, 93 (79.5%) were positive and 24 (20.5%) were negative for recurrence. 86 out of 93 were true positive and 23 of 24 were true negative. PET/CT demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 98.8%, 76.7%, 92.5%, 95.8% and 93.1%, respectively. Diagnostic performance of PET/CT was significantly better than combination tumor markers. Of 66 cases with available follow-up, isolated abdominal wall (port/scar site) recurrence and loco-regional recurrence demonstrated significantly higher post-recurrence survival as compared to distant metastasis; median survival being 39, 25 and 12 months, respectively. Conclusion F-18 FDG PET/CT has better diagnostic performance than tumor markers combination. Isolated abdominal wall (port/scar site) recurrence and loco-regional recurrence on PET/CT demonstrated better survival than non-regional metastatic disease. These results suggest a possible role of PET/CT as a surveillance modality, as well as a guide to therapeutic decision-making in cases of recurrent GBC.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 208
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Biliary tract cancers: SEOM clinical guidelines
    Benavides, M.
    Anton, A.
    Gallego, J.
    Gomez, M. A.
    Jimenez-Gordo, A.
    La Casta, A.
    Laquente, B.
    Macarulla, T.
    Rodriguez-Mowbray, J. R.
    Maurel, J.
    [J]. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 17 (12) : 982 - 987
  • [2] Hepatobiliary Cancers
    Benson, Al B., III
    Abrams, Thomas A.
    Ben-Josef, Edgar
    Bloomston, P. Mark
    Botha, Jean F.
    Clary, Bryan M.
    Covey, Anne
    Curley, Steven A.
    D'Angelica, Michael I.
    Davila, Rene
    Ensminger, William D.
    Gibbs, John F.
    Laheru, Daniel
    Malafa, Mokenge P.
    Marrero, Jorge
    Meranze, Steven G.
    Mulvihill, Sean J.
    Park, James O.
    Posey, James A.
    Sachdev, Jasgit
    Salem, Riad
    Sigurdson, Elin R.
    Sofocleous, Constantinos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2009, 7 (04): : 350 - 391
  • [3] The role of PET-CT in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer
    Butte, Jean M.
    Redondo, Francisca
    Waugh, Enrique
    Meneses, Manuel
    Pruzzo, Rossana
    Parada, Hugo
    Amaral, Horacio
    De La Fuente, Hernan A.
    [J]. HPB, 2009, 11 (07) : 585 - 591
  • [4] Chua TC., 2011, ADV LAPAROSCOPY, P137
  • [5] Role of PET CT Scan in Redefining Treatment of Incidental Gall Bladder Carcinoma
    Goel, Mahesh
    Tamhankar, Anup
    Rangarajan, Venkatesh
    Patkar, Shraddha
    Ramadwar, Mukta
    Shrikhande, Shailesh V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 113 (06) : 652 - 658
  • [6] Gallbladder carcinoma: prognostic factors and therapeutic options
    Goetze, Thorsten Oliver
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (43) : 12211 - 12217
  • [7] Gallbladder cancer: epidemiology and outcome
    Hundal, Rajveer
    Shaffer, Eldon A.
    [J]. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 6 : 99 - 109
  • [8] Patterns of initial disease recurrence after resection of gallbladder carcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma - Implications for adjuvant therapeutic strategies
    Jarnagin, WR
    Ruo, L
    Little, SA
    Klimstra, D
    D'Angelica, M
    DeMatteo, RP
    Wagman, R
    Blumgart, LH
    Fong, YM
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 98 (08) : 1689 - 1700
  • [9] Benefit of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Resected Gallbladder Carcinoma
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    Woo, Sang Myung
    Lee, Woo Jin
    Oh, Eun Sang
    Youn, Sang Hee
    Moon, Sung Ho
    Kim, Sang Soo
    Han, Sung Sik
    Park, Sang-Jae
    Kim, Dae Yong
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [10] Risk Factors Influencing Recurrence, Patterns of Recurrence, and the Efficacy of Adjuvant Therapy After Radical Resection for Gallbladder Carcinoma
    Kim, Woo Seok
    Choi, Dong Wook
    You, Dong Do
    Ho, Chuan Yu
    Heo, Jin Seok
    Choi, Seong Ho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2010, 14 (04) : 679 - 687