Interhemispheric Structural Connectivity Underlies Motor Recovery after Stroke

被引:10
作者
Paul, Theresa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wiemer, Valerie M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hensel, Lukas [1 ,2 ]
Cieslak, Matthew [4 ]
Tscherpel, Caroline [1 ,2 ]
Grefkes, Christian [5 ]
Grafton, Scott T. [6 ]
Fink, Gereon R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Volz, Lukas J. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Med Fac, Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Neurol, Cologne, Germany
[3] Res Ctr Juelich, Inst Neurosci & Med Cognit Neurosci INM 3, Julich, Germany
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Neurol, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[7] Univ Cologne, Dept Neurol, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
关键词
CORTICOSPINAL TRACT; CORPUS-CALLOSUM; REHABILITATION; INTEGRITY; CORTEX; IMPAIRMENT; MODULATION; PLASTICITY; PATHWAYS; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.1002/ana.26737
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Although ample evidence highlights that the ipsilesional corticospinal tract (CST) plays a crucial role in motor recovery after stroke, studies on cortico-cortical motor connections remain scarce and provide inconclusive results. Given their unique potential to serve as structural reserve enabling motor network reorganization, the question arises whether cortico-cortical connections may facilitate motor control depending on CST damage.Methods Diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI) and a novel compartment-wise analysis approach were used to quantify structural connectivity between bilateral cortical core motor regions in chronic stroke patients. Basal and complex motor control were differentially assessed.Results Both basal and complex motor performance were correlated with structural connectivity between bilateral premotor areas and ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) as well as interhemispheric M1 to M1 connectivity. Whereas complex motor skills depended on CST integrity, a strong association between M1 to M1 connectivity and basal motor control was observed independent of CST integrity especially in patients who underwent substantial motor recovery. Harnessing the informational wealth of cortico-cortical connectivity facilitated the explanation of both basal and complex motor control.Interpretation We demonstrate for the first time that distinct aspects of cortical structural reserve enable basal and complex motor control after stroke. In particular, recovery of basal motor control may be supported via an alternative route through contralesional M1 and non-crossing fibers of the contralesional CST. Our findings help to explain previous conflicting interpretations regarding the functional role of the contralesional M1 and highlight the potential of cortico-cortical structural connectivity as a future biomarker for motor recovery post-stroke. ANN NEUROL 2023
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 797
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Targeted Neuromodulation of Abnormal Interhemispheric Connectivity to Promote Neural Plasticity and Recovery of Arm Function after Stroke: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial Study Protocol
    Borich, Michael R.
    Wolf, Steven L.
    Tan, Andrew Q.
    Palmer, Jacqueline A.
    NEURAL PLASTICITY, 2018, 2018
  • [32] Longitudinal changes of motor cortex function during motor recovery after stroke
    Li Chunyong
    Li Yingkai
    Liu Fuda
    Che Jiang
    Yan Liu
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2023, 30 (04) : 342 - 354
  • [33] Does Resting Motor Threshold Predict Motor Hand Recovery After Stroke?
    Rosso, Charlotte
    Lamy, Jean-Charles
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [34] Proportional Motor Recovery After Stroke: Implications for Trial Design
    Stinear, Cathy M.
    Byblow, Winston D.
    Ackerley, Suzanne J.
    Smith, Marie-Claire
    Borges, Victor M.
    Barber, P. Alan
    STROKE, 2017, 48 (03) : 795 - 798
  • [35] Motor Cortex and Motor Cortical Interhemispheric Communication in Walking After Stroke: The Roles of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Animal Models in Our Current and Future Understanding
    Charalambous, Charalambos C.
    Bowden, Mark G.
    Adkins, DeAnna L.
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2016, 30 (01) : 94 - 102
  • [36] Comparing CST Lesion Metrics as Biomarkers for Recovery of Motor and Proprioceptive Impairments After Stroke
    Findlater, Sonja E.
    Hawe, Rachel L.
    Mazerolle, Erin L.
    Al Sultan, Abdulaziz S.
    Cassidy, Jessica M.
    Scott, Stephen H.
    Pike, G. Bruce
    Dukelow, Sean P.
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2019, 33 (10) : 848 - 861
  • [37] Self-Support Biofeedback Training for Recovery From Motor Impairment After Stroke
    Alnahar, Fady
    Ozaki, Ken-Ichi
    Itkonen, Matti
    Yamasaki, Hiroshi
    Tanimoto, Masanori
    Ueda, Ikue
    Kamiya, Masaki
    Tournier, Maxime
    Nagai, Chikara
    Garcia, Alvaro Costa
    Ohn, Kensuke
    Osawa, Aiko
    Kondo, Izumi
    Shimoda, Shingo
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 72138 - 72157
  • [38] Arm Motor Recovery After Ischemic Stroke: A Focus on Clinically Distinct Trajectory Groups
    Kline, Danielle K.
    Lin, David J.
    Cloutier, Alison
    Sloane, Kelly
    Parlman, Kristin
    Ranford, Jessica
    Picard-Fraser, Matthew
    Fox, Annie B.
    Hochberg, Leigh R.
    Kimberley, Teresa Jacobson
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2021, 45 (02): : 70 - 78
  • [39] A possible Sensory interpretation of Alternate Motor Fibers Relating to Structural Reserve during Stroke Recovery
    Kulikova, Sofya P.
    Nikulin, Vadim V.
    Dobrynina, Larisa A.
    Nazarova, Maria A.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [40] The importance of neuronal networks for motor rehabilitation after a stroke
    Hummel, F. C.
    NERVENARZT, 2017, 88 (08): : 850 - 857