An adjoint-based drag reduction technique for unsteady flows

被引:3
|
作者
Ruiz-Sanchez, Carlos J. [1 ]
Martinez-Cava, Alejandro [1 ,2 ]
Chavez-Modena, Miguel [1 ,3 ]
Valero, Eusebio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Plaza Cardenal Cisneros 3, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Inst Univ Ignacio Da Riva IDR UPM, Plaza Cardenal Cisneros 3, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Politecn Madrid, CCS UPM Ctr Computat Simulat, E-28660 Madrid, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; TURBULENT FLOWS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1063/5.0153892
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
A framework based on a continuous adjoint-based analysis of steady and unsteady flows to predict and control the drag force due to surface morphing is presented. By establishing a relation between perturbations in the body shape and in the boundary condition on a certain geometry, we derive an analytical expression of the sensitivity to changes in the geometry of the body and its relation to the sensitivity to the perturbation of the boundary conditions. The methodology is evaluated on the incompressible flow around a cylinder for steady and unsteady flows. A reduction of the drag coefficient was obtained and investigated by several surface deformations, conducted in the direction of the sensitivity vector field obtained by solving the derived adjoint problem. In unsteady flows, the sensitivity field is computed by integrating the unsteady adjoint problem backward in time from the unsteady flow solution. Two different types of deformations based on the calculated sensitivity were applied: time-averaged deformation and time-dependent. Attempting the latter, a deformation at each time step, did not yield the same satisfactory results as the time-averaged in terms of expected drag reduction. We provide a theoretical reasoning for the difference between both methodologies, together with an insight into the physics of the sensitivity vector field distribution relating it to the drag force sources.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis of flames
    Braman, Kalen
    Oliver, Todd A.
    Raman, Venkat
    COMBUSTION THEORY AND MODELLING, 2015, 19 (01) : 29 - 56
  • [32] Adjoint-based estimation and control of spatial, temporal and stochastic approximation errors in unsteady flow simulations
    Lakshminarayan, Vinod K.
    Duraisamy, Karthik
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2015, 121 : 180 - 191
  • [33] Adjoint-based exact Hessian computation
    Shin-ichi Ito
    Takeru Matsuda
    Yuto Miyatake
    BIT Numerical Mathematics, 2021, 61 : 503 - 522
  • [34] Adjoint-based determination of weaknesses in structures
    Airaudo, Facundo N.
    Lohner, Rainald
    Wuechner, Roland
    Antil, Harbir
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 417
  • [35] A discrete adjoint-based shape optimization for shear-layer-noise reduction
    University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana
    IL
    61801, United States
    Aeroacoustics Conf.,
  • [36] Efficient Airframe Noise Reduction Framework via Adjoint-Based Shape Optimization
    Zhou, Beckett Y.
    Albring, Tim
    Gauger, Nicolas R.
    da Silva, Carlos R.
    Economon, Thomas D.
    Alonso, Juan J.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2021, 59 (02) : 580 - 595
  • [37] DATA COMPRESSION ALGORITHMS FOR ADJOINT BASED SENSITIVITY STUDIES OF UNSTEADY FLOWS
    Yang, Liu
    Nadarajah, Siva
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME FLUIDS ENGINEERING DIVISION SUMMER MEETING, 2018, VOL 2, 2018,
  • [38] Adjoint-based adaptive observations in FASTEX
    Langland, RH
    Gelaro, R
    Rohaly, GD
    16TH CONFERENCE ON WEATHER ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING / SYMPOSIUM ON THE RESEARCH FOCI OF THE U.S. WEATHER RESEARCH PROGRAM, 1998, : 513 - 516
  • [39] Adjoint-based exact Hessian computation
    Ito, Shin-ichi
    Matsuda, Takeru
    Miyatake, Yuto
    BIT NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 2021, 61 (02) : 503 - 522
  • [40] Drag reduction of flows
    Malcher, Tadeusz
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2022, 101 (09): : 714 - 717