An adjoint-based drag reduction technique for unsteady flows

被引:3
|
作者
Ruiz-Sanchez, Carlos J. [1 ]
Martinez-Cava, Alejandro [1 ,2 ]
Chavez-Modena, Miguel [1 ,3 ]
Valero, Eusebio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Plaza Cardenal Cisneros 3, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Inst Univ Ignacio Da Riva IDR UPM, Plaza Cardenal Cisneros 3, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Politecn Madrid, CCS UPM Ctr Computat Simulat, E-28660 Madrid, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; TURBULENT FLOWS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1063/5.0153892
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
A framework based on a continuous adjoint-based analysis of steady and unsteady flows to predict and control the drag force due to surface morphing is presented. By establishing a relation between perturbations in the body shape and in the boundary condition on a certain geometry, we derive an analytical expression of the sensitivity to changes in the geometry of the body and its relation to the sensitivity to the perturbation of the boundary conditions. The methodology is evaluated on the incompressible flow around a cylinder for steady and unsteady flows. A reduction of the drag coefficient was obtained and investigated by several surface deformations, conducted in the direction of the sensitivity vector field obtained by solving the derived adjoint problem. In unsteady flows, the sensitivity field is computed by integrating the unsteady adjoint problem backward in time from the unsteady flow solution. Two different types of deformations based on the calculated sensitivity were applied: time-averaged deformation and time-dependent. Attempting the latter, a deformation at each time step, did not yield the same satisfactory results as the time-averaged in terms of expected drag reduction. We provide a theoretical reasoning for the difference between both methodologies, together with an insight into the physics of the sensitivity vector field distribution relating it to the drag force sources.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Control and Optimization of Interfacial Flows Using Adjoint-Based Techniques
    Fikl, Alexandru
    Le Chenadec, Vincent
    Sayadi, Taraneh
    FLUIDS, 2020, 5 (03)
  • [22] On the incremental singular value decomposition method to support unsteady adjoint-based optimization
    Vezyris, Christos
    Papoutsis-Kiachagias, Evangelos
    Giannakoglou, Kyriakos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2019, 91 (07) : 315 - 331
  • [23] Adjoint-based optimization of steady suction for disturbance control in incompressible flows
    Pralits, JO
    Hanifi, A
    Henningson, DS
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2002, 467 : 129 - 161
  • [24] EFFICIENT ADJOINT-BASED MESH ADAPTATION APPLIED TO TURBO-MACHINERY FLOWS
    Vivarelli, Guglielmo
    Qin, Ning
    Shahpar, Shahrokh
    Radford, David
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2018, VOL 2C, 2018,
  • [25] Unsteady wave drag reduction in hypersonic flows: Correlations and influences of and location
    John, Bibin
    Geca, Michal Jan
    Saravanan, Surya
    Rao, Dathi S. N. V. Rajasekhar
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 144
  • [26] Simulation and Adjoint-Based Design for Variable Density Incompressible Flows with Heat Transfer
    Economon, Thomas D.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2020, 58 (02) : 757 - 769
  • [27] Adjoint-Based Optimization of Three-Dimensional Flapping-Wing Flows
    Jones, Martin
    Yamaleev, Nail K.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2015, 53 (04) : 934 - 947
  • [28] Adjoint-based constrained topology optimization for viscous flows, including heat transfer
    Kontoleontos, E. A.
    Papoutsis-Kiachagias, E. M.
    Zymaris, A. S.
    Papadimitriou, D. I.
    Giannakoglou, K. C.
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2013, 45 (08) : 941 - 961
  • [29] Discrete Adjoint-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Framework for Natural Laminar Flows
    Kaya, Halil
    Tuncer, Ismail H.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2022, 60 (01) : 197 - 212
  • [30] Adjoint-based Analysis of Thermoacoustic Coupling
    Lemke, Mathias
    Reiss, Julius
    Sesterhenn, Joern
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS 2013, PTS 1 AND 2 (ICNAAM 2013), 2013, 1558 : 2163 - 2166