Community-government, and private partnership (CGPP): revisiting the concept of community-based forest management

被引:2
作者
Komalawati, K. [1 ]
Hidayat, S. [1 ,2 ]
Praptana, R. H. [3 ]
Pertiwi, M. D. [4 ]
Romdon, A. S. [5 ]
Hidayat, Y. [5 ]
Yuniati, D.
Syahyuti, S. [1 ]
Ramadhan, R. P. [1 ]
Saptana, S. [1 ]
Indrawanto, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Cooperat Corporat & Peoples Econ, Jl Jend Gator Subroto 10, Jakarta 12710, Indonesia
[2] Natl Univ, Jl Sawo Manila, Pasar Minggu 12520, Jakarta, Indonesia
[3] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Food Crops, Jl Raya Bogor Jakarta, Cibinong Bogor 16911, West Java, Indonesia
[4] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy Serpong, Res Ctr Sustainable Prod Syst & Life Cycle Assess, South Tanggerang City 15314, Banten, Indonesia
[5] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Behav & Circular Econ, Jl Jend Gator Subroto 10, Jakarta 12710, Indonesia
关键词
CBFM; forest; governance; partnerships; participation; sustainability; SOCIAL FORESTRY; INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS; INDONESIA; IMPLEMENTATION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1505/146554823837586276
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
yThe Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) model has been seen as a potential solution to solve various problems related to forest degradation and the creation of inclusive forest governance. However, in practice, CBFM does not always implement smoothly, with some studies highlighting the weaknesses of CBFM in term of accountability, transparency, efficiency, effectiveness, empowerment, monitoring, law enforcement, and dependency on external actors. Accordingly, this paper revisits the concept of CBFM from the perspective of New Institutional Economics and the proper governance concept. The data collection process was conducted through literature studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) methodology. It may be argued that the implementation of CBFM has weaknesses in terms of, amongst other things, business and organizational activities, inclusivity, community empowerment, community income, and sustainability. In reference to the various flaws encountered in the implementation of CBFM, and to put in place proper governance in forest business activities, this paper proposes a new model - the so-called Community-Government and Private Partnership model (CGPP). This developed model has positioned the cooperative as "core institutions" whose role is to orchestrate five main governance functions, namely: organizational, business activities, human resource development, and corporate and environmental sustainability. This CGPP model is expected to contribute to the existing literature of institutional analysis and forest management with a different approach, as well providing concrete recommendations for the implementation of the CGPP model in CBFM.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 326
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Institutional Capacity of Forest Management Unit in Promoting Sustainable Community-Based Forest Management. Case Study of Forest Management Unit in Central Sulawesi Province, Indonesia
    Massiri, Sudirman Daeng
    Malik, Adam
    Golar
    Hamzari
    Nugroho, Bramasto
    JURNAL MANAJEMEN HUTAN TROPIKA, 2020, 26 (02): : 169 - 177
  • [22] A respected central government and other obstacles to community-based management of the matsutake mushroom in Bhutan
    Brooks, Jeremy S.
    Tshering, Doley
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 37 (03) : 336 - 346
  • [23] Promoting environmental justice through community-based participatory research:: The role of community and partnership capacity
    Minkler, Meredith
    Vasquez, Victoria Breckwich
    Tajik, Mansoureh
    Petersen, Dana
    HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2008, 35 (01) : 119 - 137
  • [24] Effective Partnership in Community-Based Health Promotion: Lessons from the Health Literacy Partnership
    Estacio, Emee Vida
    Oliver, Mike
    Downing, Beth
    Kurth, Judy
    Protheroe, Joanne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 14 (12):
  • [25] Effects of national community-based forest certification on forest management and timber marketing: a case study of Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    Fujiwara, T.
    Awang, S. A.
    Widayanti, W. T.
    Septiana, R. M.
    Hyakumura, K.
    Sato, N.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2015, 17 (04) : 448 - 460
  • [26] The anatomy of social capital of a Canadian indigenous community: Implications of social trust field experiments for community-based forest management
    Kant, Shashi
    Vertinsky, Ilan
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2022, 144
  • [27] Barriers and opportunities regarding community-based forest management in Afghanistan: considerations for fragile states
    Khurram, Safiullah
    Shalizi, Mohammad Nasir
    Bashari, Mujtaba
    Akamani, Kofi
    Groninger, John W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2024, 51 (01) : 6 - 16
  • [28] Institutional choice and local legitimacy in community-based forest management: lessons from Cameroon
    Brown, H. Carolyn Peach
    Lassoie, James P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 37 (03) : 261 - 269
  • [29] Does community-based forest management in Indonesia devolve social justice or social costs?
    de Royer, S.
    van Noordwijk, M.
    Roshetko, J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2018, 20 (02) : 167 - 180
  • [30] Leadership accountability in community-based forest management: experimental evidence in support of governmental oversight
    Kahsay, Goytom Abraha
    Bulte, Erwin
    Alpizar, Francisco
    Hansen, Lars G.
    Medhin, Haileselassie
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2023, 28 (04):