Three-Field Versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: 3-Year Survival Outcomes of a Randomized Trial

BackgroundMinimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been used widely for the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for esophagectomy in MIE remains unclear. This trial aimed to investigate the 3-year survival and recurrence outcomes in a randomized controlled trial comparing MIE with either three-field lymphadenectomy (3-FL) or two-field lymphadenectomy (2-FL).MethodsBetween June 2016 and May 2019, 76 patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer were enrolled in a single-center randomized controlled trial and randomly assigned to MIE that included either 3-FL or 2-FL at a 1:1 ratio (n = 38 patients each). The survival outcomes and recurrence patterns were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe 3-year cumulative overall survival (OS) probability was 68.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 52.72-83.68 %) for the 3-FL group and 68.6 % (95 % CI, 53.12-84.08 %) for the 2-FL group. The 3-year cumulative probability of disease-free survival (DFS) was 66.3 % (95 % CI, 50.03-82.57 %) for the 3-FL group and 67.1 % (95 % CI, 51.03-83.17 %) for the 2-FL group.. The OS and DFS differences in the two groups were comparable. The overall recurrence rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.737). The incidence of cervical lymphatic recurrence in the 2-FL group was higher than in the 3-FL group (P = 0.051).ConclusionsCompared with 2-FL in MIE, 3-FL tended to prevent cervical lymphatic recurrence. However, it was not found to add survival benefit for the patients with thoracic esophageal cancer.