The temporal cost of deploying attention limits accurate target identification in rapid serial visual presentation

被引:0
作者
Kimata, Anna R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zheng, Bryan [2 ,3 ]
Watanabe, Takeo [1 ,5 ]
Asaad, Wael F. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Dept Neurosci, Carney Inst, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Rhode Isl Hosp, Alpert Med Sch, 593 Eddy St, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[4] Rhode Isl Hosp, Norman Prince Neurosci Inst, Providence, RI USA
[5] Brown Univ, Dept Cognit Linguist & Psychol Sci, Providence, RI USA
关键词
ALPHA-BAND OSCILLATIONS; TIME-COURSE; BLINK; SEARCH; MEMORY; INTEGRATION; DYNAMICS; STIMULI; ACCESS; TASK;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-30748-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Lag-1 sparing is a common exception to the attentional blink, where a target presented directly after T1 can be identified and reported accurately. Prior work has proposed potential mechanisms for lag 1 sparing, including the boost and bounce model and the attentional gating model. Here, we apply a rapid serial visual presentation task to investigate the temporal limitations of lag 1 sparing by testing three distinct hypotheses. We found that endogenous engagement of attention to T2 requires between 50 and 100 ms. Critically, faster presentation rates yielded lower T2 performance, whereas decreased image duration did not impair T2 detection and report. These observations were reinforced by subsequent experiments controlling for short-term learning and capacity-dependent visual processing effects. Thus, lag-1 sparing was limited by the intrinsic dynamics of attentional boost engagement rather than by earlier perceptual bottlenecks such as insufficient exposure to images in the stimulus stream or visual processing capacity limitations. Taken together, these findings support the boost and bounce theory over earlier models that focus only on attentional gating or visual short-term memory storage, informing our understanding of how the human visual system deploys attention under challenging temporal constraints.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Adaptive control of event integration:: Evidence from event-related potentials [J].
Akyurek, Elkan G. ;
Riddell, Patricia M. ;
Toffanin, Paolo ;
Hommel, Bernhard .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 (03) :383-391
[2]   Extended temporal integration in rapid serial visual presentation: Attentional control at Lag 1 and beyond [J].
Akyurek, Elkan G. ;
Wolff, Michael J. .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2016, 168 :50-64
[3]   High-performance execution of psychophysical tasks with complex visual stimuli in MATLAB [J].
Asaad, Wael F. ;
Santhanam, Navaneethan ;
McClellan, Steven ;
Freedman, David J. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 109 (01) :249-260
[4]   Oscillations in the prefrontal cortex: a gateway to memory and attention [J].
Benchenane, Karim ;
Tiesinga, Paul H. ;
Battaglia, Francesco P. .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) :475-485
[5]  
Bennett SC, 1996, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V37, P1373
[6]   FROM DETECTION TO IDENTIFICATION - RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE TARGETS IN RAPID SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION [J].
BROADBENT, DE ;
BROADBENT, MHP .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1987, 42 (02) :105-113
[7]   Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention [J].
Busch, Niko A. ;
VanRullen, Rufin .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (37) :16048-16053
[8]   The Phase of Ongoing EEG Oscillations Predicts Visual Perception [J].
Busch, Niko A. ;
Dubois, Julien ;
VanRullen, Rufin .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (24) :7869-7876
[9]   The speed of visual attention: What time is it? [J].
Carlson, Thomas A. ;
Hogendoorn, Hinze ;
Verstraten, Frans A. J. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2006, 6 (12) :1406-1411
[10]  
CHUN MM, 1995, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V21, P109