Why PV panels must be recycled at the end of their economic life span? A case study on recycling together with the global situation

被引:43
作者
Artas, Sultan Busra [1 ]
Kocaman, Emrullah [1 ]
Bilgic, Hasan Huseyin [2 ]
Tutumlu, Hakan [1 ]
Yagli, Huseyin [1 ,3 ]
Yumrutas, Recep [1 ]
机构
[1] Gaziantep Univ, Gaziantep, Turkiye
[2] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Konya, Turkiye
[3] Gaziantep Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Mech Engn, 27310, TR-31200 Sehitkamil, Gaziantep, Turkiye
关键词
Solar energy; photovoltaic panel; components of PV panel; recycling; environmental impact; OF-LIFE; PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS; WASTE ASSESSMENT; SILICON; MANAGEMENT; ENERGY; CRYSTALLINE; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2023.03.053
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of solar energy as a renewable energy source has been increasing in recent years. Photovoltaic (PV) panel technology is an important alternative to fossil fuels for the future energy needs of the world. PV panels, which have a lifespan of about 25-30 years, have a potential for photovoltaic waste in the coming years due to the increase in their production. There is a remarkable difference between the amount of CO2 emissions generated during the production of a PV panel and the amount of CO2 emissions generated during its recycling. When recycled, the environmental damage of PV panels is significantly reduced. Recycling also helps economically recover materials some of which are rare in nature. In this study, the structures of the components that compose PV panels are emphasized. The estimated waste projection of the PV for the world, Turkiye and, as a case study, Karapinar Solar Power Plant was analyzed until 2050. The harms of PV panels to the environment, people's health and their recycling potential were scrutinised. Furthermore, the carbon dioxide emissions and economic costs of the PV panels produced by recycling and the panels produced without recycling are compared.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 78
页数:16
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Abdelilah Yasmina, 2022, SPEC REP SOL PV GLOB, DOI [10.1787/9-8b0121-en, DOI 10.1787/9-8B0121-EN]
[2]   Environmental Impact of Solar and Wind energy- A Review [J].
Abu Hamed, Tareq ;
Alshare, Aiman .
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS-JSDEWES, 2022, 10 (02)
[3]   Why Kalina (Ammonia-Water) cycle rather than steam Rankine cycle and pure ammonia cycle: A comparative and comprehensive case study for a cogeneration system [J].
Aksar, Merve ;
Yagli, Huseyin ;
Koc, Yildiz ;
Koc, Ali ;
Sohani, Ali ;
Yumrutas, Recep .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 265
[4]   Technical and environmental analysis of photovoltaic and solar water heater cogeneration system: a case study of Saveh City [J].
Alayi, Reza ;
Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein ;
Visei, Amir Reza ;
Sharma, Shubham ;
Najafi, Atabak .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 16 (02) :447-453
[5]   Thermal and Environmental Analysis Solar Water Heater System for Residential Buildings [J].
Alayi, Reza ;
Khalilpoor, Nima ;
Heshmati, Saeid ;
Najafi, Atabak ;
Issakhov, Alibek .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHOTOENERGY, 2021, 2021
[6]   Multi-criteria decision-making approach for the selection of cleaning method of solar PV panels in United Arab Emirates based on sustainability perspective [J].
AlMallahi, Maryam Nooman ;
Assad, Mamdouh El Haj ;
AlShihabi, Sameh ;
Alayi, Reza .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 17 :380-393
[7]   A review of Safety, Health and Environmental (SHE) issues of solar energy system [J].
Aman, M. M. ;
Solangi, K. H. ;
Hossain, M. S. ;
Badarudin, A. ;
Jasmon, G. B. ;
Mokhlis, H. ;
Bakar, A. H. A. ;
Kazi, S. N. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 41 :1190-1204
[8]  
Angmo Dechan, 2014, SOL CELLS COMMER REA, P227, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4471-6473-9, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-6473-9]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2020, KARAPINAR YEKA 1 GES
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2021, SOLAR ENERGY SECTOR