The evidence-base for positive psychology interventions: a mega-analysis of meta-analyses

被引:21
作者
Carr, Alan [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Finneran, Laura [1 ]
Boyd, Christine [1 ]
Shirey, Claire [1 ]
Canning, Ciaran [1 ]
Stafford, Owen [1 ]
Lyons, James [1 ]
Cullen, Katie [1 ]
Prendergast, Cian [1 ]
Corbett, Chris [1 ]
Drumm, Chloe [1 ]
Burke, Tom [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Psychol, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Clanwilliam Inst, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Natl Univ Ireland Galway, Psychol, Galway, Ireland
[4] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Psychol, Clin Psychol, Newman Bldg, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
Positive psychology interventions; positive psychology interventions meta-analysis; positive psychology interventions systematic review; positive psychotherapy; quality of life; well-being; strengths; depression; anxiety; stress; IMPACT; HELP;
D O I
10.1080/17439760.2023.2168564
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study provides a quantitative synthesis of meta-analytic evidence for the effectiveness of very broadly defined positive psychological interventions (PPIs), i.e. interventions that enhance well-being through pathways consistent with positive psychology theory. The definition covers a wide range of PPIs including single and multi-element PPI programs as well as mindfulness, mind-body, and physical exercise-based interventions. Five databases were searched. One hundred and ninety eight meta-analyses involving 4,065 primary studies and 501,335 participants were selected for review. Using the AMSTAR-2 criteria, the selected meta-analyses were found to be of moderate or high quality. At post-intervention, PPIs had a significantly small to medium effect on well-being, QoL, strengths, depression, anxiety, and stress. Gains were partially maintained at 7.5-month follow-up. Mind-body PPIs such as yoga were particularly effective. Individuals who engaged in longer, face-to-face programs benefited most. This mega-analysis shows that PPIs have an extensive evidence base supporting their effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 205
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]  
Hendriks T., 2018, International Journal of Wellbeing, V8, P71, DOI [10.5502/ijw.v8i1.711, DOI 10.5502/IJW.V8I1.711]
[22]   The Efficacy of Multi-component Positive Psychology Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Hendriks, Tom ;
Schotanus-Dijkstra, Marijke ;
Hassankhan, Aabidien ;
De Jong, Joop ;
Bohlmeijer, Ernst .
JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2020, 21 (01) :357-390
[23]   Best Practice Guidelines and Essential Methodological Steps to Conduct Rigorous and Systematic Meta-Reviews [J].
Hennessy, Emily A. ;
Johnson, Blair T. ;
Keenan, Ciara .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-HEALTH AND WELL BEING, 2019, 11 (03) :353-381
[24]   Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (11) :1539-1558
[25]   Can psychological interventions increase optimism? A meta-analysis [J].
Malouff, John M. ;
Schutte, Nicola S. .
JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 12 (06) :594-604
[26]  
Niemiec R.M., 2013, Well-being and cultures: Perspectives on positive psychology, P11, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-4611-4_2, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4611-4_2, 10.1007/978-94-007-46114_2]
[27]  
Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n160, 10.1136/bmj.n71]
[28]  
Parks AC, 2014, WILEY BLACKWELL HANDBOOK OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781118315927
[29]   Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry [J].
Peters, Jaime L. ;
Sutton, Alex J. ;
Jones, David R. ;
Abrams, Keith R. ;
Rushton, Lesley .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (10) :991-996
[30]  
Peterson C., 2004, Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification