Big Earth Data for quantitative measurement of community resilience: current challenges, progresses and future directions

被引:5
作者
Qiang, Yi [1 ,3 ]
Zou, Lei [2 ]
Cai, Heng [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Sch Geosci, Tampa, FL USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geog, College Stn, TX USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Sch Geosci, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Community resilience; quantitative measurement; disaster risk reduction; Big Earth Data; SOCIAL MEDIA DATA; GEOGRAPHICAL DISPARITIES; NATURAL HAZARDS; DISASTER; RECOVERY; VULNERABILITY; VALIDATION; INDICATORS; LANDSCAPE; ANALYTICS;
D O I
10.1080/20964471.2023.2273594
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Quantitative assessment of community resilience can provide support for hazard mitigation, disaster risk reduction, disaster relief, and long-term sustainable development. Traditional resilience assessment tools are mostly theory-driven and lack empirical validation, which impedes scientific understanding of community resilience and practical decision-making of resilience improvement. In the advent of the Big Data Era, the increasing data availability and advances in computing and modeling techniques offer new opportunities to understand, measure, and promote community resilience. This article provides a comprehensive review of the definitions of community resilience, along with the traditional and emerging data and methods of quantitative resilience measurement. The theoretical bases, modeling principles, advantages, and disadvantages of the methods are discussed. Finally, we point out research avenues to overcome the existing challenges and develop robust methods to measure and promote community resilience. This article establishes guidance for scientists to further advance disaster research and for planners and policymakers to design actionable tools to develop sustainable and resilient communities.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1057
页数:23
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Adeola FO, 2009, HUM ECOL REV, V16, P195
[2]   Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters [J].
Adger, WN ;
Hughes, TP ;
Folke, C ;
Carpenter, SR ;
Rockström, J .
SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5737) :1036-1039
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Building Resilience in Americas Communities: Observations and Implications of the CRS Pilots
[4]   Analysing social media data for disaster preparedness: Understanding the opportunities and barriers faced by humanitarian actors [J].
Anson, Susan ;
Watson, Hayley ;
Wadhwa, Kush ;
Metz, Karin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2017, 21 :131-139
[5]   Validating Resilience and Vulnerability Indices in the Context of Natural Disasters [J].
Bakkensen, Laura A. ;
Fox-Lent, Cate ;
Read, Laura K. ;
Linkov, Igor .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (05) :982-1004
[6]   Remote sensing and flood inundation modelling [J].
Bates, PD .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2004, 18 (13) :2593-2597
[7]  
Beccari Benjamin, 2016, PLoS Curr, V8, DOI 10.1371/currents.dis.453df025e34b682e9737f95070f9b970
[8]  
Bevington J. S., 2012, Measuring, monitoring, and Evaluating post-disaster recovery: A key element in understanding community resilience, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1061/41171(401)177, DOI 10.1061/41171(401)177]
[9]  
Brown D. M., 2010, Monitoring and Evaluating post-disaster recovery using high-resolution satellite imagery-towards standardised indicators for post-disaster recovery
[10]   Crisis not over for hurricane victims [J].
Burton, Adrian .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2006, 114 (08) :A462-A462