Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial

被引:1
作者
Vervaat, F. E. [1 ,4 ]
van Der Gaag, A. [2 ]
Smetsers, C. [2 ]
Barneveld, P. C. [3 ]
Van't Veer, M. [1 ]
Teeuwen, K. [1 ]
van Suijlekom, H. [2 ]
Dekker, L. [1 ]
Wijnbergen, I. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Catharina Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[4] Catharina Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Michelangelolaan 2, NL-5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
refractory angina pectoris; spinal cord stimulation; trial design; SYMPTOMS; THERAPY; PERFUSION;
D O I
10.1002/clc.24016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is still under debate. Studies up to date have shown a positive effect with an improvement in quality of life. However, no double blinded randomized controlled trials have been performed. Hypothesis & MethodsThe objective of this trial is to investigate if high density SCS leads to a significant reduction in the amount of myocardial ischemia in patients with RAP. Eligible patients must meet the criteria for RAP, have proven ischemia and a positive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator treadmill test. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will receive an implanted spinal cord stimulator. Patients receive 6 months of high density SCS and 6 months of no stimulation using a cross-over design. The order of the treatment options is determined using randomization. The primary endpoint is the effect of SCS measured by the change in percentage of myocardial ischemia using myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography scan. Key secondary endpoints are patient related outcome measures, major cardiac adverse events and safety endpoints. The follow-up period is 1 year for the primary and key secondary endpoints. ResultsThe SCRAP trial began enrollment on December 21, 2021 and is set to complete the primary assessments in June 2025. To date, January 2, 2023, 18 patients have been enrolled in the study and 3 patients have completed the 1-year follow-up. ConclusionsThe SCRAP trial is an investigator-initiated, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and cross-over randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of SCS in patients with RAP. (ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT04915157)
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 697
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris-results from the European Angina Registry Link Study (EARL)
    Andrell, P.
    Yu, W.
    Gersbach, P.
    Gillberg, L.
    Pehrsson, K.
    Hardy, I.
    Stahle, A.
    Andersen, C.
    Mannheimer, C.
    [J]. HEART, 2010, 96 (14) : 1132 - 1136
  • [2] Collet JP, 2021, REV ESP CARDIOL, V74, DOI [10.1016/j.rec.2021.05.002, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575]
  • [3] Management of refractory angina: an update
    Davies, Allan
    Fox, Kim
    Galassi, Alfredo R.
    Banai, Shmuel
    Yla-Herttuala, Seppo
    Luescher, Thomas F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 (03) : 269 - 280C
  • [4] de Groot IB., 2019, STANDPUNT NEUROMODUL
  • [5] Symptomatic relief precedes improvement of myocardial blood flow in patients under spinal cord stimulation
    Diedrichs, H
    Zobel, C
    Theissen, P
    Weber, M
    Koulousakis, A
    Schicha, H
    Schwinger, RH
    [J]. CURRENT CONTROLLED TRIALS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2005, 6 (1):
  • [6] Thoracic spinal cord stimulation improves functional status and relieves symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris:: the first placebo-controlled randomised study
    Eddicks, Stephan
    Maier-Hauff, Klaus
    Schenk, Michael
    Mueller, Andreas
    Baumann, Gert
    Theres, Heinz
    [J]. HEART, 2007, 93 (05) : 585 - 590
  • [7] Complications of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Techniques: A Review of the Literature
    Eldabe, Sam
    Buchser, Eric
    Duarte, Rui V.
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (02) : 325 - 336
  • [8] The Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina (RASCAL Study): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Eldabe, Sam
    Thomson, Simon
    Duarte, Rui
    Brookes, Morag
    deBelder, Mark
    Raphael, Jon
    Davies, Ed
    Taylor, Rod
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2016, 19 (01): : 60 - 69
  • [9] Refractory Angina From Pathophysiology to New Therapeutic Nonpharmacological Technologies
    Gallone, Guglielmo
    Baldetti, Luca
    Tzanis, Georgios
    Gramegna, Mario
    Latib, Azeem
    Colombo, Antonio
    Henry, Timothy D.
    Giannini, Francesco
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [10] 2-PERIOD CHANGE-OVER DESIGN AND ITS USE IN CLINICAL TRIALS
    GRIZZLE, JE
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1965, 21 (02) : 467 - &