Minimal invasiveness in soft tissue augmentation at dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcome measures

被引:34
作者
Thoma, Daniel S. [1 ]
Strauss, Franz J. [1 ]
Mancini, Leonardo [1 ]
Gasser, Thomas J. W. [1 ]
Jung, Ronald E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Reconstruct Dent, Plattenstr 11, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
dental implants; minimal clinically important difference; Patient Reported Outcome Measure; PROMs; soft tissue augmentation; soft tissue substitutes; XENOGENEIC COLLAGEN MATRIX; SUBEPITHELIAL CONNECTIVE-TISSUE; KERATINIZED MUCOSA; CONSENSUS REPORT; HEALTH; COVERAGE; GRAFTS; PLACEMENT; INCREASE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1111/prd.12465
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of soft tissue substitutes versus autogenous grafts for soft tissue augmentation procedures at implant sites. Comprehensive and systematic literature searches were performed until December 2021. A focused question was formulated based on the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome criteria (PICO): In patients with dental implants undergoing soft tissue augmentation (P), do soft tissue substitutes (I) compared to autogenous soft tissue graft (SCTG [subepithelial connective tissue graft]) (C) limit the post-operative morbidity and other patient reported-outcomes measures (O). Randomized controlled clinical trials, prospective-, retrospective- and case-series studies were included. Meta-analyses were performed whenever possible and the results were expressed as weighted mean differences (WMD). A total of 29 clinical studies were included. For mucosal thickness gain, soft tissue substitutes significantly reduced the pain perception compared to SCTG (n = 4; WMD = 14.91 Visual Analog Scale [VAS] units; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.42-23.40; P < .0006) based on a 0-100 VAS scale. Based on a 0-10 VAS scale, a borderline significance of pain reduction was found when soft tissue substitutes were applied (n = 4; WMD = 1.62 VAS units; 95% CI 0.01-3.23; P = .05). For keratinized tissue gain, soft tissue substitutes significantly reduced the pain perception after keratinized tissue augmentation compared to SCTG based on a 0-100 VAS scale (n = 2; WMD = 21.43 VAS units; 95% CI 12.58-30.28; P < .0001). Based on the 0-10 VAS scale, soft tissue substitutes significantly reduced the pain as compared to SCTG (n = 4; WMD = 1.65 VAS units; 95% CI 0.66-2.64; P = .001). Regarding pain medication, soft tissue substitutes required less painkillers (n = 6; WMD = 1.56 tablets; 95% CI 1.22-1.91; P < .00001) after soft tissue augmentation. The surgery time was significantly reduced when soft tissue substitutes were used (n = 5; WMD = 10.9 minutes; 95% CI 4.60-17.19; P < .00001). There were no significant differences in satisfaction, aesthetics, and quality of life (OHIP-14) between soft tissue substitutes and autogenous grafts following soft tissue augmentation at implants sites. Soft tissue substitutes, compared to autogenous grafts, significantly improve PROMs following soft tissue augmentation at implant sites. Soft tissue substitutes can reduce pain perception, amounts of painkillers and surgery time while achieving similar levels of patient ' s satisfaction as autogenous grafts without impairing the clinical outcomes. The current evidence indicates that they constitute a valid and reliable alternative to minimize the invasiveness in soft tissue augmentation procedures at implant sites.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 198
页数:17
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Implant Associated Soft Tissue Defects in the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft and Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft [J].
Anderson, Lauren E. ;
Inglehart, Marita R. ;
El-Kholy, Karim ;
Eber, Robert ;
Wang, Hom-Lay .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (04) :416-425
[2]  
Baldi N., 2020, Clinical Trials in Dentistry, V2, P49, DOI [10.36130/CTD.03.2020.05, DOI 10.36130/CTD.03.2020.05]
[3]   Soft tissue augmentation around osseointegrated and uncovered dental implants: a systematic review [J].
Bassetti, Renzo G. ;
Stahli, Alexandra ;
Bassetti, Mario A. ;
Sculean, Anton .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 21 (01) :53-70
[4]   Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled clinical trial [J].
Cairo, Francesco ;
Barbato, Luigi ;
Tonelli, Paolo ;
Batalocco, Guido ;
Pagavino, Gabriella ;
Nieri, Michele .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 44 (07) :769-776
[5]   Soft tissue-related complications and management around dental implants [J].
Chackartchi, Tali ;
Romanos, Georgios E. ;
Sculean, Anton .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2019, 81 (01) :124-138
[6]   Patient Reported Outcomes and Their Importance in the Development of Novel Surgical Techniques [J].
Chow, Andre ;
Purkayastha, Sanjay ;
Dosanjh, Davinder ;
Sarvanandan, Romesh ;
Ahmed, Irfan ;
Paraskeva, Paraskevas .
SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2012, 19 (03) :327-334
[7]   Does placement of a connective tissue graft improve the outcomes of coronally advanced flap for coverage of single gingival recessions in upper anterior teeth? A multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial [J].
Cortellini, Pierpaolo ;
Tonetti, Maurizio ;
Baldi, Carlo ;
Francetti, Luca ;
Rasperini, Giulio ;
Rotundo, Roberto ;
Nieri, Michele ;
Franceschi, Debora ;
Labriola, Antonella ;
Prato, Giovanpaolo Pini .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2009, 36 (01) :68-79
[8]   A multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing connective tissue graft with collagen matrix to increase soft tissue thickness at the buccal aspect of single implants: 3-month results [J].
Cosyn, Jan ;
Eeckhout, Celien ;
Christiaens, Veronique ;
Eghbali, Aryan ;
Vervaeke, Stijn ;
Younes, Faris ;
De Bruyckere, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2021, 48 (12) :1502-1515
[9]   Clinical comparison of a xenogeneic collagen matrix versus subepithelial autogenous connective tissue graft for augmentation of soft tissue around implants [J].
De Angelis, P. ;
De Angelis, S. ;
Passarelli, P. C. ;
Liguori, M. G. ;
Pompa, G. ;
Papi, P. ;
Manicone, P. F. ;
D'Addona, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (07) :956-963
[10]   Influence of Immediate Implant Placement and Provisionalization with or without Soft Tissue Augmentation on Hard and Soft Tissues in the Esthetic Zone: A One-Year Retrospective Study [J].
De Angelis, Paolo ;
Manicone, Paolo Francesco ;
Gasparini, Giulio ;
De Angelis, Silvio ;
Liguori, Margherita Giorgia ;
De Filippis, Ilaria ;
D'Addona, Antonio .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021