Artificial intelligence-assisted real-time monitoring of effective withdrawal time during colonoscopy: a novel quality marker of colonoscopy

被引:6
作者
Lui, Thomas K. L. [1 ]
Ko, Michael K. L. [1 ]
Liu, Jing Jia [2 ]
Xiao, Xiao [2 ]
Leung, Wai K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Wision AI, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Med, 4-F Professorial Block,102 Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
BOWEL PREPARATION; ADENOMA DETECTION; SYSTEM; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2023.10.035
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: The importance of withdrawal time during colonoscopy cannot be overstated in mitigating the risk of missed lesions and postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. We evaluated a novel colonoscopy quality metric called the effective withdrawal time (EWT), which is an artificial intelligence (AI) -derived quantitative measure of quality withdrawal time, and its association with various colonic lesion detection rates as compared with standard withdrawal time (SWT). Methods: Three hundred fifty video recordings of colonoscopy withdrawal (from the cecum to the anus) were assessed by the new AI model. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR) according to different quintiles of EWT. Multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for baseline covariates, was used to determine the adjusted odd ratios (ORs) for EWT on lesion detection rates, with the lowest quintile as reference. The area under the receiver -operating characteristic curve of EWT was compared with SWT. Results: The crude ADR in different quintiles of EWT, from lowest to highest, was 10.0%, 31.4%, 33.3%, 53.5%, and 85.7%. The ORs of detecting adenomas and polyps were significantly higher in all top 4 quintiles when compared with the lowest quintile. Each minute increase in EWT was associated with a 49% increase in ADR (aOR, 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-1.65). The area under the receiver -operating characteristic curve of EWT was also significantly higher than SWT on adenoma detection (.80 [95% CI, .75-.84] vs .70 [95% CI, .64-.74], P < .01). Conclusions: AI -derived monitoring of EWT is a promising novel quality indicator for colonoscopy, which is more associated with ADR than SWT.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 427.e6
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Causes of Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers Based on World Endoscopy Organization System of Analysis [J].
Anderson, Rebecca ;
Burr, Nicholas E. ;
Valori, Roland .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (05) :1287-+
[2]   Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy [J].
Barclay, Robert L. ;
Vicari, Joseph J. ;
Doughty, Andrea S. ;
Johanson, John F. ;
Greenlaw, Roger L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (24) :2533-2541
[3]   Speedometer for withdrawal time monitoring during colonoscopy: a clinical implementation trial [J].
Barua, Ishita ;
Misawa, Masashi ;
Glissen Brown, Jeremy R. ;
Walradt, Trent ;
Kudo, Shin-ei ;
Sheth, Sunil G. ;
Nee, Judy ;
Iturrino, Johanna ;
Mukherjee, Rupa ;
Cheney, Catherine P. ;
Sawhney, Mandeep S. ;
Pleskow, Douglas K. ;
Mori, Kensaku ;
Loberg, Magnus ;
Kalager, Mette ;
Wieszczy, Paulina ;
Bretthauer, Michael ;
Berzin, Tyler M. ;
Mori, Yuichi .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 58 (06) :664-670
[4]   A comparison of 9-min colonoscopy withdrawal time and 6-min colonoscopy withdrawal time: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bhurwal, Abhishek ;
Rattan, Puru ;
Sarkar, Avik ;
Patel, Anish ;
Haroon, Shahid ;
Gjeorgjievski, Mihajlo ;
Bansal, Vikas ;
Mutneja, Hemant .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 (12) :3260-3267
[5]   Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death [J].
Bretthauer, M. ;
Loberg, M. ;
Wieszczy, P. ;
Kalager, M. ;
Emilsson, L. ;
Garborg, K. ;
Rupinski, M. ;
Dekker, E. ;
Spaander, M. ;
Bugajski, M. ;
Holme, O. ;
Zauber, A. G. ;
Pilonis, N. D. ;
Mroz, A. ;
Kuipers, E. J. ;
Shi, J. ;
Hernan, M. A. ;
Adami, H-O ;
Regula, J. ;
Hoff, G. ;
Kaminski, M. F. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 387 (17) :1547-1556
[6]   Epidemiology, characteristics, and survival of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Asia: A population-based study [J].
Cheung, Ka Shing ;
Chen, Lijia ;
Seto, Wai Kay ;
Leung, Wai K. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 34 (09) :1545-1553
[7]   Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy [J].
Chokshi, Reena V. ;
Hovis, Christine E. ;
Hollander, Thomas ;
Early, Dayna S. ;
Wang, Jean S. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (06) :1197-1203
[8]  
Dawwas MF, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P2539, DOI [10.1056/NEJMc1405329, 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086]
[9]   Impact of withdrawal time on adenoma detection rate: results from a prospective multicenter trial [J].
Desai, Madhav ;
Rex, Douglas K. ;
Bohm, Matthew E. ;
Davitkov, Perica ;
DeWitt, John M. ;
Fischer, Monika ;
Faulx, Gregory ;
Heath, Ryan ;
Imler, Timothy D. ;
James-Stevenson, Toyia N. ;
Kahi, Charles J. ;
Kessler, William R. ;
Kohli, Divyanshoo R. ;
McHenry, Lee ;
Rai, Tarun ;
Rogers, Nicholas A. ;
Sagi, Sashidhar V. ;
Sathyamurthy, Anjana ;
Vennalaganti, Prashanth ;
Sundaram, Suneha ;
Patel, Harsh ;
Higbee, April ;
Kennedy, Kevin ;
Lahr, Rachel ;
Stojadinovikj, Gjorgie ;
Campbell, Carlissa ;
Dasari, Chandra ;
Parasa, Sravanthi ;
Faulx, Ashley ;
Sharma, Prateek .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (03) :537-+
[10]   Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study [J].
Gong, Dexin ;
Wu, Lianlian ;
Zhang, Jun ;
Mu, Ganggang ;
Shen, Lei ;
Liu, Jun ;
Wang, Zhengqiang ;
Zhou, Wei ;
An, Ping ;
Huang, Xu ;
Jiang, Xiaoda ;
Li, Yanxia ;
Wan, Xinyue ;
Hu, Shan ;
Chen, Yiyun ;
Hu, Xiao ;
Xu, Youming ;
Zhu, Xiaoyun ;
Li, Suqin ;
Yao, Liwen ;
He, Xinqi ;
Chen, Di ;
Huang, Li ;
Wei, Xiao ;
Wang, Xuemei ;
Yu, Honggang .
LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 5 (04) :352-361