Application and Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Real-time Short-term Prediction of Air Pollutants

被引:2
作者
Kim, Yeong-Il [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Kwon-Ho [2 ,3 ]
Park, Seung-Han [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Gangneung Wonju Natl Univ, Spatial Informat Cooperat Program, Kangnung, South Korea
[2] Gangneung Wonju Natl Univ, Dept Atmospher & Environm Sci, Kangnung, South Korea
[3] Gangneung Wonju Natl Univ, Res Inst Radiat Satellite, Kangnung, South Korea
关键词
Air quality; Machine learning; PM; Air pollutants; R PACKAGE;
D O I
10.5572/KOSAE.2023.39.1.107
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In this study, the machine learning (ML) techniques were compared and evaluated for real-time short-term prediction of air pollutants and the accuracy of the prediction results using the optimal prediction technique was analyzed. Air quality data and meteorological data for the last four years (2015 similar to 2018) are used to train and test the ML system. The ML system consists of four models including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and Deep Neural Network (DNN), and the optimal model was determined through an error analysis technique using an accuracy verification index of Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination (R-2). The optimized model estimation results showed that the explicit error ranges were estimated (NO2=+/- 0.035 ppm, CO=+/- 0.071 ppm, SO2=+/- 0.0008 ppm, O-3=+/- 0.006 ppm, PM10=+/- 6.395 mu g/m(3), PM2.5=+/- 3.772 mu g/m(3)). Using the optimized model determined by the highest grade acquisition method, the modelling results during a year of 2019 showed relatively high accuracy as ( NO2= 14.146 +/- 5.864%, CO = 4.289 +/- 1.025%, SO2= 5.572 +/- 1.306%, O-3= 5.549 +/- 0.716%, PM10= 4.031 +/- 0.899%, PM2.5= 3.488 +/- 0.990%) respectively. These prediction results mean a significant level of error within the uncertainty of the model. Therefore, it was proved that the suggested methodology is effective in short-term prediction of air pollutants.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 127
页数:21
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [11] Günther F, 2010, R J, V2, P30
  • [12] Hearst MA., 1998, IEEE INTELL SYST, V13, P18, DOI [10.1109/5254.708428, DOI 10.1109/5254.708428]
  • [13] A neural network forecast for daily average PM10 concentrations in Belgium
    Hooyberghs, J
    Mensink, C
    Dumont, G
    Fierens, F
    Brasseur, O
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (18) : 3279 - 3289
  • [14] Neural network forecasting of air pollutants hourly concentrations using optimised temporal averages of meteorological variables and pollutant concentrations
    Hrust, Lovro
    Klaic, Zvjezdana Bencetic
    Krizan, Josip
    Antonic, Oleg
    Hercog, Predrag
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (35) : 5588 - 5596
  • [15] Applications of R package for statistical engineering
    Jang, Dae-Heung
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2020, 33 (01) : 87 - 105
  • [16] 김민우, 2022, [Journal of the Korean Data And Information Science Sociaty, 한국데이터정보과학회지], V33, P1095
  • [17] Kim Dong Hyun, 2019, [The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 한국ITS학회 논문지], V18, P44, DOI 10.12815/kits.2019.18.4.44
  • [18] Evaluation and Prediction of Column Aerosol by Using the Time Series Machine Learning Technique
    Kim, Yeong-Il
    Lee, Kwon-Ho
    Lee, Kyu-Tae
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 38 (01) : 57 - 73
  • [19] Korean Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (KIEST), 2007, DEV AIR QUAL FOR SYS
  • [20] LeCun Y., 1989, Advances in neural information processing systems, V2