Evaluating the perioperative analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided trigeminal nerve block in adult patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery under general anesthesia: A randomized controlled study

被引:0
作者
Misk, Maha [1 ]
Alshawadfy, Abdelrhman [1 ]
Lamei, Medhat [1 ]
Khames, Fatma [1 ]
Abd Elgawad, Mohamed [1 ]
Hendawy, Hamdy A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Suez Canal Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Ismailia, Egypt
关键词
Trigeminal nerve block; Ultrasonography; Analgesics; Maxillofacial surgery; PTERYGOPALATINE FOSSA; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; EFFICACY; INJECTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/11101849.2023.2238529
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Although ultrasound-guided nerve blocks have lately been used to control pain, there is not much evidence assessing the outcome of trigeminal nerve block (TNB) in maxillofacial surgery. This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of analgesia with an ultrasound-guided trigeminal nerve block (USGTNB) in patients undergoing unilateral maxillofacial surgery under general anesthesia. Methods This single-blinded, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial included 50 adult patients who had American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II and were prepared for elective unilateral maxillofacial procedure under general anesthesia. The patients were randomized into two groups. In the intervention (TNB) group, 25 patients received USGTNB using 5 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%, while in the control group, 25 patients received only general anesthesia. Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were the intraoperative hemodynamic parameters besides the postoperative pain, total opioid consumption, complications, and patient satisfaction. Results Compared to general anesthesia, USGTNB significantly reduced the intraoperative fentanyl consumption (2.38 & PLUSMN; 0.62 vs 0.36 & PLUSMN; 0.55, p < 0.001), and the intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure at 1, 2, and 3 h (p < 0.001), the numerical rating score during the 24 postoperative hours (p < 0.001), and the postoperative nalbuphine consumption (11.60 & PLUSMN; 4.72 vs 1.92 & PLUSMN; 3.28, p < 0.001). USGTNB had a better safety profile and showed better patient satisfaction compared to general anesthesia alone (8.04 & PLUSMN; 0.89 vs 5.84 & PLUSMN; 0.90, p < 0.001). Conclusion USGTNB can provide an effective, safe approach for controlling pain in adult patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 604
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Analgesic Efficacy of Bilateral Pterygopalatine Fossa Injection in Patients Undergoing Maxillofacial Cancer Surgeries Under General Anesthesia [J].
Abdelghafar, Ekramy M. ;
Abbas, Dina Nabil ;
Othman, Ahmed ;
Zayed, Sherif Bahaa Elddin ;
Shawki, Ashraf Hamed .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 37 (01) :159-166
[2]  
Basak Keskin Y., 2019, TOPICS LOCAL ANESTHE, P9
[3]  
Bouzinac A, 2014, MINERVA ANESTESIOL, V80, P860
[4]  
Rico AD, 2021, Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, V3, P100119, DOI [10.1016/j.adoms.2021.100119, 10.1016/j.adoms.2021.100119, DOI 10.1016/J.ADOMS.2021.100119]
[5]   A review of the true methodological quality of nutritional support trials conducted in the critically ill: Time for improvement [J].
Doig, GS ;
Simpson, F ;
Delaney, A .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 100 (02) :527-533
[6]  
Fillmore E.P., 2015, Nerves and Nerve Injuries, V1, P319, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12410390-0.00023-8, 10.1016/B978-0-12-410390-0.00023-8, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-410390-0.00023-8, 10.1016/B978-0-12410390-0.00023-8]
[7]   Postoperative Pain Control [J].
Garimella, Veerabhadram ;
Cellini, Christina .
CLINICS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2013, 26 (03) :191-196
[8]   Efficacy of bupivacaine injection after pulsed radiofrequency ablation in the management of trigeminal facial pain A prospective, randomized, and double-blind study [J].
Hilal, Faisal M. ;
Alyamani, Omar A. ;
Kaki, Abdullah M. .
SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (06) :551-558
[9]  
Jacob R, 2021, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the Clinician, P95
[10]   Visual analog scale (VAS) [J].
Johnson, EW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2001, 80 (10) :717-717