(De)legitimation of COVID-19 vaccination narratives on Facebook comments in Romania: Beyond the co-occurrence patterns of discursive strategies

被引:6
作者
Cmeciu, Camelia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Univ Bucharest, 1-3 Iuliu Maniu Blvd,6th Floor, Bucharest 050663, Romania
关键词
co-occurrence analysis; COVID-19; vaccination; (de)legitimation; discursive strategies; online comments; Romania; SOCIAL MEDIA; HPV VACCINATION; WEB; 2.0; ONLINE; COMMUNICATION; LEGITIMATION; INFORMATION; ADDRESS;
D O I
10.1177/09579265231174793
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The postmodern medical paradigm has empowered online users in the (de)legitimating process of health-related topics. By employing a co-occurrence analysis, this study identifies the thematic patterns used by Romanian online users in their multimodal comments to the #storiesfromvaccination Facebook campaign run by the Romanian government. The findings show that the commenters assessed source credibility through two thematic patterns: 'source exemplarity' and 'source distrust'. Health experts were more legitimized than laypersons and role models as sources in the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Two thematic patterns emerged in the assessment of vaccination, namely: 'immunization - past and present challenges' and 'vaccination supporter versus opponent cleavage'. In the discussion on immunization, a polarization between a nostalgic longing for the past and a present corrupted medical and political system prevailed, whereas the important feature of discursive antagonism could be observed in the latter thematic pattern. The co-occurrences of (de)legitimation strategies are explained with reference to the political and medical context, along with the challenges of social media usage in online vaccination communication campaigns.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 597
页数:26
相关论文
共 77 条
[31]  
Inglehart R, 2016, SSRN Electronic Journal, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.2818659, DOI 10.14281/18241.20, 10.2139/ssrn.2818659, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2818659]
[32]  
IRES (Romanian Institute for Evaluation and Strategy), 2021, VACC ROM AN PROF
[33]  
Isaila E., 2021, CE CONTINE VACCINUL
[34]   The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views [J].
Johnson, Neil F. ;
Velasquez, Nicolas ;
Restrepo, Nicholas Johnson ;
Leahy, Rhys ;
Gabriel, Nicholas ;
El Oud, Sara ;
Zheng Minzhang ;
Manrique, Pedro ;
Wuchty, Stefan ;
Lupu, Yonatan .
NATURE, 2020, 582 (7811) :230-+
[35]   Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm - An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement [J].
Kata, Anna .
VACCINE, 2012, 30 (25) :3778-3789
[36]   Medical populism and the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Lasco, Gideon .
GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 15 (10) :1417-1429
[37]   Medical populism [J].
Lasco, Gideon ;
Curato, Nicole .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2019, 221 :1-8
[38]   Discursive Legitimation of a Contested Actor Over Time: The Multinational Corporation as a Historical Case (1964-2012) [J].
Luyckx, Joost ;
Janssens, Maddy .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2016, 37 (11) :1595-1619
[39]   A multimodal critical discourse analysis of anti-vaccination information on Facebook [J].
Ma, Jinxuan ;
Stahl, Lynne .
LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2017, 39 (04) :303-310
[40]  
Maleva TM, 2021, Population and Economics, V5, P30, DOI [10.3897/popecon.5.e77832, 10.3897/ popecon.5.e77832, DOI 10.3897/POPECON.5.E77832, 10.3897/popecon.5.e77832]