Fear of reinjury following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

被引:21
|
作者
Mir, Basit [1 ]
Vivekanantha, Prushoth [2 ]
Dhillon, Saihajleen [3 ]
Cotnareanu, Odette [4 ]
Cohen, Dan [5 ]
Nagai, Kanto [6 ]
de Sa, Darren [5 ]
机构
[1] Ashford & St Peters Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Chertsey, Surrey, England
[2] McMaster, Michael DeGroote Sch Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Queens Univ, Fac Arts & Sci, Kingston, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, 1200 Main St West,4E14, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[6] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; ACL reconstruction; Fear of reinjury; Kinesiophobia; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; TAMPA SCALE; KNEE; KINESIOPHOBIA; AVOIDANCE; RETURN; OSTEOARTHRITIS; ASSOCIATION; IMPAIRMENT; CONFIDENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-022-07296-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose This review aims to elucidate the most commonly reported method to quantify fear of reinjury or kinesiophobia and to identify key variables that influence the degree of kinesiophobia following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods A systematic search across three databases (Pubmed, Ovid (MEDLINE), and EMBASE) was conducted from database inception to August 7th, 2022. The authors adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted according to the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Results Twenty-six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and resulted in 2,213 total patients with a mean age of 27.6 years and a mean follow-up time of 36.7 months post-surgery. The mean MINORS score of the included studies was 11 out of 16 for non-comparative studies and 18 out of 24 for comparative studies. Eighty-eight percent of included studies used variations of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) to quantify kinesiophobia and 27.0% used Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI). The results of this study shows a common association between higher kinesiophobia and poor patient-reported functional status measured using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Scores, Activity of Daily Living (ADL), Quality of Life (QOL), and Sports/Recreation (S/R) subscales of Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) and Lysholm scores. Postoperative symptoms and pain catastrophizing measured using the KOOS pain and symptom subscales and Pain Catastrophizing Score (PCS) also influenced the degree of kinesiophobia following ACLR. Patients with an increased injury to surgery time and being closer to the date of surgery postoperatively demonstrated higher levels of kinesiophobia. Less common variables included being a female patient, low preoperative and postoperative activity status and low self-efficacy. Conclusion The most common methods used to report kinesiophobia following primary ACLR were variations of the TSK scale followed by ACL-RSI. The most commonly reported factors influencing higher kinesiophobia in this patient population include lower patient-reported functional status, more severe postoperative symptoms such as pain, increased injury to surgery time, and being closer to the date of surgery postoperatively. Kinesiophobia following primary ACLR is a critical element affecting post-surgical outcomes, and screening should be implemented postoperatively to potentially treat in rehabilitation and recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:2299 / 2314
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A Systematic Review of Nontuberculous Mycobacterium Infection Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Heifner, John J.
    Hunter, Mitchell L.
    Corces, Arturo
    Hommen, Jan Pieter
    JBJS OPEN ACCESS, 2023, 8 (02)
  • [12] Is postural control restored following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review
    Brooke E. Howells
    Clare L. Ardern
    Kate E. Webster
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2011, 19 : 1168 - 1177
  • [13] Test Batteries After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Roe, Chelsey
    Jacobs, Cale
    Hoch, Johanna
    Johnson, Darren L.
    Noehren, Brian
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2022, 14 (02): : 205 - 215
  • [14] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the ligament augmentation and reconstruction system: a systematic review
    Simon D. S. Newman
    Henry D. E. Atkinson
    Charles A. Willis-Owen
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 321 - 326
  • [15] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the ligament augmentation and reconstruction system: a systematic review
    Newman, Simon D. S.
    Atkinson, Henry D. E.
    Willis-Owen, Charles A.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (02) : 321 - 326
  • [16] Risk factors of knee reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Adhitya, I. Putu Gde Surya
    Yu, Wen-Yu
    Kurniawati, Ida
    Lin, Mau-Roung
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 48 (04) : 983 - 990
  • [17] Risk of Reinjury or Subsequent Injury After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Erickson, Brandon J.
    Pham, Andrew
    Haro, Marc S.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 24 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [18] An Exploration of Sports Rehabilitators' and Athletic Rehabilitation Therapists' Views on Fear of Reinjury After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    McVeigh, Fiona
    Pack, Stephen M.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2015, 24 (02) : 140 - 150
  • [19] Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review
    Taylor, Samuel A.
    Khair, M. Michael
    Roberts, Timothy R.
    DiFelice, Gregory S.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (11): : 2233 - 2247
  • [20] Return to Sport Following Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Athletes: A Systematic Review
    Glogovac, Georgina
    Schumaier, Adam P.
    Grawe, Brian M.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2019, 35 (07): : 2222 - 2230